Skip to main content
Log in

Validity of the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale for predicting 30-day mortality due to severe trauma: a retrospective single-center study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Since January 2016, emergency medical centers in South Korea have used the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS) as the initial triage tool for all patients, including trauma patients, who visited the emergency department (ED). This present study aimed to assess the validity of the KTAS for predicting 30-day mortality due to severe trauma.

Methods

This retrospective study included patients with severe trauma (injury severity score ≥ 16) from January 2016 to December 2017. Using KTAS, all patients were triaged as levels 1, 2, 3, and 4 by triage nurses. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality, and the secondary outcome was disposition at the ED. Disposition at the ED included admission to the general ward, intensive care unit, or operation room or death in the ED.

Results

Of the 827 included patients, 30-day mortality was observed in 14.9% (n = 123) of patients. Mortality was observed in 52.5% (n = 42), 15.5% (n = 69), 4.1% (n = 12), and 0.0% (n = 0) of patients in levels 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The Cox proportional hazard regression analysis showed that compared to level 3, level 1 [hazard ratio (HR) 4.868; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.341–10.119] and level 2 (HR 2.070; 95% CI 1.083–3.956) were independently associated with 30-day mortality. Patients with lower KTAS levels were more likely to be admitted to the operation room and were more likely to die in the ED.

Conclusion

Lower KTAS levels were associated with higher 30-day mortality due to severe trauma. KTAS shows adequate validity for predicting 30-day mortality from severe trauma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McCarthy ML, Zeger SL, Ding R, et al. Crowding delays treatment and lengthens emergency department length of stay, even among high-acuity patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54:492–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pines JM, Hollander JE. Emergency department crowding is associated with poor care for patients with severe pain. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;51:1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. McCaig LF, Newar EW. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2004 emergency department summary. Adv Data. 2006;(372):1–29.

  4. Hardern RD. Critical appraisal of papers describing triage systems. Acad Emerg Med. 1999;6:1166–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee B, Kim DK, Park JD, Kwak YH. Clinical considerations when applying vital signs in pediatric Korean Triage and Acuity Scale. J Korean Med Sci. 2017;32:1702–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lefering R, Paffrath T, Bouamra O, et al. Epidemiology of in-hospital trauma death. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2012;38:3–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Porter A, Karim S, Bowman SM, Recicar J, Bledsoe GH, Maxson RT. Impact of a statewide trauma system on the triage, transfer, and inpatient mortality of injured patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;84:771–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Miller RT, Nazir N, McDonald T, Cannon CM. The modified rapid emergency medicine score: a novel trauma triage tool to predict in-hospital mortality. Injury. 2017;48:1870–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cannon CM, Braxton CC, Kling-Smith M, Mahnken JD, Carlton E, Moncure M. Utility of the shock index in predicting mortality in traumatically injured patients. J Trauma. 2009;67:1426–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yates MT, Ishikawa T, Schneeberg A, Brussoni M. Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (PaedsCTAS) as a measure of injury severity. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13:E659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Baker SP, O’Neill B, Haddon W Jr, Long WB. The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluation emergency care. J Trauma. 1974;14:187–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Skaga NO, Eken T, Jones JM, Steen PA. Different definitions of patient outcome: consequences for performance analysis in trauma. Injury. 2008;39:612–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuo SCH, Kuo PJ, Chen YC, Chien PC, Hsieh HY, Hsieh CH. Comparison of the new exponential injury severity score with the injury severity score and the new injury severity score in trauma patients: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0187871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Birkhahn RH, Gaeta TJ, Terry D, Bove JJ, Tloczkowski J. Shock index in diagnosing early acute hypovolemia. Am J Emerg Med. 2005;23:323–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mutschler M, Nienaber U, Münzberg M, et al. The Shock Index revisited—a fast guide to transfusion requirement? A retrospective analysis on 21,853 patients derived from the Trauma Register DGU. Crit Care Lond Engl. 2013;17:R172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. El-Menyar A, Goyal P, Tilley E, Latifi R. The clinical utility of shock index to predict the need for blood transfusion and outcomes in trauma. J Surg Res. 2018;227:52–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kuriyama A, Ikegami T, Kaihara T, Fukuoka T, Nakayama T. Validity of the Japan Acuity and Triage Scale in adults: a cohort study. Emerg Med J. 2018;35:384–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee JY, Oh SH, Peck EH, et al. The validity of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in predicting resource utilization and the need for immediate life-saving interventions in elderly emergency department patients. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011;19:68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Miller J, Lieberman L, Nahab B, et al. Delayed intracranial hemorrhage in the anticoagulated patient: a systematic review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;79:310–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Goettler CE, Stallion A, Grisoni ER, Dudgeon DL. Delayed hemorrhage after blunt hepatic trauma: case report. J Trauma. 2002;52:556–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Evrimler S, Okumuser I, Delibas D. Delayed small bowel perforation with findings of severe ischemia following blunt abdominal trauma. Pol J Radiol. 2017;82:271–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chang SW, Ryu KM, Ryu JW. Delayed massive hemothorax requiring surgery after blunt thoracic trauma over a 5-year period: complicating rib fracture with sharp edge associated with diaphragm injury. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2018;5:60–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jiménez JG, Murray MJ, Beveridge R, et al. Implementation of the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in the principality of andorra: can triage parameters serve as emergency department quality indicators? CJEM. 2003;5:315–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rainer TH, Ho AM, Yeung JH, et al. Early risk stratification of patients with major trauma requiring massive blood transfusion. Resuscitation. 2011;82:724–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sawamura A, Hayakawa M, Gando S, et al. Disseminated intravascular coagulation with a fibrinolytic phenotype at an early phase of trauma predicts mortality. Thromb Res. 2009;124:608–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Mr. Seong Woo Yun for his generous support. He helped us to gather data when we drafted the first manuscript and advised us to revise the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by a Grant (CRI 18007-1) from Chonnam National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong Hun Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors (Yong Deok Lim, Dong Hun Lee, Byung Kook Lee, Yong Soo Cho, Goeun Choi, and Seong Woo Yun) report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article. No funds were received by any of the authors in support of this study.

Ethical approval

The present study protocol was reviewed and approved by the institutional review board of Chonnam National University College of Medicine (Reg. no. CNUH-2018-066).

Informed consent

Informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study by the institutional review board.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 18 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lim, Y.D., Lee, D.H., Lee, B.K. et al. Validity of the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale for predicting 30-day mortality due to severe trauma: a retrospective single-center study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 46, 895–901 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-018-1048-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-018-1048-y

Keywords

Navigation