Abstract
Social insect colonies adeptly make consensus decisions that emerge from distributed interactions among colony members. How consensus is accomplished when a split decision requires resolution is poorly understood. We studied colony reunification during emigrations of the crevice-dwelling ant Temnothorax rugatulus. Colonies can choose the most preferred of several alternative nest cavities, but the colony sometimes initially splits between sites and achieves consensus later via secondary emigrations. We explored the decision rules that govern reunification using artificially split colonies. When monogynous colonies were evenly divided between identical sites, the location of the queen played a decisive role, with 14 of the 16 colonies reuniting at the site that held the queen. This suggests a group-level strategy for minimizing risk to the queen by avoiding unnecessary moves. When the queen was placed in the less preferred of two sites, all 14 colonies that reunited did so at the preferred nest, despite having to move the queen. These results show that colonies balance multiple factors when reaching consensus, and that preferences for physical features of the environment can outweigh the queen’s influence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alloway TM, Buschinger A, Talbot M et al (1982) Polygyny and polydomy in three North American species of the ant genus Leptothorax Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche J Entomol 89:249–274. doi:10.1155/1982/64124
Altshuler E, Ramos O, Núñez Y et al (2005) Symmetry breaking in escaping ants. Am Nat 166:643–649. doi:10.1086/498139
Bhatkar A, Whitcomb WH (1970) Artificial diet for rearing various species of ants. Fla Entomol 53:229–232. doi:10.2307/3493193
Bouchet DC, Peeters C, Fisher BL, Molet M (2013) Both female castes contribute to colony emigration in the polygynous ant Mystrium oberthueri. Ecol Entomol 38:408–417. doi:10.1111/een.12033
Camazine S, Deneubourg J-L, Franks NR et al (2001) Self-organization in biological systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Cao TT (2013) High social density increases foraging and scouting rates and induces polydomy in Temnothorax ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:1799–1807. doi:10.1007/s00265-013-1587-5
Cao TT, Dornhaus A (2012) Ants use pheromone markings in emigrations to move closer to food-rich areas. Insectes Soc 59:87–92. doi:10.1007/s00040-011-0192-8
Conradt L, Roper TJ (2005) Consensus decision making in animals. Trends Ecol Evol 20:449–456. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.008
Cronin AL (2012) Consensus decision making in the ant Myrmecina nipponica: house-hunters combine pheromone trails with quorum responses. Anim Behav 84:1243–1251. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.08.036
Cronin AL (2013) Synergy between pheromone trails and quorum thresholds underlies consensus decisions in the ant Myrmecina nipponica. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:1643–1651. doi:10.1007/s00265-013-1575-9
Debout G, Schatz B, Elias M, Mckey D (2007) Polydomy in ants: what we know, what we think we know, and what remains to be done. Biol J Linn Soc 90:319–348. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00728.x
Detrain C, Deneubourg J-L (2008) Collective decision-making and foraging patterns in ants and honeybees. Adv Insect Physiol 35:123–173. doi:10.1016/S0065-2806(08)00002-7
Dornhaus A, Franks NR, Hawkins RM, Shere HNS (2004) Ants move to improve: colonies of Leptothorax albipennis emigrate whenever they find a superior nest site. Anim Behav 67:959–963. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.09.004
Dyer JRG, Ioannou CC, Morrell LJ et al (2008) Consensus decision making in human crowds. Anim Behav 75:461–470. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.05.010
Enríquez ML, Abril S, Díaz M, Gómez C (2013) Nest site selection by the Argentine ant and suitability of artificial nests as a control tool. Insect Soc 60:507–516
Evison SEF, Webster KA, Hughes WOH (2012) Better the nest site you know: decision-making during nest migrations by the Pharaoh’s ant. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66:711–720. doi:10.1007/s00265-012-1319-2
Franks NR, Sendova-Franks AB (2000) Queen transport during ant colony emigration: a group-level adaptive behavior. Behav Ecol 11:315–318. doi:10.1093/beheco/11.3.315
Franks NR, Pratt SC, Mallon EB et al (2002) Information flow, opinion polling and collective intelligence in house-hunting social insects. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 357:1567–1583. doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1066
Franks NR, Dornhaus A, Fitzsimmons JP, Stevens M (2003a) Speed versus accuracy in collective decision making. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 270:2457–2463. doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2527
Franks NR, Mallon EB, Bray HE et al (2003b) Strategies for choosing between alternatives with different attributes: exemplified by house-hunting ants. Anim Behav 65:215–223. doi:10.1006/anbe.2002.2032
Franks NR, Dornhaus A, Metherell BG et al (2006) Not everything that counts can be counted: ants use multiple metrics for a single nest trait. Proc Biol Sci 273:165. doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3312
Franks NR, Dornhaus A, Hitchcock G et al (2007) Avoidance of conspecific colonies during nest choice by ants. Anim Behav 73:525–534. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.05.020
Franks NR, Hardcastle KA, Collins S et al (2008) Can ant colonies choose a far-and-away better nest over an in-the-way poor one? Anim Behav 76:323–334. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.02.009
Franks NR, Richardson TO, Stroeymeyt N et al (2013) Speed-cohesion trade-offs in collective decision making in ants and the concept of precision in animal behaviour. Anim Behav 85:1233–1244. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.03.010
Heinze J, Rüppell O (2014) The frequency of multi-queen colonies increases with altitude in a Nearctic ant. Ecol Entomol 39:527–529. doi:10.1111/een.12119
Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Jeanson R, Deneubourg J-L, Grimal A, Theraulaz G (2004) Modulation of individual behavior and collective decision-making during aggregation site selection by the ant Messor barbarus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:388–394. doi:10.1007/s00265-003-0716-y
Jeanson R, Rivault C, Deneubourg J-L et al (2005) Self-organized aggregation in cockroaches. Anim Behav 69:169–180. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.02.009
Kameda T, Wisdom T, Toyokawa W, Inukai K (2012) Is consensus-seeking unique to humans? A selective review of animal group decision-making and its implications for (human) social psychology. Group Process Intergroup Relat 15:673–689. doi:10.1177/1368430212451863
Kaur R, Anoop K, Sumana A (2012) Leaders follow leaders to reunite the colony: relocation dynamics of an Indian queenless ant in its natural habitat. Anim Behav 83:1345–1353. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.02.022
Lanan MC, Dornhaus A, Bronstein JL (2011) The function of polydomy: the ant Crematogaster torosa preferentially forms new nests near food sources and fortifies outstations. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:959–968. doi:10.1007/s00265-010-1096-8
Lioni A, Deneubourg J-L (2004) Collective decision through self-assembling. Naturwissenschaften 91:237–241. doi:10.1007/s00114-004-0519-7
Mallon EB, Pratt SC, Franks NR (2001) Individual and collective decision-making during nest site selection by the ant Leptothorax albipennis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:352–359. doi:10.1007/s002650100377
McGlynn TP (2012) The ecology of nest movement in social insects. Annu Rev Entomol 57:291–308. doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-120710-100708
Minter NJ, Sendova-Franks AB, Franks NR (2013) Nest-seeking rock ants (Temnothorax albipennis) trade off sediment packing density and structural integrity for ease of cavity excavation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:1745–1756. doi:10.1007/s00265-013-1582-x
Mitrus S (2014) The cavity-nest ant Temnothorax crassispinus prefers larger nests. Insectes Soc 62:43–49. doi:10.1007/s00040-014-0372-4
Nicolis SC, Deneubourg J-L (1999) Emerging patterns and food recruitment in ants: an analytical study. J Theor Biol 198:575–592. doi:10.1006/jtbi.1999.0934
Partridge LW, Partridge KA, Franks NR (1997) Field survey of a monogynous leptothoracine ant (Hymenoptera, Formicidae): evidence of seasonal polydomy? Insectes Soc 44:75–83. doi:10.1007/s000400050031
Pontieri L, Vojvodic S, Graham R et al (2014) Ant colonies prefer infected over uninfected nest sites. PLoS One 9:e111961. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111961
Pratt SC (2005) Quorum sensing by encounter rates in the ant Temnothorax albipennis. Behav Ecol 16:488–496. doi:10.1093/beheco/ari020
Pratt SC (2010) Nest site choice in social insects. In: Breed MD, Moore J (eds) Encyclopedia Animal Behavior, vol 2. Amsterdam, Elsevier, pp 534–540
Pratt SC, Pierce NE (2001) The cavity-dwelling ant Leptothorax curvispinosus uses nest geometry to discriminate between potential homes. Anim Behav 62:281–287. doi:10.1006/anbe.2001.1777
Pratt SC, Sumpter DJT (2006) A tunable algorithm for collective decision-making. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:15906–15910. doi:10.1073/pnas.0604801103
Pratt SC, Mallon EB, Sumpter DJT, Franks NR (2002) Quorum sensing, recruitment, and collective decision-making during colony emigration by the ant Leptothorax albipennis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:117–127. doi:10.1007/s00265-002-0487-x
Pratt SC, Sumpter DJT, Mallon EB, Franks NR (2005) An agent-based model of collective nest choice by the ant Temnothorax albipennis. Anim Behav 70:1023–1036. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.01.022
Rettenmeyer CW, Topoff H, Mirenda J (1978) Queen retinues of army ants. Ann Entomol Soc Am 71:519–528. doi:10.1093/aesa/71.4.519
Roberts ER, Daniels S, Wardlaw JC et al (1999) Seasonal polydomy: its possible causes and its consequences for kinship and intra-specific parasitism in Leptothorax tuberum. Sociobiology 33:199–214
Robinson EJ (2014) Polydomy: the organisation and adaptive function of complex nest systems in ants. Curr Opin Insect Sci 5:37–43. doi:10.1016/j.cois.2014.09.002
Robinson EJH, Smith FD, Sullivan KME, Franks NR (2009) Do ants make direct comparisons? Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 276:2635–2641
Robinson EJH, Franks NR, Ellis S et al (2011) A simple threshold rule is sufficient to explain sophisticated collective decision-making. PLoS One 6:e19981. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019981
Rüppell O, Heinze J, Hölldobler B (2001) Alternative reproductive tactics in the queen-size-dimorphic ant Leptothorax rugatulus (Emery) and their consequences for genetic population structure. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:189–197. doi:10.1007/s002650100359
Sasaki T, Pratt SC (2013) Ants learn to rely on more informative attributes during decision-making. Biol Lett 9:20130667. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2013.0667
Sasaki T, Hölldobler B, Millar JG, Pratt SC (2014) A context-dependent alarm signal in the ant Temnothorax rugatulus. J Exp Biol 217:3229–3236. doi:10.1242/jeb.106849
Sasaki T, Colling B, Sonnenschein A et al (2015) Flexibility of collective decision making during house hunting in Temnothorax ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:707–714. doi:10.1007/s00265-015-1882-4
Seeley TD (2010) Honeybee democracy. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Seeley TD, Buhrman SC (2001) Nest-site selection in honey bees: how well do swarms implement the “best-of-N” decision rule? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:416–427. doi:10.1007/s002650000299
Seeley TD, Visscher PK (2003) Choosing a home: how the scouts in a honey bee swarm perceive the completion of their group decision making. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:511–520. doi:10.1007/s00265-003-0664-6
Stroeymeyt N, Jordan C, Mayer G et al (2014) Seasonality in communication and collective decision-making in ants. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 281:20133108. doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.3108
Stuart RJ (1985) Spontaneous polydomy in laboratory colonies of the ant, Leptothorax curvispinosus Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche J Entomol 92:71–82. doi:10.1155/1985/29215
Sumpter DJT, Pratt SC (2009) Quorum responses and consensus decision making. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 364:743–753. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0204
Visscher PK (2007) Group decision making in nest-site selection among social insects. Annu Rev Entomol 52:255–275. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151025
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the United States National Science Foundation (Award CCF-1012029).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Doering, G.N., Pratt, S.C. Queen location and nest site preference influence colony reunification by the ant Temnothorax rugatulus . Insect. Soc. 63, 585–591 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-016-0503-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-016-0503-1