Skip to main content
Log in

Accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis with coexistent acute pancreatitis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Acute cholecystitis and pancreatitis are acute forms of cholecystolithiasis. The presence of acute cholecystitis can lead to important changes in therapy in the early course of acute pancreatitis. The aim of this study was to identify the accuracy of ultrasonography in diagnosing acute cholecystitis with coexistent acute pancreatitis.

Methods

Subjects were all those patients admitted to our hospital with a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis between 1998 and 2015 who underwent cholecystectomy within 15 days of the ultrasonography performed on admittance. Patient data were analyzed retrospectively to compare the ultrasound findings with the pathological findings of the resected gallbladders. Patients were allocated to two groups according to the signs of acute cholecystitis on ultrasonography: group 1 negative and group 2 positive.

Results

One hundred and twenty patients were enrolled in the study: 77 in group 1 and 43 in group 2. Similar results were found for the two groups with respect to the pathological diagnosis of acute cholecystitis, i.e., 31.2 % for group 1 and 27.9 % for group 2. Analysis indicated that there was no correlation between the ultrasonography data and pathological findings (p = 0.708).

Conclusions

On the basis of our study, ultrasound findings alone cannot be used to accurately diagnose acute cholecystitis in the setting of acute pancreatitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cucher D, Kulvatunyou N, Green D, Jie T, Ong E. Gallstone pancreatitis. Surg Clin N Am. 2014;94(2):257–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Knab L, Boller A, Mahvi D. Cholecystitis. Surg Clin N Am. 2014;94(2):455–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hartwig W, Büchler M. Acute cholecystitis. Adv Surg. 2014;48(1):155–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gress T, El-Omar E. Revision of the Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis: the editorial perspective. Gut. 2012;62(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stone H, Fabian T, Dunlop W. Gallstone pancreatitis: biliary tract pathology in relation to time of operatio. Ann Surg. 1981;194(3):305–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sanchez-Ubeda R, Rousselot L, Giannelli S. The significance of pancreatitis accompanying acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg. 1956;144(1):44–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Perera M, Pham T, Toshniwal S, Lennie Y, Chan S, Houli N. A case of concomitant perforated acute cholecystitis and pancreatitis. Case Rep Surg. 2013;2013:1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hsin-Hui C, Wu-Feng H, Cheng-Chiang H, Tai-Chien H. Synchronous emphysematous cholecystitis and acute pancreatitis: a case report. J Int Med Taiwan. 2008;19:428–31.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dietz D, Sell H. Concomitant biliary pancreatitis and acute cholecystitis. Presentation presented at; 2005; 46th Annual Meeting of the Society for the Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Chicago, IL.

  10. Chen E, Huang J, Xu Z, Fei J, Mao E, Zhang S. Clinical features and outcomes of patients with severe acute pancreatitis complicated with gangrenous cholecystitis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2013;12(3):317–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tong Z, Yu W, Ke L, Wu C, Li W, Ni H, et al. Acute cholecystitis in the late phase of severe acute pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2013;42(3):531–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hung A, Honakeri S, Giles A, Steger A. Prevalence of cholecystitis in gallbladder histology following clinical pancreatitis: cohort study. JRSM Short Rep. 2013;4(9):2042533313490294.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Chitkara Y. Pathology of the gallbladder in gallstone pancreatitis. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1995;119(4):355–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin J, Hou S, Huang L, Sun J, Chang W, Lu J. Acute cholecystitis accompanied by acute pancreatitis potentially caused by Dolosigranulum pigrum. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(6):2298–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hirota M, Takada T, Kawarada Y, Nimura Y, Miura F, Hirata K, et al. Diagnostic criteria and severity assessment of acute cholecystitis: Tokyo guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2007;14(1):78–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Yokoe M, Takada T, Strasberg S, Solomkin J, Mayumi T, Gomi H, et al. New diagnostic criteria and severity assessment of acute cholecystitis in revised Tokyo guidelines. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Sci. 2012;19(5):578–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yokoe M, Takada T, Strasberg S, Solomkin J, Mayumi T, Gomi H, et al. TG13 diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Sci. 2013;20(1):35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hunt D, Chu F. Gangrenous cholecystitis in the laparoscopic era. ANZ J Surg. 2000;70(6):428–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Raghavendra B, Feiner H, Subramanyam B, Ranson J, Toder S, Horii S, et al. Acute cholecystitis: sonographic-pathologic analysis. Am J Roentgenol. 1981;137(2):327–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Butterfield T, Best T, Merrick M. The dual roles of neutrophils and macrophages in inflammation: a critical balance between tissue damage and repair. J Athl Train. 2006;41(4):457–65.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Broughton G, Janis J, Attinger C. The basic science of wound healing. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(Supplement):12S–34S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Aller M, Arias J, Sanchez-Patan F, Arias J. The inflammatory response. An efficient way of life. Med Sci Monit. 2006;12(10):225–34.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gil-Bona J, Sabaté A, Bovadilla J, Adroer R, Koo M, Jaurrieta E. Charlson index and the surgical risk scale in the analysis of surgical mortality. Cirugía Española (Engl Ed). 2010;88(3):174–9.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Charlson M, Pompei P, Ales K, MacKenzie C. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. O’Keefe D. Brief Report: Post hoc power, observed power, a priori power, retrospective power, prospective power, achieved power: sorting out appropriate uses of statistical power analyses. Commun Methods Meas. 2007;1(4):291–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cura Rodríguez J, Seguí P, Nicolau C. Learning ultrasound imaging. Berlin: Springer; 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Shah K, Wolfe R. Hepatobiliary ultrasound. Emerg Med Clin N Am. 2004;22(3):661–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tchelepi H, Ralls P. Ultrasound of acute pancreatitis. Ultrasound Clin. 2007;2(3):415–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Pereira.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no identifiable conflict of interest to report. J. Pereira, A. C. Afonso, J. Constantino, A. Matos, C. Henriques, M. Zago and L. Pinheiro have no financial or proprietary interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors. All patient data were collected retrospectively. Anonymity of participants was guaranteed, and the ethical review board was notified of this study. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pereira, J., Afonso, A.C., Constantino, J. et al. Accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis with coexistent acute pancreatitis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 43, 79–83 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-015-0619-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-015-0619-4

Keywords

Navigation