Abstract
Objectives
Measuring of antenatal care utilisation is important from a public health perspective. The Content and Timing of care in Pregnancy tool (CTP) focuses on the care process and includes aspects on quality of care. The aim of the study is to gain insight in the applicability of the CTP tool across Europe.
Methods
National guidelines for routine antenatal care were examined, analysing the degree to which the four items in the CTP tool were included in these guidelines.
Results
From the 30 countries, 22 had a national guideline for routine antenatal care. The CTP tool is applicable in over 60% of the European countries with a national guideline.
Conclusions
The CTP tool can be used to measure antenatal care delivery in Europe. The tool is useful to evaluate the care process, focusing on rates of interventions as the closest approximation to the delivery of health care, with a focus on content of visits rather than simply the number of visits. Together with indicators measuring structure and outcome of health care, conclusions about the quality of care can be made.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander GR, Kotelchuck M (2001) Assessing the role and effectiveness of prenatal care: history, challenges, and directions for future research. Public Health Rep 116:306–316
Al-Qutob R, Mawajdeh S, Bin RF (1996) The assessment of reproductive health services: a conceptual framework for prenatal care. Health Care Women Int 17:423–434
American Academy of Pediatrics, the American College of Obstitricians and Gynecologists (2007) Antepartum Care. In: lockwood CJ, Lemons JA (eds) Guidelines for Perinatal Care, 6th edn Washington, pp 83–137
Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council. Clinical PracticeGuidelines (2015) Antenatal Care – Module II. Australian Government Department of Health.
Beeckman K, Louckx F, Masuy-Stroobant G, Downe S, Putman K (2011) The development and application of a new tool to assess the adequacy of the content and timing of antenatal care. BMC Health Serv Res 11:213
Beeckman K, Louckx F, Downe S, Putman K (2013a) The relationship between antenatal care and preterm birth: the importance of content of care. Eur J Public Health 23:366–371
Beeckman K, Louckx F, Putman K (2013b) Content and timing of antenatal care: predisposing, enabling and pregnancy-related determinants of antenatal care trajectories. Eur J Public Health 23:67–73
Bernloehr A (2007) Antenatal care in the European Union: Equal chances for all new citizens of the community. University of Surrey, Guildford
Bernloehr A, Smith P, Vydelingum V (2005) Antenatal care in the European Union: a survey on guidelines in all 25 member states of the Community. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 122:22–32
Braeken MA, Kemp A, Outhred T, Otte R, Monsieur G, Jones A, Van den Bergh BR (2013) Pregnant mothers with resolved anxiety disorders and their offspring have reduced heart rate variability: implications for the health of children. PLoS ONE 8,12: e83186
Catling CJ, Medley N, Foureur M, Ryan C, Leap N, Teate A, Homer CS (2015) Group versus conventional antenatal care for women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD007622
De Gauquier K, Remacle A (2007) Prenatale zorg in België in 2005, studie van het Intermutualistisch Agentschap, Intermutualistisch Agenschap, p 61. http://www.nic-ima.be/IMG/pdf/prenatale-zorg-in-2005---ima.pdf
Donabedian A (1997) The quality of care. How can it be assessed? 1988. Arch Pathol Lab Med 121:1145–1150
Donabedian A (2003) An introduction to quality assurance in health care. Oxford University Press, Oxford
EURO-PERISTAT project (2008) European Perinatal Health Report. Better statistics for better health for pregnant women and their babies. http://www.europeristat.com/images/doc/EPHR/european-perinatal-health-report.pdf
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Sultan S, Glasziou P, Akl EA, Alonso-Coello P, Atkins D, Kunz R, Brozek J, Montori V, Jaeschke R, Rind D, Dahm P, Meerpohl J, Vist G, Berliner E, Norris S, Falck-Ytter Y, Murad MH, Schunemann HJ (2011) GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 64:1311–1316
Gyselaers W, Jonckheer P, Ahmadzai N, Ansari MT, Carville S, Dworzynski K, Gaudet J, Jones K, Miller P, Terzlaff JM, Alexander S, Allegaert K, Beeckman K, Ceusens G, Christiane Y, de Ronne N, de Thysebaert B, Dekker N, Denys A, Eeckeleers P, Hernandez A, Mathieu E, Seuntjens L, Verleye L, Stordeur S (2015) What are the recommended clinical assessment and screening tests during pregnancy? Good Clinical Practice (GCP). Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE), KCE Reports 248. D/2015/10.273/58, Brussels
Handler A, RAnkin k, Rosenberg D, Sinha K (2012) Extent of documented adherence to recommended prenatal care content: provider site differences and effect on outcomes among low-income women. Matern Child Health J 16:393–405
Kogan MD, Martin JA, Alexander GR, Kotelchuck M, Ventura SJ, Frigoletto FD (1998) The changing pattern of prenatal care utilization in the United States, 1981–1995, using different prenatal care indices. JAMA 279:1623–1628
Korenbrot CC, Wong S, Steward A (2005) Health promotion and psychosocial services and women’s assessments of interpersonal prenatal care in Medicaid managed care. Matern Child Health J 9:135–149
Kotelchuck M (1994) An evaluation of the Kessner adequacy of prenatal care index and a proposed adequacy of prenatal care utilization index. Am J Public Health 84:1414–1420
Lodewyckx (2004) Nationale richtlijn prenatale zorg: een basis voor een klinisch pad voor de opvolging van zwangerschappen. KCE reports Vol. 6 A
Loomans EM, Van dijk E, Vrijkotte T, van Eijsden M, Stronks K, Gemke R, Van den Bergh BR (2013) Psychosocial stress during pregnancy is related to adverse birth outcomes: results from a large multi-ethnic community-based birth cohort. Eur J Public Health 23:485–491
Loomans EM, Van den Bergh BR, Schelling M, Vrijkotte T, van Eijsden M (2014) Maternal long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid status during early pregnancy and children’s risk of problem behavior at age 5–6 years. J Pediatr 164:762–768
McDuffie RS Jr, Beck A, Bischoff K, Cross J, Orleans M (1996) Effect of frequency of prenatal care visits on perinatal outcome among low-risk women. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 275:847–851
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2008). Antenatal care. Routine care for the healthy pregnant woman. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg62
Ng R, Macdonald E, Loutfy M, Yudin M, Raboud J, Masinde K, Bayoumi A, Tharao W, Brophy J, Glazier R, Antoniou T (2015) Adequacy of prenatal care among women living with human immunodeficiency virus: a population-based study. BMC Public Health 15:514
Nothnagle M, Marchi K, Egerter S, Braveman P (2000) Risk factors for late or no prenatal care following Medicaid expansions in California. Matern Child Health J 4:251–259
Odegard RA, Vatten LJ, Nilsen ST, Salvesen KA, Austgulen R (2000) Risk factors and clinical manifestations of pre-eclampsia. BJOG 107:1410–1416
Otte RA, Donkers F, Braeken M, Van den Bergh B (2015) Multimodal processing of emotional information in 9-month-old infants II: prenatal exposure to maternal anxiety. Brain Cogn 95:107–117
Partridge S, Balayla J, Holcroft C, Abehaim H (2012) Inadequate prenatal care utilization and risks of infant mortality and poor birth outcome: a retrospective analysis of 28,729,765 U.S. deliveries over 8 years. Am J Perinatol 29:787–793
Petrou S, Kupek E, Vause S, Maresh M (2001) Clinical, provider and sociodemographic determinants of the number of antenatal visits in England and Wales. Soc Sci Med 52:1123–1134
Raatikainen K, Heiskanen N, Heinonen S (2007) Under-attending free antenatal care is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. BMC Public Health 7:268
Reveiz L, Gyte GML, Uervo LG (2007) Treatments for iron-deficiency anaemia in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD003094
Ricketts SA, Murray E, Schwalberg R (2005) Reducing low birthweight by resolving risks: results from Colorado’s prenatal plus program. Am J Public Health 95:1952–1957
Sibai BM, Gordon T, Thom E, Caritis SN, Klebanoff M, McNellis D, Paul RH (1995) Risk factors for preeclampsia in healthy nulliparous women: a prospective multicenter study. The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. Am J Obstet Gynecol 172:642–648
Stamilio DM, Sehdev HM, Morgan MA, Propert K, Macones GA (2000) Can antenatal clinical and biochemical markers predict the development of severe preeclampsia? Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:589–594
Tayebi T, Zahrani S, Mohammadpour R (2013) Relationship between adequacy of prenatal care utilization index and pregnancy outcomes. Iran J Nurs. Midwifery 18:360–366
Taylor CR, Alexander GR, Hepworth JT (2005) Clustering of U.S. women receiving no prenatal care: differences in pregnancy outcomes and implications for targeting interventions. Matern Child Health J 9:125–133
Vanderweele TJ, lantos J, Siddigue J, Lauderdale D (2008) A comparison of four prenatal care indices in birth outcome models: Comparable results for predicting small-for-gestational-age outcome but different results for preterm birth or infant mortality. J Clin Epidemiol 62:438–445
White DE, Fraser-Lee N, Tough S, Newburn-Cook CV (2006) The content of prenatal care and its relationship to preterm birth in Alberta, Canada. Health Care Women Int 27:777–792
Acknowledgements
This paper is part of the COST Action IS0907, ‘Childbirth Cultures, Concerns and Consequences: Creating a dynamic EU framework for optimal maternity care’. The Action aimed to advance scientific knowledge about ways of providing optimum maternity care provision and outcomes for mothers, babies and families across Europe (see http://www.cost.eu/COST_Actions/isch/Actions/IS0907.) Furthermore we want to thank EURO-PERISTAT, the European Midwives Organisation (EMA) and the European Board and College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (EBCOG) for their willingness to participate in our study and spread the questionnaire to their members. Finally, we want to thank the respondents and data validators to take time to fill out the questionnaire.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest to declare.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beeckman, K., Frith, L., Gottfreðsdóttir, H. et al. Measuring antenatal care use in Europe: is the content and timing of care in pregnancy tool applicable?. Int J Public Health 62, 583–590 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-017-0959-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-017-0959-4