Abstract
Purpose
It is generally accepted that filling of a saccular aneurysm with contrast immediately after coil embolization predisposes to later recanalization. However, not all such scenarios evolve similarly over time. We investigated outcomes of small (≤ 7 mm) aneurysms with contrast-filled sacs immediately after coil embolization, evaluating the impact of pattern and degree of filling on subsequent recanalization.
Methods
Between January, 2008 and December, 2010, 186 small (≤ 7 mm) saccular aneurysms that retained contrast after coil embolization accrued for this study. Lesions were categorized by pattern (eccentric vs. concentric) and degree of filling on working projections. Clinical and morphologic factors were also analyzed to assess impact on subsequent recanalization. Morphologic outcomes at 6 months or more were assessed.
Results
In 93.5 % (174/186) of aneurysms with visible contrast retention, complete occlusion was evident on follow-up imaging studies at 6 months. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that eccentric (vs. concentric) contrast filling carried greater risk of subsequent recanalization (p = 0.020). Stent placement and progressive occlusion were also linked, falling short of statistical significance (p = 0.089). Of 166 progressively occluded aneurysms followed for more than 12 months (mean, 30.8 ± 7.3 months), 158 (95.2 %) exhibited stable occlusion.
Conclusion
Small (≤ 7 mm) aneurysms that retain contrast immediately after coil embolization are more likely to become completely occluded over time through progressive thrombosis. However, an eccentric fill pattern may predispose to recanalization.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hwang G, Jung C, Sheen SH, Park H, Kang HS, Lee SH, Oh CW, Chung YS, Han MH, Kwon OK. Two-year follow-up of contrast stasis within the sac in unruptured aneurysm coil embolization: progressive thrombosis or enlargement? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31(10):1929–34.
Mascitelli JR, Moyle H, Oermann EK, Polykarpou MF, Patel AA, Doshi AH, Gologorsky Y, Bederson JB, Patel AB. An update to the Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification of intracranial aneurysms treated with coil embolization. J Neurointerv Surg 2014;7(7):496–502
Roy D, Milot G, Raymond J. Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke. 2001;32(9):1998–2004.
Raymond J, Guilbert F, Weill A, Georganos SA, Juravsky L, Lambert A, Lamoureux J, Chagnon M, Roy D. Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke. 2003;34(6):1398–403.
International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms—risk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(24):1725–33.
Joo SW, Lee SL, Noh SJ, Jeong YG, Kim MS, Jeong YT. What is the significance of a large number of ruptured aneurysms smaller than 7 mm in diamter? J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2009;45(2):85–9.
Cho YD, Lee WJ, Kim KM, Kang HS, Kim JE, Han MH. Endovascular coil embolization of middle cerebral artery aneurysms of the proximal (M1) segment. Neuroradiology. 2013;55(9):1097–102.
Kang HS, Han MH, Kwon BJ, Jung C, Kim JE, Kwon OK, Oh CW. Is clopidogrel premedication useful to reduce thromboembolic events during coil embolization for unruptured intracranial aneurysms? Neurosurgery. 2010;67:1371–6.
Gao B, Baharoglu MI, Cohen AD, Malek AM. Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial bifurcation aneurysms leads to immediate and delayed intracranial vascular angle remodeling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33(4):649–54.
Gallas S, Januel AC, Pasco A, Drouineau J, Gabrillargues J, Gaston A, Cognard C, Herbreteau D. Long-term follow-up of. 1036 cerebral aneurysms treated by bare coils: a multicentric cohort treated between 1998 and 2003. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30(10):1986–92.
Cho YD, Lee JY, Seo JH, Kang HS, Kim JE, Kwon OK, Chung YS, Han MH. Early recurrent hemorrhage after coil embolization in ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neuroradiology. 2012;54(7):719–26.
Lee D, Yuki I, Murayama Y, Chiang A, Nishimura I, Vinters HV, Wang CJ, Nien YL, Ishil A, Wu BM, Viñuela F. Thrombus organization and healing in the swine experimental aneurysm model. Part I. A histological and molecular analysis. J Neurosurg. 2007;107(1):94–108.
Abdihalim M, Watanabe M, Chaudhry SA, Jagadeesan B, Suri MF, Qureshi AI. Are coil compaction and aneurysmal growth two distinct etiologies leading to recurrence following endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysm? J Neuroimaging. 2014;24(2):171–5.
Cho YD, Lee JY, Seo JH, Lee SJ, Kang HS, Kim JE, Son YJ, Jung KH, Kwon OK, Han MH. Does stent implantation improve the result of repeat embolization in recanalized aneurysms? Neurosurgery. 2012;71(2 Suppl Operative):ons253–9.
Jahshan S, Abla AA, Natarajan SK, Drummond PS, Kan P, Karmon Y, Snyder KV, Hopkins LN, Siddiqui AH, Levy EI. Results of stent-assisted vs non-stent-assisted endovascular therapies in 489 cerebral aneurysms: single-center experience. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(2):232–9.
Chalouhi N, Jabbour P, Gonzalez LF, Dumont AS, Rosenwasser R, Starke RM, Gordon D, Hann S, Tjoumakaris S. Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of basilar tip aneurysms by coiling with and without stent assistance: a review of 235 cases. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(4):785–94.
Lopes D, Sani S. Histological postmortem study of an internal carotid artery aneurysm treated with the Neuroform stent. Neurosurgery. 2005;56(2):E416.
Huang QH, Wu YF, Xu Y, Hong B, Zhang L, Liu JM. Vascular geometry change because of endovascular stent placement for anterior communicating artery aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32(9):1721–5.
Cho YD, Kim KM, Lee WJ, Sohn CH, Kang HS, Kim JE, Han MH. Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography for follow-up of coil embolization with enterprise stent for intracranial aneurysm: usefulness of source images. Korean J Radio. 2014;15(1):161–8.
Pierot L, Portefaix C, Boulin A, Gauvrit JY. Follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: comparison of 3D time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3 T in a large, prospective series. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:2255–63.
Agid R, Willinsky RA, Lee SK, Terbrugge KG, Farb RI. Characterization of aneurysm remnants after endovascular treatment: contrast-enhanced MR angiography versus catheter digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29(8):1570–4.
Nakiri GS, Santos AC, Abud TG, Aragon DC, Colli BO, Abud DG. A comparison between magnetic resonance angiography at 3 teslas (time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced) and flat-panel digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of embolized brain aneurysms. Clinics. 2011;66(4):641–8.
Ferre JC, Carsin-Nicol B, Morandi X, Carsin M, de Kersaint-Gilly A, Gauvrit JY, Desal HA. Time-of-flight MR angiography at 3 T versus digital subtraction angiography in the imaging follow-up of 51 intracranial aneurysms treated with coils. Eur J Radiol. 2009;72(3):365–9.
Acknowledgments
We thank Yoon-Kyung Choi for preparation of the illustrations.
Conflict of interest
We declare that we have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jeon, J., Cho, Y., Rhim, J. et al. Do Contrast-Fill Patterns Immediately After Coil Embolization of Small Saccular Aneurysms Impact Long-Term Results?. Clin Neuroradiol 27, 205–211 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-015-0485-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-015-0485-9