Abstract
Aquatic plants mostly disperse via vegetative means, and plant fragments are the most important vegetative dispersal units. Here we studied the fragment drift in the medium sized River Erft, in which the macrophyte community is dominated by alien aquatic plants. The plant fragments were sampled at six different sites in the drift of the river. We analyzed the drifting biomass, the number of fragments and the number of propagation units (based on the known minimum size of fragments needed for regeneration of each species) as potential propagation units. Overall, we sampled >13,000 drift units of various sizes, from short stem fragments <1 cm up to the largest containing >400 connected plants (Vallisneria spiralis), resulting in >500,000 propagation units. The total number of sampled drift units and propagation units were significantly higher for native than for alien plant species. The number of sampled drift units and biomass was correlated with the total plant mass (TPM, calculated from species abundances per river section and section lengths) of the species in the river. However, the highest numbers of drift and propagation units per unit TPM were found for the four natives Ceratophyllum demersum, Potamogeton pectinatus, Potamogeton crispus and Myriophyllum spicatum, contributing to more than 75 % of the total number of fragments sampled. Conversely, lowest numbers of drift units were found for alien plants Hygrophila polysperma and Hydrocotyle ranunculoides, and no drift units were collected for four aquatic plant species in the river (alien Myriophyllum aquaticum and natives Nuphar lutea, Potamogeton nodosus and Sparganium emersum).
References
Aiken SG, Newroth PR, Wile I (1979) The biology of Canadian weeds: 34. Myriophyllum spicatum. Can J Plant Sci 59:201–215
Barnes MA, Jerde CL, Keller D, Chadderton WL, Howeth JG, Lodge DM (2013) Viability of aquatic plant fragments following desiccation. Invasive Plant Sci Manage 6:320–325
Barrat-Segretain MH, Bornette G (2000) Regeneration and colonization abilities of aquatic plant fragments: effect of disturbance seasonality. Hydrobiologia 421:31–39
Barrat-Segretain MH, Bornette G, Hering-Vilas-Boas A (1998) Comparative abilities of vegetative regeneration among aquatic plants growing in disturbed habitats. Aquat Bot 60:201–211
Bickel TO (2015) A boat hitchhiker’s guide to survival: Cabomba caroliniana desiccation resistance and survival ability. Hydrobiologia 746:123–134
Boedeltje G, Bakker JP, Bekker RM, Van Groenendael JM, Soesbergen M (2003) Plant dispersal in a lowland stream in relation to occurrence and three specific life-history traits of the species in the species pool. J Ecol 91:855–866
Boedeltje G, Bakker JP, Ten Brinke A, Van Groenendael JM, Soesbergen M (2004) Dispersal phenology of hydrochorous plants in relation to discharge, seed release time and buoyancy of seeds: the flood pulse concept supported. J Ecol 92:786–796
Brochet AL, Guillemain M, Fritz H, Gauthier-Clerc M, Green AJ (2010) Plant dispersal by teal (Anas crecca) in the Camargue: duck guts are more important than their feet. Freshwater Biol 55:1262–1273
Bruckerhoff L, Havel J, Knight S (2015) Survival of invasive aquatic plants after air exposure and implications for dispersal by recreational boats. Hydrobiologia 746:113–121
Brunel S (2009) Pathway analysis: aquatic plants imported in 10 EPPO countries. EPPO Bull 39:201–213
Catling PM, Dobson I (1985) The biology of Canadian weeds: 69. Potamogeton crispus. Can J Plant Sci 65:655–668
Chadwell TB, Engelhardt KAM (2008) Effects of pre-existing submersed vegetation and propagule pressure on the invasion success of Hydrilla verticillata. J Appl Ecol 45:515–523
Champion PD, Clayton JS, Hofstra DE (2010) Nipping aquatic plant invasions in the bud: weed risk assessment and the trade. Hydrobiologia 656:167–172
Cook CDK, Urmi-König K (1985) A revision of the genus Elodea (Hydrocharitaceae). Aquat Bot 21:111–156
Fritschler N, Hussner A, Busch J (2008) Regenerationsfähigkeit von indigenen und neophytischen Wasserpflanzen. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Limnologie (DGL)-Tagungsbericht 2007:199–203
Garcia-Alvarez A, Van Leeuwen CHA, Luque CJ, Hussner A, Velez-Martin A, Perez-Vasquez A, Green AJ, Castellanos EM (2015) Internal transport of alien Ludwigia and Spartina seeds by geese and ducks. Freshwater Biol 60:1316–1329
Haag RW, Gorham PR (1977) Effects of thermal effluent on standing crop and net production of Elodea canadensis and other submerged macrophytes in Lake Wabamun, Alberta. J Appl Ecol 14:835–851
Holm L, Doll J, Holm E, Pancho J, Herberger J (1997) World Weeds: Natural Histories and Distribution, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Hussner A (2009) Growth and photosynthesis of four invasive aquatic plant species in Europe. Weed Res 49:506–515
Hussner A (2014) Long-term macrophyte mapping documents a continuously shift from native to non-native aquatic plant dominance in the thermally abnormal River Erft (North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany). Limnologica 48:39–45
Hussner A, Lösch R (2005) Alien aquatic plants in a thermally abnormal river and their assembly to neophyte-dominated macrophyte stands (River Erft, Northrhine-Westphalia). Limnologica 35:18–30
Hussner A, van Dam H, Vermaat JE, Hilt S (2014a) Comparison of native and neophytic aquatic macrophyte developments in a geothermally warmed river and thermally normal channels. Fund Appl Limnol 185:155–166
Hussner A, Heidbuechel P, Heiligtag S (2014b) Vegetative overwintering and reproduction by seeds explains the establishment of invasive Pistia stratiotes within the River Erft system (North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany). Aquat Bot 119:28–32
Hussner A, Hofstra D, Jahns P, Clayton J (2015) Response capacity to CO2 depletion rather than temperature and light effects explain the growth success of three alien Hydrocharitaceae compared with native Myriophyllum triphyllum in New Zealand. Aquat Bot 120:205–211
Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2001) Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol Evol 16:199–204
Kuntz K, Heidbüchel P, Hussner A (2014) Effects of water nutrients on regeneration capacity of submerged aquatic plant fragments. Ann Limnol Int J Lim 50:155–162
Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn T (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 20:223–228
Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn TM (2009) The more you introduce the more you get: the role of colonization pressure and propagule pressure in invasion ecology. Divers Distrib 15:904–910
Madsen JD, Smith DH (1997) Vegetative spread of Eurasian watermilfoil colonies. J Aquat Plant Manage 35:63–68
Maki M, Galatowitsch S (2004) Movement of invasive aquatic plants into Minnesota (USA) through horticultural trade. Biol Conserv 118:389–396
Okada M, Grewell BJ, Jasienuk M (2009) Clonal spread of invasive Ludwigia hexapetala and L. grandiflora in freshwater wetlands in California. Aquat Bot 91:123–129
Orchard AE (1981) A revision of South American Myriophyllum (Haloragaceae) and its repercussions on some Australian and North American species. Brunonia 4:27–65
Ricciardi A, Kipp R (2008) Predicting the number of ecologically harmful exotic species in an aquatic system. Divers Distrib 14:374–380
Riede W (1920) Untersuchungen über Wasserpflanzen. Flora 114:1–118
Riis T, Sand-Jensen K (2006) Dispersal of plants in small streams. Freshwater Biol 51:274–286
Riis T, Madsen TV, Sennels RSH (2009) Regeneration, colonisation and growth rates of allofragments in four common stream plants. Aquat Bot 90:209–212
Ruaux B, Greulich S, Haury J, Berton JP (2009) Sexual reproduction of two alien invasive Ludwigia (Onagraceae) on the middle Loire River, France. Aquat Bot 90:143–148
Sculthorpe CD (1967) The biology of aquatic vascular plants. Arnold, London
Simberloff D (2009) The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:81–102
Spencer W, Bowes G (1985) Limnophila and Hygrophila: a review and physiological assessment of their weed potential and Florida. J Aquat Plant Manage 23:7–16
Thiebaut G, Martinez L (2015) An exotic macrophyte bed may facilitate the anchorage of exotic propagules during the first stage of invasion. Hydrobiologia 746:183–196
Umetsu CA, Evangelista HBA, Thomaz SM (2012) The colonization, regeneration, and growth rates of macrophytes from fragments: a comparison between exotic and native submerged aquatic species. Aquat Ecol 46:443–449
Vari A (2010) Colonisation by fragments in six common aquatic macrophyte species. Fund Appl Limnol 183:15–26
Acknowledgments
We heartily acknowledge the helpful comments and the language check by Dr D. Hofstra, NIWA, Hamilton, NZ. We thank Dr. U. Rose (Erftverband) for the permission to work at the River Erft and J. Peters (Landesamt für Natur, Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz, LANUV NRW) for provision of discharge data. We acknowledge the helpful comments of Prof. Dr. J.D. Ackermann and one anonymous reviewer to the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heidbüchel, P., Kuntz, K. & Hussner, A. Alien aquatic plants do not have higher fragmentation rates than native species: a field study from the River Erft. Aquat Sci 78, 767–777 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-016-0468-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-016-0468-1