Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ganga hospital open injury score in management of open injuries

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Open injuries of the limbs offer challenges in management as there are still many grey zones in decision making regarding salvage, timing and type of reconstruction. As a result, there is still an unacceptable rate of secondary amputations which lead to tremendous waste of resources and psychological devastation of the patient and his family. Gustilo Anderson’s classification was a major milestone in grading the severity of injury but however suffers from the disadvantages of imprecise definition, a poor interobserver correlation, inability to address the issue of salvage and inclusion of a wide spectrum of injuries in Type IIIb category. Numerous scores such as Mangled Extremity Severity Score, the Predictive Salvage Index, the Limb Salvage Index, Hannover Fracture Scale-97 etc have been proposed but all have the disadvantage of retrospective evaluation, inadequate sample sizes and poor sensitivity and specificity to amputation, especially in IIIb injuries.

Methods

The Ganga Hospital Open Injury Score (GHOIS) was proposed in 2004 and is designed to specifically address the outcome in IIIb injuries of the tibia without vascular deficit. It evaluates the severity of injury to the three components of the limb—the skin, the bone and the musculotendinous structures separately on a grade from 0 to 5. Seven comorbid factors which influence the treatment and the outcome are included in the score with two marks each. The application of the total score and the individual tissue scores in management of IIIB injuries is discussed.

Results

The total score was shown to predict salvage when the value was 14 or less; amputation when the score was 17 and more. A grey zone of 15 and 16 is provided where the decision making had to be made on a case to case basis. The additional value of GHOIS was its ability to guide the timing and type of reconstruction. A skin score of more than 3 always required a flap and hence it indicated the need for an orthoplastic approach from the index procedure. Bone score of 4 and 5 will require complex reconstruction procedures like bone transport, extensive bone grafting or free fibular graft. Regarding the timing of reconstruction, injuries with a score of 9 or less indicated a low violence trauma and were amenable for early soft tissue reconstruction whereas injuries with a score of 10 or more indicated high violence injuries where a staged reconstruction policy must be followed.

Conclusions

Ganga Hospital Open Injury Score was found to be highly useful in decision making regarding salvage in IIIB injuries. The individual tissue scores were also useful to provide guidance regarding the timing and type of bone and soft tissue reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gustilo RB, Mendoza RM, Williams DN. Problems in the management of type III (severe) open fractures: a new classification of type III open fractures. J Trauma. 1984;24(8):742–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gustilo RB, Gruninger RP, Davis T. Classification of type III (severe) open fractures relative to treatment and results. Orthopedics. 1987;10(12):1781–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gustilo RB. Management of open fractures. An analysis of 673 cases. Minn Med. 1971;54(3):185–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bosse MJ, et al. A prospective evaluation of the clinical utility of the lower-extremity injury-severity scores. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:3–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rajasekaran S, Giannoudis PV. Open injuries of the lower extremity: issues and unknown frontiers. Injury. 2012;43(11):1783–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rajasekaran S, et al. Immediate primary skin closure in type-III A and B open fractures: results after a minimum of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:217–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rajasekaran S, et al. A score for predicting salvage and outcome in Gustilo type-IIIA and type-IIIB open tibial fractures. Journal Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(10):1351–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brohi K, Cohen MJ, Davenport RA. Acute coagulopathy of trauma: mechanism, identification and effect. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007;13:680–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gustilo RB. Interobserver agreement in the classification of open fractures of the tibia. The results of a survey of two hundred and forty-five orthopaedic surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77(8):1291–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Horn BD, Rettig ME. Interobserver reliability in the Gustilo and Anderson classification of open fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1993;7(4):357–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Templeman DC, et al. Update on the management of open fractures of the tibial shaft. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;350:18–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Johansen K, et al. Objective criteria accurately predict amputation following lower extremity trauma. J Trauma. 1990;30(5):568–72 discussion 572-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Howe HR Jr, et al. Salvage of lower extremities following combined orthopedic and vascular trauma. A predictive salvage index. Am Surg. 1987;53(4):205–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Russell WL, et al. Limb salvage versus traumatic amputation. A decision based on a seven-part predictive index. Ann Surg. 1991;213(5):473–80 discussion 480-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McNamara MG, Heckman JD, Corley FG. Severe open fractures of the lower extremity: a retrospective evaluation of the Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS). J Orthop Trauma. 1994;8(2):81–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Suedkamp NP, et al. The incidence of osteitis in open fractures: an analysis of 948 open fractures (a review of the Hannover experience). J Orthop Trauma. 1993;7(5):473–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Godina M. Early microsurgical reconstruction of complex trauma of the extremities. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;78(3):285–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gopal S, et al. Fix and flap: the radical orthopaedic and plastic treatment of severe open fractures of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82(7):959–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rajasekaran S, Sabapathy SR. A philosophy of care of open injuries based on the Ganga hospital score. Injury. 2007;38(2):137–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Godina M, Arnez ZM, Lister GD. Preferential use of the posterior approach to blood vessels of the lower leg in microvascular surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;88(2):287–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Godina M. The tailored latissimus dorsi free flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;80(2):304–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Court-Brown CM et al. The management of open tibial fractures. In: BOA/BAPS working party. September London: 1997.

  23. British Orthopaedic Association and British Association of Plastic Surgeons. The early management of severe tibial fractures: the need for combined plastic and orthopaedic management: a Report by the BOA/BAPS Working Party on Severe Tibial Injuries. London: The Associations; 1993.

  24. Hope PG, Cole WG. Open fractures of the tibia in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74:546–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cullen MC, et al. Open fracture of the tibia in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:1039–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Caudle RJ, Stern PJ. Severe open fractures of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69:801–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yehuda U, et al. The revised reconstructive ladder and its applications for high energy injuries to the extremities. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56:401–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

S. Rajasekaran, S. Raja Sabapathy, Dheenadhayalan J, S R Sundarajan, Hari Venkatramani, A Devendra, P Ramesh and K P Srikanth declare that they have no conflict of Interest.

Compliance with ethical requirements

This study was approved by Institutional Review Board.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Rajasekaran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rajasekaran, S., Sabapathy, S.R., Dheenadhayalan, J. et al. Ganga hospital open injury score in management of open injuries. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 41, 3–15 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-014-0465-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-014-0465-9

Keywords

Navigation