Skip to main content
Log in

Do Contrast-Fill Patterns Immediately After Coil Embolization of Small Saccular Aneurysms Impact Long-Term Results?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

It is generally accepted that filling of a saccular aneurysm with contrast immediately after coil embolization predisposes to later recanalization. However, not all such scenarios evolve similarly over time. We investigated outcomes of small (≤ 7 mm) aneurysms with contrast-filled sacs immediately after coil embolization, evaluating the impact of pattern and degree of filling on subsequent recanalization.

Methods

Between January, 2008 and December, 2010, 186 small (≤ 7 mm) saccular aneurysms that retained contrast after coil embolization accrued for this study. Lesions were categorized by pattern (eccentric vs. concentric) and degree of filling on working projections. Clinical and morphologic factors were also analyzed to assess impact on subsequent recanalization. Morphologic outcomes at 6 months or more were assessed.

Results

In 93.5 % (174/186) of aneurysms with visible contrast retention, complete occlusion was evident on follow-up imaging studies at 6 months. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that eccentric (vs. concentric) contrast filling carried greater risk of subsequent recanalization (p = 0.020). Stent placement and progressive occlusion were also linked, falling short of statistical significance (p = 0.089). Of 166 progressively occluded aneurysms followed for more than 12 months (mean, 30.8 ± 7.3 months), 158 (95.2 %) exhibited stable occlusion.

Conclusion

Small (≤ 7 mm) aneurysms that retain contrast immediately after coil embolization are more likely to become completely occluded over time through progressive thrombosis. However, an eccentric fill pattern may predispose to recanalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hwang G, Jung C, Sheen SH, Park H, Kang HS, Lee SH, Oh CW, Chung YS, Han MH, Kwon OK. Two-year follow-up of contrast stasis within the sac in unruptured aneurysm coil embolization: progressive thrombosis or enlargement? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31(10):1929–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mascitelli JR, Moyle H, Oermann EK, Polykarpou MF, Patel AA, Doshi AH, Gologorsky Y, Bederson JB, Patel AB. An update to the Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification of intracranial aneurysms treated with coil embolization. J Neurointerv Surg 2014;7(7):496–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Roy D, Milot G, Raymond J. Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke. 2001;32(9):1998–2004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Raymond J, Guilbert F, Weill A, Georganos SA, Juravsky L, Lambert A, Lamoureux J, Chagnon M, Roy D. Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke. 2003;34(6):1398–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms—risk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(24):1725–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Joo SW, Lee SL, Noh SJ, Jeong YG, Kim MS, Jeong YT. What is the significance of a large number of ruptured aneurysms smaller than 7 mm in diamter? J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2009;45(2):85–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Cho YD, Lee WJ, Kim KM, Kang HS, Kim JE, Han MH. Endovascular coil embolization of middle cerebral artery aneurysms of the proximal (M1) segment. Neuroradiology. 2013;55(9):1097–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kang HS, Han MH, Kwon BJ, Jung C, Kim JE, Kwon OK, Oh CW. Is clopidogrel premedication useful to reduce thromboembolic events during coil embolization for unruptured intracranial aneurysms? Neurosurgery. 2010;67:1371–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gao B, Baharoglu MI, Cohen AD, Malek AM. Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial bifurcation aneurysms leads to immediate and delayed intracranial vascular angle remodeling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33(4):649–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gallas S, Januel AC, Pasco A, Drouineau J, Gabrillargues J, Gaston A, Cognard C, Herbreteau D. Long-term follow-up of. 1036 cerebral aneurysms treated by bare coils: a multicentric cohort treated between 1998 and 2003. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30(10):1986–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cho YD, Lee JY, Seo JH, Kang HS, Kim JE, Kwon OK, Chung YS, Han MH. Early recurrent hemorrhage after coil embolization in ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neuroradiology. 2012;54(7):719–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee D, Yuki I, Murayama Y, Chiang A, Nishimura I, Vinters HV, Wang CJ, Nien YL, Ishil A, Wu BM, Viñuela F. Thrombus organization and healing in the swine experimental aneurysm model. Part I. A histological and molecular analysis. J Neurosurg. 2007;107(1):94–108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Abdihalim M, Watanabe M, Chaudhry SA, Jagadeesan B, Suri MF, Qureshi AI. Are coil compaction and aneurysmal growth two distinct etiologies leading to recurrence following endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysm? J Neuroimaging. 2014;24(2):171–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cho YD, Lee JY, Seo JH, Lee SJ, Kang HS, Kim JE, Son YJ, Jung KH, Kwon OK, Han MH. Does stent implantation improve the result of repeat embolization in recanalized aneurysms? Neurosurgery. 2012;71(2 Suppl Operative):ons253–9.

  15. Jahshan S, Abla AA, Natarajan SK, Drummond PS, Kan P, Karmon Y, Snyder KV, Hopkins LN, Siddiqui AH, Levy EI. Results of stent-assisted vs non-stent-assisted endovascular therapies in 489 cerebral aneurysms: single-center experience. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(2):232–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chalouhi N, Jabbour P, Gonzalez LF, Dumont AS, Rosenwasser R, Starke RM, Gordon D, Hann S, Tjoumakaris S. Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of basilar tip aneurysms by coiling with and without stent assistance: a review of 235 cases. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(4):785–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lopes D, Sani S. Histological postmortem study of an internal carotid artery aneurysm treated with the Neuroform stent. Neurosurgery. 2005;56(2):E416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang QH, Wu YF, Xu Y, Hong B, Zhang L, Liu JM. Vascular geometry change because of endovascular stent placement for anterior communicating artery aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32(9):1721–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cho YD, Kim KM, Lee WJ, Sohn CH, Kang HS, Kim JE, Han MH. Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography for follow-up of coil embolization with enterprise stent for intracranial aneurysm: usefulness of source images. Korean J Radio. 2014;15(1):161–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pierot L, Portefaix C, Boulin A, Gauvrit JY. Follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: comparison of 3D time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3 T in a large, prospective series. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:2255–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Agid R, Willinsky RA, Lee SK, Terbrugge KG, Farb RI. Characterization of aneurysm remnants after endovascular treatment: contrast-enhanced MR angiography versus catheter digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29(8):1570–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nakiri GS, Santos AC, Abud TG, Aragon DC, Colli BO, Abud DG. A comparison between magnetic resonance angiography at 3 teslas (time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced) and flat-panel digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of embolized brain aneurysms. Clinics. 2011;66(4):641–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ferre JC, Carsin-Nicol B, Morandi X, Carsin M, de Kersaint-Gilly A, Gauvrit JY, Desal HA. Time-of-flight MR angiography at 3 T versus digital subtraction angiography in the imaging follow-up of 51 intracranial aneurysms treated with coils. Eur J Radiol. 2009;72(3):365–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Yoon-Kyung Choi for preparation of the illustrations.

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y.D. Cho MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jeon, J., Cho, Y., Rhim, J. et al. Do Contrast-Fill Patterns Immediately After Coil Embolization of Small Saccular Aneurysms Impact Long-Term Results?. Clin Neuroradiol 27, 205–211 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-015-0485-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-015-0485-9

Keywords

Navigation