Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoskopische Chirurgie des Kolonkarzinoms

Qualitätsanforderungen an die (erweiterte) Hemikolektomie rechts

Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer

Quality requirements for (extended) right hemicolectomy

  • Übersichten
  • Published:
coloproctology Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Die aktuellen S3-Leitlinien zur chirurgischen Therapie des kolorektalen Karzinoms halten fest, dass bei geeigneter Selektion und Expertise des Operateurs laparoskopisch die gleichen onkologischen Ergebnisse wie beim offenen Verfahren erreicht werden können. Dies bedingt, dass an beide Methoden die gleichen Qualitätsanforderungen zu stellen sind. Die wichtigsten Qualitätsparameter der rechtsseitigen (erweiterten) Hemikolektomie sind die tatsächlich zentrale Durchtrennung der versorgenden Arterien (A. ileocolica, rechter Ast der A. colica media bzw. A. colica media selbst) unmittelbar am Abgang des zentralwärtigen Gefäßes (A. mesenterica superior bzw. A. colica media) sowie die scharfe Präparation des Mesokolons ohne jegliche Präparateinrisse. Die Fotodokumentation der frischen Operationspräparate zur Kategorisierung der Präparationsqualität sowie auch zur Bestimmung der Gefäßpedikel erfasst diese Qualitätsparameter und ist zugleich der derzeit beste Surrogatparameter, um hieraus die onkologische Qualität der jeweiligen Operation zu bewerten. Hierbei bestehen nicht nur bei dem laparoskopischen Vorgehen, sondern auch beim offenen Operieren derzeit flächendeckend noch erhebliche Defizite, welche dringend zu beheben sind.

Abstract

The current S3 guidelines on the surgical treatment of colorectal cancer note that with a suitable patient selection and expertise of the surgeon the same oncological results can be achieved laparoscopically as with the open procedure. This requires that the same quality requirements have to be provided for both methods. The most important quality parameters of right sided (extended) hemicolectomy are central ligation of the supplying arteries (ileocolic artery, right branch of the middle colic artery and middle colic artery) flush to the central origin of the vessel (superior mesenteric artery or middle colic artery) and the sharp dissection of the mesocolon without any preparation tears. The photographic documentation of the fresh surgical specimens for categorizing the preparation quality as well as to determine the pedicle of the vessel can capture this quality well and is also currently the best surrogate parameter to evaluate the oncological quality of the operation. At present, there are still considerable widespread deficits not only with the laparoscopic approach but also in open surgery which must be urgently fixed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Benz S (2013) Anzahl der Lymphknoten bei rechtsseitiger Hemikolektomie in Abhängigkeit einer kompletten mesocolischen Exzision (CME). 130. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Chirurgie. München, 30.04.-03.05.2013. GMS Publishing House; Düsseldorf 1–2. doi:10.3205/13dgch034

  2. Bae SU, Saklani AP, Lim DR et al (2014) Laparoscopic-assisted versus open complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation for right-sided colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. doi:10.1245/s10434-014-3614-9

  3. Benson AB, Schrag D (2004) American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:3408–3419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Benz S (2013) Survival after Complete Mesocolic Excision (CME) for right sided colon-cancer compared to standard surgery. Open Surg J 7:6–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bertelsen CA (2014) Lymph node metastases in the gastrocolic ligament in patients with colon cancer. (publication in process)

  6. Bertelsen CA, Bols B, Ingeholm P et al (2011) Can the quality of colonic surgery be improved by standardization of surgical technique with complete mesocolic excision? Colorectal Dis 13:1123–1129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Galizia G, Lieto E, Vita F et al (2013) Is complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation safe and effective in the surgical treatment of right-sided colon cancers? A prospective study. Int J Colorectal Dis 29:89–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Goligher J (1984) Incidence and pathology of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon, 5. Aufl. Balliére Tindall, London, S 445

  9. Gouvas N, Pechlivanides G, Zervakis N et al (2012) Complete mesocolic excision in colon cancer surgery: a comparison between open and laparoscopic approach. Colorectal Dis 14:1357–1364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F et al (2013) Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 100:75–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heald RJ (1988) The ‚Holy Plane‘ of rectal surgery. J R Soc Med 81:503–508

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K et al (2009) Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation – technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis 11:354–365

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kobayashi H, West NP, Takahashi K et al (2014) Quality of surgery for stage III colon cancer: comparison between England, Germany, and Japan. Ann Surg Oncol. doi:10.1245/s10434-014-3578-9

  14. Kuhry E, Schwenk W, Gaupset R et al (2008) Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD003432

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Le Voyer TE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL et al (2003) Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol 21:2912–2919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Leite J, Martins S, Oliveira J et al (2011) Clinical significance of macroscopic completeness of mesorectal resection in rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 13:381–386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF): S3-Leitlinie Kolorektales Karzinom, Langversion 1.0, AWMF-Registrierungsnummer: 021-007OL. http://leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/Leitlinien.1.0.html.

  18. Nagtegaal I, Quirke P (2008) What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol 26:303–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Perrakis A, Weber K, Hohenberger W (2014) Lymph node metastasis of carcinomas of transverse colon including flexures. Consideration of the extramesocolic lymph node stations. (publication in process)

  20. Quirke P (2003) Training and quality assurance for rectal cancer: 20 years of data is enough. Lancet Oncol 4:695–702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Quirke P et al (2009) Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet 373:821–828

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tan KY, Kawamura YJ, Mizokami K et al (2010) Distribution of the first metastatic lymph node in colon cancer and its clinical significance. Colorectal Dis 12:44–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Toyota S, Ohta H, Anazawa S (1995) Rationale for extent of lymph node dissection for right colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 38:705–711

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Weber K, Merkel S, Perrakis A, Hohenberger W (2012) Is there a disadvantage to radical lymph node dissection in colon cancer? Int J Colorectal Dis. doi:10.1007/s00384-012-1564-x

  25. West NP, Hohenberger W, Weber K et al (2010) Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colon. J Clin Oncol 28:272–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. West NP, Kobayashi H, Takahashi K et al (2012) Understanding optimal colonic cancer surgery: comparison of Japanese D3 resection and European complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation. J Clin Oncol 30:1763–1769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. West NP, Morris EJ, Rotimi O et al (2008) Pathology grading of colon cancer surgical resection and its association with survival: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Oncol 9:857–865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hohenberger W, Lux P, Merkel S et al (2011) Lymphknotendissektion bei Karzinomen des unteren Gastrointestinaltraktes. Chirurg 82:1096–1105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Lux.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

P. Lux, K. Weber und W. Hohenberger geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Additional information

Dieser Beitrag wurde erstpubliziert in Der Chirurg (2014) 85:593–598.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lux, P., Weber, K. & Hohenberger, W. Laparoskopische Chirurgie des Kolonkarzinoms. coloproctology 37, 325–331 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00053-015-0022-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00053-015-0022-y

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation