Skip to main content
Log in

Simple large wood structures promote hydromorphological heterogeneity and benthic macroinvertebrate diversity in low-gradient rivers

Aquatic Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The presence of large wood (LW) in river channels adds an important habitat feature for benthic macroinvertebrates. However, there has been a lack of studies focusing on the effects of simple wood structures on hydromorphology and macroinvertebrate diversity in surrounding channel areas. This study explores whether consistent patterns in LW-related benthic habitat complexity and macroinvertebrate diversity can be identified across a set of low-gradient streams dominated by fine sediments. While the presence of LW did not change the average values of standard hydromorphological variables (flow velocity, turbulence, median sediment grain size and sorting index), the coefficients of variation of such variables for wood rich sites were consistently higher than those for wood poor sites (velocity: 85 % higher, turbulence: 89 %, grain size: 126 %, sorting index: 67 % higher). In parallel, beta diversity was on average 31 % higher in the wood rich sites, and positively correlated with the amount of LW at the site. The hotspots of local (alpha) diversity were located in the river-bed areas surrounding the LW, where taxonomic richness was 83 % higher and Shannon–Wiener diversity 39 % higher compared to the sites with less wood. These results demonstrate that the presence of LW in sandy lowland rivers induces consistent patterns of increased spatial variability of benthic habitats in the surrounding channel areas and this significantly enhances alpha and beta diversity of macroinvertebrate communities. Therefore, LW should be conserved in river channels wherever possible, and its potential for introduction into degraded systems should be explored further because even simple pieces of LW introduced to lowland streams can deliver benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  • Acuña V, Díez JR, Flores L, Meleason M, Elosegi A (2013) Does it make economic sense to restore rivers for their ecosystem services? J Appl Ecol 50:988–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol 26:32–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ (2006) Distance-based tests for homogeneity of multivariate dispersions. Biometrics 62:245–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ, Millar RB (2004) Spatial variation and effects of habitat on temperate reef fish assemblages in northeastern New Zealand. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 305:191–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aqem Consortium (2008) ASTERICS: AQEM. STAR ecological river classification system, version 31

  • Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B (2012) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4

  • Beisel J-N, Usseglio-Polatera P, Moreteau J-C (2000) The spatial heterogeneity of a river bottom: a key factor determining macroinvertebrate communities. Hydrobiologia 422(433):163–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benke A, Wallace JB (2003) Influence of wood on invertebrate communities in streams and rivers. In: Gregory SV, Boyer KL, Gurnell AM (eds) The ecology and management of wood in world rivers. American Fisheries Society, Symposium, vol 37, Bethesda, MD, pp 149–177

  • Bremigan MT et al (2008) Hydrogeomorphic features mediate the effects of land use/cover on reservoir productivity and food webs. Limnol Oceanogr 53:1420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks SS, Palmer MA, Cardinale BJ, Swan CM, Ribblett S (2002) Assessing stream ecosystem rehabilitation: limitations of community structure data. Restor Ecol 10:156–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosse S, Arbuckle CJ, Townsend CR (2003) Habitat scale and biodiversity: influence of catchment, stream reach and bedform scales on local invertebrate diversity. Biodivers Conserv 12:2057–2075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown BL (2003) Spatial heterogeneity reduces temporal variability in stream insect communities. Ecol Lett 6:316–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunke M, Hoffmann A, Pusch M (2002) Association between invertebrate assemblages and mesohabitats in a lowland river (Spree, Germany): a chance for predictions? Archiv Hydrobiol 154:239–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buffin-Bélanger T, Roy AG (2005) 1 min in the life of a river: selecting the optimal record length for the measurement of turbulence in fluvial boundary layers. Geomorphology 68:77–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buffington JM, Montgomery DR (1999) Effects of hydraulic roughness on surface textures of gravel-bed rivers. Water Resour Res 35:3507–3521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cáceres MD, Legendre P (2009) Associations between species and groups of sites: indices and statistical inference. Ecology 90:3566–3574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinale BJ, Palmer MA, Swan CM, Brooks S, Poff NL (2002) The influence of substrate heterogeneity on biofilm metabolism in a stream ecosystem. Ecology 83:412–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke KR, Warwick RM (2001) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd edn. PRIMER-E Ltd, Plymouth

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe HJ, Kiffney PM, Pess GR, Kloehn KK, McHenry ML (2009) Periphyton and invertebrate response to wood placement in large pacific coastal rivers. River Res Appl 25:1025–1035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels MD (2006) Distribution and dynamics of large woody debris and organic matter in a low-energy meandering stream. Geomorphology 77:286–298. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.01.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donohue I, Jackson AL, Pusch MT, Irvine K (2009) Nutrient enrichment homogenizes lake benthic assemblages at local and regional scales. Ecology 90:3470–3477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Enders EC, Boisclair D, Roy AG (2003) The effect of turbulence on the cost of swimming for juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 60:1149–1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feld CK, Hering D (2007) Community structure or function: effects of environmental stress on benthic macroinvertebrates at different spatial scales. Freshw Biol 52:1380–1399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frissell CA, Liss WJ, Warren CE, Hurley MD (1986) A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: viewing streams in a watershed context. Environ Manag 10:199–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhard M, Reich M (2000) Restoration of streams with large wood: effects of accumulated and built-in wood on channel morphology, habitat diversity and aquatic fauna. Int Rev Hydrobiol 85:123–137. doi:10.1002/(sici)1522-2632(200003)85:1<123::aid-iroh123>3.0.co;2-t

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gippel CJ, O’Neill IC, Finlayson BL, Schnatz I (1996) Hydraulic guidelines for the re-introduction and management of large woody debris in lowland rivers. Regul Rivers Res Manag 12:223–236. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199603)12:2/3<223::AID-RRR391>3.0.CO;2-#

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gostner W, Alp M, Schleiss AJ, Robinson CT (2013) The hydro-morphological index of diversity: a tool for describing habitat heterogeneity in river engineering projects. Hydrobiologia 712:43–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graeber D, Pusch MT, Lorenz S, Brauns M (2013) Cascading effects of flow reduction on the benthic invertebrate community in a lowland river. Hydrobiologia 717:147–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gurnell AM, Linstead C (1998) Interactions between large woody debris accumulations, hydrological processes and channel morphology in British headwater rivers. In: Wheater H, Kirby C (eds) Hydrology in a changing environment, vol 1. Wiley, Chichester, pp 381–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Heppell C, Wharton G, Cotton J, Bass J, Roberts S (2009) Sediment storage in the shallow hyporheic of lowland vegetated river reaches. Hydrol Process 23:2239–2251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilderbrand RH, Lemly AD, Dolloff CA, Harpster KL (1997) Effects of large woody debris placement on stream channels and benthic macroinvertebrates. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:931–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann A, Hering D (2000) Wood-associated macroinvertebrate fauna in central European streams. Int Rev Hydrobiol 85:25–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson GE (1961) The paradox of the plankton. Am Nat 95:137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jowett I (2003) Hydraulic constraints on habitat suitability for benthic invertebrates in gravel-bed rivers. River Res Appl 19:495–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kail J, Hering D, Muhar S, Gerhard M, Preis S (2007) The use of large wood in stream restoration: experiences from 50 projects in Germany and Austria. J Appl Ecol 44:1145–1155. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01401.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laasonen P, Muotka T, Kivijärvi I (1998) Recovery of macroinvertebrate communities from stream habitat restoration. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 8:101–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepori F, Palm D, Brännäs E, Malmqvist B (2005) Does restoration of structural heterogeneity in streams enhance fish and macroinvertebrate diversity? Ecol Appl 15:2060–2071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liébault F, Piégay H (2001) Assessment of channel changes due to long-term bedload supply decrease, Roubion River, France. Geomorphology 36:167–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M, Mouquet N, Gonzalez A (2003) Biodiversity as spatial insurance in heterogeneous landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:12765–12770

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Miller SW, Budy P, Schmidt JC (2010) Quantifying macroinvertebrate responses to in-stream habitat restoration: applications of meta-analysis to river restoration. Restor Ecol 18:8–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minshall G, Robinson C (1998) Macroinvertebrate community structure in relation to measures of lotic habitat heterogeneity. Archiv Hydrobiol 141:129–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DR, Collins BD, Buffington JM, Abbe TB (2003) Geomorphic effects of wood in rivers. Am Fish Soc Symp 37:21–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Muotka T, Laasonen P (2002) Ecosystem recovery in restored headwater streams: the role of enhanced leaf retention. J Appl Ecol 39:145–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutz M (2000) Influences of woody debris on flow patterns and channel morphology in a low energy, sand-bed stream reach. Int Rev Hydrobiol 85:107–121. doi:10.1002/(sici)1522-2632(200003)85:1<107::aid-iroh107>3.0.co;2-l

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor N (1991) The effects of habitat complexity on the macroinvertebrates colonising wood substrates in a lowland stream. Oecologia 85:504–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J et al (2013) vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.0-7. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan

  • Olden JD, Poff NL, Bestgen KR (2006) Life-history strategies predict fish invasions and extirpations in the Colorado River Basin. Ecol Monogr 76:25–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passy SI, Blanchet FG (2007) Algal communities in human-impacted stream ecosystems suffer beta-diversity decline. Divers Distrib 13:670–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piégay H, Landon N (1997) Promoting ecological management of riparian forests on the Drôme River, France. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 7:287–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilotto F, Bertoncin A, Harvey GL, Wharton G, Pusch MT (2014) Diversification of stream invertebrate communities by large wood. Freshw Biol 59:2571–2583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pretty J, Harrison S, Shepherd D, Smith C, Hildrew A, Hey R (2003) River rehabilitation and fish populations: assessing the benefit of instream structures. J Appl Ecol 40:251–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosario-Martinez H (2013) phia: post hoc interaction analysis. R package version 0.1–3

  • Smock LA, Metzler GM, Gladden JE (1989) Role of debris dams in the structure and functioning of low-gradient headwater streams. Ecology 70:764–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stier AC, Geange SW, Hanson KM, Bolker BM (2013) Predator density and timing of arrival affect reef fish community assembly. Ecology 94:1057–1068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/

  • Townsend CR, Hildrew AG (1994) Species traits in relation to a habitat templet for river systems. Freshw Biol 31:265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend CR, Dolédec S, Norris R, Peacock K, Arbuckle C (2003) The influence of scale and geography on relationships between stream community composition and landscape variables: description and prediction. Freshw Biol 48:768–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaz PG, Dias S, Pinto P, Merten EC, Robinson CT, Warren DR, Rego FC (2014) Effects of burn status and conditioning on colonization of wood by stream macroinvertebrates. Freshw Sci 33:832–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace JB, Webster JR, Meyer JL (1995) Influence of log additions on physical and biotic characteristics of a mountain stream. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 52:2120–2137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanner SC, Pusch M (2001) Analysis of particulate organic matter retention by benthic structural elements in a lowland river (River Spree, Germany). Archiv Hydrobiol 151:475–492

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RH (1972) Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21:213–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohl E (2013) Floodplains and wood. Earth Sci Rev 123:194–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been carried out within the SMART Joint Doctorate Programme ‘Science for the MAnagement of Rivers and their Tidal systems’ funded by the Erasmus Mundus programme of the European Union. The authors thank Jürgen Schreiber, Marlen Mährlein and Magdalena Czarnecka for field and lab assistance, and Drawienski National Park for allowing field work in the Płociczna and Korytnica Rivers, and for helpful support of field work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Pilotto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pilotto, F., Harvey, G.L., Wharton, G. et al. Simple large wood structures promote hydromorphological heterogeneity and benthic macroinvertebrate diversity in low-gradient rivers. Aquat Sci 78, 755–766 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-016-0467-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-016-0467-2

Keywords

Navigation