Skip to main content
Log in

Reactions to smoke-free public policies and smoke-free home policies in the Republic of Georgia: results from a 2014 national survey

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives

We examined receptivity to public smoke-free policies and smoke-free home status among adults in the Republic of Georgia.

Methods

In Spring 2014, we conducted a national household survey of 1163 adults.

Results

Our sample was on average 42.4 years old, 51.1 % male, and 43.2 % urban. Current smoking prevalence was 54.2 % in men and 6.5 % in women. Notably, 42.2 % reported daily secondhand smoke exposure (SHSe). Past week SHSe was 29.9 % in indoor public places and 33.0 % in outdoor public places. The majority reported no opposition to public smoke-free policies. Correlates of greater receptivity to public policies included being older, female, and a nonsmoker. Past week SHSe in homes was 54.2 %; 38.8 % reported daily SHSe at home. Only 14.3 % reported complete smoke-free home policies; 39.0 % had partial policies. The only correlate of allowing smoking in the home was being a smoker. Among smokers, correlates of allowing smoking in the home were being male and lower confidence in quitting.

Conclusions

SHSe is prevalent in various settings in Georgia, requiring efforts to promote support for public smoke-free policies and implementation of personal policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Lung Association (2014) State of Tobacco Control, 2014. American Lung Association, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashley MJ, Ferrence R (1998) Reducing children’s exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in homes: issues and strategies. Tob Control 7(1):61–65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhturidze G, Magradze G, Mirotadze D, Andguladze D (2008) Population survey on tobacco economy and policy in Georgia. FCTC Implementation and Monitoring Center in Georgia Department of Statistics, Tbilisi

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg CJ, Cox LS, Nazir N, Mussulman LM, Ahluwalia JS, Ellerbeck EF (2006) Correlates of home smoking restrictions among rural smokers. Nicotine Tob Res 8(3):353–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berg CJ, Solomon M, Barkley A, Bailey E, Goodwin S, Kegler MC (2015a) Tobacco taxes in the southeastern U.S. states: views from former legislators. Health Behav Policy Rev 2(5):333–342

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Berg CJ, Stratton E, Schauer GL, Lewis M, Wang Y, Windle M, Kegler MC (2015b) Perceived harm, addictiveness, and social acceptability of tobacco products and marijuana among young adults: marijuana, hookah, and electronic cigarettes win. Subst Use Misuse 50(1):79–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berg CJ, Aslanikashvili A, Djibuti M (2015c) A cross-sectional study examining adult smoking rates and recent quit attempts in the republic of Georgia. Tob Control Public Health East Eur 5(1):21–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg CJ, Solomon M, Bailey E, Barkley A, Goodwin S, Bascombe T, Kegler MC (in press) Former southeastern state legislators views on public smoke-free policies. Health Behav Policy Rev

  • Biener L, Abrams DB (1991) The contemplation ladder: validation of a measure of readiness to consider smoking cessation. Health Psychol 10(5):360–365

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borland R, Yong HH, Cummings KM, Hyland A, Anderson S, Fong GT (2006) Determinants and consequences of smoke-free homes: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control 15(Suppl 3): iii42–50

  • Cartmell KB, Miner C, Carpenter MJ, Vitoc CS, Biggers S, Onicescu G, Hill EG, Nickerson BC, Alberg AJ (2011) Secondhand smoke exposure in young people and parental rules against smoking at home and in the car. Public Health Rep 126(4):575–582

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012) The guide to community preventive services. http://www.thecommunityguide.org/index.html

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013) Behavioral risk factor surveillance system prevalence and trends data, 2013. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, Atlanta

  • Clark PI, Schooley MW, Pierce B, Schulman J, Hartman AM, Schmitt CL (2006) Impact of home smoking rules on smoking patterns among adolescents and young adults. Prev Chronic Dis 3(2):A41

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman E, Bayer R (2004) Unfiltered: conflicts over tobacco policy and public health. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn BS, Dana GS, Goldstein AO, Bauman KE, Cohen JE, Gottlieb NH, Solomon LJ, Munger MC (1997) State legislators’ intentions to vote and subsequent votes on tobacco control legislation. Health Psychol 16(4):401–404

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn BS, Goldstein AO, Solomon LJ, Bauman KE, Gottlieb NH, Cohen JE, Munger MC, Dana GS (1998) Predictors of state legislators’ intentions to vote for cigarette tax increases. Prev Med 27(2):157–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn EJ, Toumey CP, Rayens MK, McCoy CA (1999) Kentucky legislators’ views on tobacco policy. Am J Prev Med 16(2):81–88

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hyland A, Higbee C, Borland R, Travers M, Hastings G, Fong GT, Cummings KM (2009a) Attitudes and beliefs about secondhand smoke and smoke-free policies in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey. Nicotine Tob Res 11(6):642–649

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hyland A, Higbee C, Travers MJ, Van Deusen A, Bansal-Travers M, King B, Cummings KM (2009b) Smoke-free homes and smoking cessation and relapse in a longitudinal population of adults. Nicotine Tob Res 11(6):614–618

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • International Agency for Research on Cancer (2009) Evaluating the effectiveness of smoke-free policies, chapter 4: impact of smoke-free policies on businesses, the hospitality sector, and other incidental outcomes. IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention, Lyon

  • Loomis BR, Shafer PR, van Hasselt M (2013) The economic impact of smoke-free laws on restaurants and bars in 9 States. Prev Chronic Dis 10:E128

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJ (2006) Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet 367(9524):1747–1757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ng M, Freeman MK, Fleming TD, Robinson M, Dwyer-Lindgren L, Thomson B, Wollum A, Sanman E, Wulf S, Lopez AD, Murray CJ, Gakidou E (2014) Smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption in 187 countries, 1980–2012. JAMA 311(2):183–192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oberg M, Jaakkola MS, Woodward A, Peruga A, Pruss-Ustun A (2011) Worldwide burden of disease from exposure to second-hand smoke: a retrospective analysis of data from 192 countries. Lancet 377(9760):139–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pizacani BA, Martin DP, Stark MJ, Koepsell TD, Thompson B, Diehr P (2008) Longitudinal study of household smoking ban adoption among households with at least one smoker: associated factors, barriers, and smoker support. Nicotine Tob Res 10(3):533–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts B, Gilmore A, Stickley A, Rotman D, Prohoda V, Haerpfer C, McKee M (2012) Changes in smoking prevalence in 8 countries of the former Soviet Union between 2001 and 2010. Am J Public Health 102(7):1320–1328

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt AM, Ranney LM, Goldstein AO (2014) Communicating program outcomes to encourage policymaker support for evidence-based state tobacco control. Int J Environ Res Public Health 11(12):12562–12574

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Songer D, Dillon S, Kite D (1986) The influence of issues on choice of voting cues utilized by state legislators. West Polit Q 39:118–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrasher JF, Perez-Hernandez R, Swayampakala K, Arillo-Santillan E, Bottai M (2010a) Policy support, norms, and secondhand smoke exposure before and after implementation of a comprehensive smoke-free law in Mexico city. Am J Public Health 100(9):1789–1798

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Thrasher JF, Swayampakala K, Arillo-Santillan E, Sebrie E, Walsemann KM, Bottai M (2010b) Differential impact of local and federal smoke-free legislation in Mexico: a longitudinal study among adult smokers. Salud Publica Mex 52(Suppl 2):S244–S253

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Thrasher JF, Kim S, Rose I, Craft MK, Biggers S (2015) Media coverage of smoke-free policies after their innovation. J Health Commun 20(3):297–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2008) WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2008. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2011) WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2011. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2012) Georgia STEPS report. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2014) STEPwise approach to surveillance (STEPS). http://www.who.int/chp/steps/en/

  • World Health Organization (2015) Global Adult Tobacco Survey. http://www.who.int/tobacco/surveillance/gats/en/

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Cancer Institute (K07 CA139114; PI: Berg), the Georgia Cancer Coalition (PI: Berg), and the Council for International Exchange of Scholars Fulbright Scholars Program. We would like to thank the Georgia National Center for Disease Control and Public Health for their scientific input and technical support in conducting this research and Tbilisi State Medical University for hosting Dr. Berg during her tenure as a Fulbright Scholar in Georgia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carla J. Berg.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Berg, C.J., Topuridze, M., Maglakelidze, N. et al. Reactions to smoke-free public policies and smoke-free home policies in the Republic of Georgia: results from a 2014 national survey. Int J Public Health 61, 409–416 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-016-0793-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-016-0793-0

Keywords

Navigation