Skip to main content
Log in

Management of neglected acetabular fractures

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Management of neglected acetabular fractures is a difficult task. Osteosynthesis in such cases may not be an ideal solution because of the femoral head damage due to pressure by the fractured acetabular edge, avascular necrosis, difficulty in mobilizing the fragments due to callus formation, difficulty in indirect reduction of the fracture fragments and macerated acetabular fragments all contributing to inadequate fracture reduction. Majority of such fractures are now treated with total hip replacement. While treating such fractures with THR, problems associated with neglected acetabular fractures such as fracture non-union, hip dislocation, protrusio, cavitary bone defect or peripheral bone defect must be considered. 3D computed tomography scan provides a clear view about the acetabular and periacetabular bony anatomy. Impaction grafting and antiprotrusio cage or ring with a cemented acetabular cup can address most of the hip protrusio and cavitary bone defects. Segmental bone defect needs cortical strut-bone graft fixation and subsequent implantation of a cemented or uncemented acetabular cup implantation. Fracture non-union needs approximate reduction and fixation with plates followed by bone grafting and implantation of an acetabular cup. Despite these efforts, the outcome of THR in neglected acetabular fracture is considerable worse than after conventional hip replacement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Matta JM. Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:1632–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Madhu R, Kotnis R, Al-Mousawi A, Barlow N, Deo S, Worlock P, Willett K. Outcome of surgery for reconstruction of fractures of the acetabulum. The time dependent effect of delay. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(9):1197–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Letournel E. Surgical repair of acetabular fractures more than three weeks after injury, apart from total hip replacement. Int Orthop. 1979;2(4):305–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson EE, Matta JM, Mast JW, et al. Delayed reconstruction of acetabular fractures 21–120 days following injury. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;305:20–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mayo KA, Letournel E, Matta JM, et al. Surgical revision of malreduced acetabular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;305:47–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dean DB, Moed BR. Late salvage of failed open reduction and internal fixation of posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23(3):180–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bircher M, Lewis A, Halder S. Delays in definitive reconstruction of complex pelvic and acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(9):1137–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sen RK, Veerappa LA. Long-term outcome of conservatively managed displaced acetabular fractures. J Trauma. 2009;67(1):155–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zha GC, Sun JY, Chen L, Zheng HM, Wang Q, Jin Y. Late reconstruction of posterior acetabular wall fractures using iliac crest. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72(5):1386–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mears DC, Velyvis JH. Primary total hip arthroplasty after acetabular fracture. Instr Course Lect. 2001;50:335–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schreurs BW, Zengerink M, Welten ML, van Kampen A, Slooff TJ. Bone impaction grafting and a cemented cup after acetabular fracture at 3–18 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;437:145–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Romness DW, Lewallen DG. Total hip arthroplasty after fracture of the acetabulum. Long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72(5):761–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bronsema E, Te Stroet MA, Zengerink M, van Kampen A, Schreurs BW. Impaction bone grafting and a cemented cup after acetabular fracture. Int Orthop. 2014 Jun 26. [Epub ahead of print].

  14. Berry DJ, Halasy M. Uncemented acetabular components for arthritis after acetabular fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;405:164–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bellabarba C, Berger RA, Bentley CD, Quigley LR, Jacobs JJ, Rosenberg AG, Sheinkop MB, Galante JO. Cementless acetabular reconstruction after acetabular fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A(6):868–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Iotov A, Ivanov V, Tzachev N, Baltov A, Liliyanov D, Kraevsky P, Band Z, Kostov D. Primary total hip replacement after neglected acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94-B(Supp XXXVII):291.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Halawa M, Sadek FZ. Total hip replacement in neglected fractures of the acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90-B(Supp II):302.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Lokesh Veerappa, Sujit Kumar Tripathy and Ramesh Kumar Sen declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

This article has been prepared in compliance with ethics guidelines. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. K. Tripathy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Veerappa, L.A., Tripathy, S.K. & Sen, R.K. Management of neglected acetabular fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 41, 343–348 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-014-0462-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-014-0462-z

Keywords

Navigation