Skip to main content
Log in

Five years experience of trauma care in a German urban level I university trauma center

  • Focus on Diagnostic and Prognosis of Severely Traumatized Patients
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background:

A regionalized approach to trauma care with the implementation of designated level I trauma centers has been shown to improve survival after multiple injuries. Our study aimed to describe the current reality in an urban German level I university trauma center concerning the primary admission of patients into the emergency room.

Materials and Methods:

We performed a retrospective analysis of all multiple trauma patients that were prospectively documented in our documentation system TraumaWatch® from 2003 to 2007. Documentation included physiological findings as well as diagnostic and therapeutic procedures structured as: (A) preclinical phase; (B) emergency room treatment; (C) intensive care unit; and (D) final outcome according to the German Trauma Registry.

Results:

In total, 1,848 patients were completely documented and, thus, analyzed. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 16.5 ± 14.1 points and the mean ± SD age was 38.7 ± 21.9 years. An increasing number of patients received whole-body computed tomography (48.8% in 2003 vs. 83.3%in 2007, p < 0.001) and, on average, the ISS increased over the years (14.4 points in 2003 vs. 17.9 points in 2007). The overall hospital mortality was 7.1%, without significant change over time. The completionofimagingdiagnostics became significantly faster for all of the documented procedures (X-ray pelvis, X-ray chest, whole-body CT, abdominal ultrasound) (p < 0.001).

Discussion:

Descriptive data on the current reality in urban level I trauma care can be derived from our study. Additionally, we achieved improved time intervals for emergency diagnostics and treatment, while hospital mortality remained constant, despite a higher injury severity. This is due to a standardized protocol which is applied during the 24-h in-house attending coverage.

Conclusion:

Regionalized trauma care with designated level I trauma centers is justified by the improvement of time intervals and outcome, but adequate resources are required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Resources for optimal care of the injured patient: 1999. Chicago: American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma, 1998.

  2. Weißbuch Schwerverletzten-Versorgung. Berlin: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie e.V., 2006.

  3. MacKenzie EJ, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ, Nathens AB, Frey KP, Egleston BL, Salkever DS, Scharfstein DO. A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. N Engl J Med 2006;354:366–378.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cornwell EE 3rd, Chang DC, Phillips J, Campbell KA. Enhanced trauma program commitment at a level I trauma center: effect on the process and outcome of care. Arch Surg 2003;138:838–843.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nathens AB, Jurkovich GJ, Cummings P, Rivara FP, Maier RV. The effect of organized systems of trauma care on motor vehicle crash mortality. JAMA 2000;283:1990–1994.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. MacKenzie EJ, Hoyt DB, Sacra JC, Jurkovich GJ, Carlini AR, Teitelbaum SD, Teter H Jr. National inventory of hospital trauma centers. JAMA 2003;289:1515–1522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kühne CA, Ruchholtz S, Buschmann C, Sturm J, Lackner CK, Wentzensen A, Bouillon B, Waydhas C, Weber C; AG Polytrauma DGU. Trauma centers in Germany. Status report. Unfallchirurg 2006;109:357–366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. http://www.traumaregister.de. Committee on Emergency Medicine, Intensive and Trauma Care (Section NIS) of the German Society for Trauma Surgery.

  9. Baker SP, O'Neill B, Haddon W Jr, Long WB. The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma 1974;14:187–196.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Abbreviated injury scale (AIS) 1990 Revision — update 1998. Barlington: Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, 1998.

  11. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 1974;2:81–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Prokop A, Hötte H, Krüger K, Rehm KE, Isenberg J, Schiffer G. Multislice CT in diagnostic work-up of polytrauma. Unfallchirurg 2006;109:545–550.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wurmb TE, Frühwald P, Hopfner W, Keil T, Kredel M, Brederlau J, Roewer N, Kuhnigk H. Whole-body multislice computed tomography as the first line diagnostic tool in patients with multiple injuries: the focus on time. J Trauma 2009;66:658–665.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Weninger P, Mauritz W, Fridrich P, Spitaler R, Figl M, Kern B, Hertz H. Emergency room management of patients with blunt major trauma: evaluation of the multislice computed tomography protocol exemplified by an urban trauma center. J Trauma 2007;62:584–591.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ruchholtz S, Lefering R, Paffrath T, Oestern HJ, Neugebauer E, Nast-Kolb D, Pape HC, Bouillon B. Reduction in mortality of severely injured patients in Germany. Dtsch Arztebl 2008;105:225–231.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Karl-Georga K, Huber-Wagner S, Kay MV, Qvick M, Lefering R, Qvick LM, Körner M, Reiser M, Mutschler W. Whole body computed tomography during trauma resuscitation — effect on outcome. Lancet 2009 (in press).

  17. Henderson KI, Coats TJ, Hassan TB, Brohi K. Audit of time to emergency trauma laparotomy. Br J Surg 2000;87:472–476.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ruchholtz S, Waydhas C, Aufmkolk M, Täger G, Piepenbrink K, Stolke D, Nast-Kolb D. Interdisciplinary quality management in the treatment of severely injured patients. Validation of a QM system for the diagnostic and therapeutic process in early clinical management. Unfallchirurg 2001;104:927–937.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nast-Kolb D, Ruchholtz S, Waydhas C, Taeger G. Management of polytrauma. Chirurg 2006;77:861–872;quiz 873.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cowley RA. The resuscitation and stabilization of major multiple trauma patients in a trauma center environment. Clin Med 1976;83:16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bernhard M, Becker TK, Nowe T, Mohorovicic M, Sikinger M, Brenner T, Richter GM, Radeleff B, Meeder PJ, Büchler MW, Böttiger BW, Martin E, Gries A. Introduction of a treatment algorithm can improve the early management of emergency patients in the resuscitation room. Resuscitation 2007;73:362–373.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. DGU T. Jahresbericht 2008 für den Zeitraum bis Ende 2007 für das Zentrum für Chirurgie der Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität. 2008.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ingo Marzi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wyen, H., Wutzler, S., Rüsseler, M. et al. Five years experience of trauma care in a German urban level I university trauma center. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 35, 448–454 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-009-9140-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-009-9140-y

Key Words

Navigation