Skip to main content
Log in

Start at zero: succession of benthic invertebrate assemblages in restored former sewage channels

Aquatic Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We analysed the development of benthic invertebrate assemblages in restored urban streams in Germany. Prior to restoration these streams were open sewers and not inhabited by benthic invertebrates except Oligochaeta. Therefore, almost all taxa recolonised the streams after restoration. Restoration included the improvement of the water quality and the hydro-morphology. Following stream restoration, benthic invertebrate assemblages are supposed to undergo a distinct succession, as new habitats have been generated. These processes are poorly understood in streams. Our study revealed succession patterns and processes of benthic invertebrate assemblages in restored streams formerly transporting sewage, with pioneer taxa being dominant in the first years and a gradual assemblage maturation. We sampled 13 sites in seven restored streams in the springs of 2012 and 2013. Seven of these sites are connected to near-natural sections, whereas six sites lack this connection. The 13 sites differ in time since restoration and were sampled between one and 20 years after restoration. Additionally, we sampled 21 near-natural sites within the catchment and 11 near-natural sites in neighbouring catchments as potential recolonisation sources. Within 1 year, the restored sites underwent succession, which led to a higher resemblance of their assemblages to those of source sites. Derived from change values and non-metric multidimensional scaling, assemblages of young restored sites changed more than assemblages of old ones. In the first years after restoration we found assemblages with high abundances of pioneer taxa, while 5 years after restoration assemblages were increasingly similar to those of the source sites and mature assemblages were observed a decade after restoration. The succession towards near-natural assemblages is influenced by the instream habitats, catchment conditions and the recolonisation sources in the surroundings. Our findings reveal that monitoring results obtained fewer than 10 years after restoration will still be influenced by ongoing succession.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ADV (Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Vermessungsverwaltungen der Länder der Bundesrepublik Deutschland) (2008) ATKIS-Objektartenkatalog Basis-DLM. NRW-Erfassung. Dokumentation zur Modellierung der Geoinformationen des amtlichen Vermessungswesens. ATKIS-Katalogwerke. Version 6.0. State: 11.04.2008

  • Beisel JN, Usseglio-Polatera P, Moreteau JC (2000) The spatial heterogeneity of a river bottom: a key factor determining macroinvertebrate communities. Hydrobiologia 422(423):163–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc 57:289–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Blann K, Anderson JL, Sands G, Vondracek B (2009) Effects of agricultural drainage on aquatic ecosystems: a Review. Rev Environ Sci Technol 39:909–1001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boix D, Biggs J, Céréghino R, Hull AP, Kalettka T, Oertli B (2012) Pond research and management in Europe: “Small is Beautiful”. Hydrobiologia 689:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulton AJ, Findlay S, Marmonier P, Stanley EH, Valett HM (1998) The functional significance of the hyporheic zone in streams and rivers. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:59–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briers RA, Cariss HM, Gee JHR (2003) Flight activity of adult stoneflies in relation to weather. Ecol Entomol 28:31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cañedo-Argüelles M, Rieradevall M (2011) Early succession of the macroinvertebrate community in a shallow lake: response to changes in the habitat condition. Limnologica 41:363–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199:1302–1310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cushing C, Gains W (1989) Thoughts on recolonization of endorheic cold desert spring-streams. J N Am Benthol Soc 8:277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Death RG, Collier KJ (2010) Measuring stream macroinvertebrate responses to gradients of vegetation cover: when is enough enough? Freshw Biol 55:1447–1464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EGLV (Emschergenossenschaft/Lippeverband) (2014) Generationenprojekt für eine Region mit Zukunft. Available at: http://www.eglv.de/wasserportal/emscher-umbau.html. Accessed 27 Feb 2014

  • Haase P, Lohse S, Pauls S, Schindehütte K, Sundermann A, Rolauffs P, Hering D (2004) Assessing streams in Germany with benthic invertebrates: development of a practical standardised protocol for macroinvertebrate sampling and sorting. Limnologica 34:349–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haase P, Murray-Bligh J, Lohse S, Pauls SU, Sundermann A, Gunn R, Clarke R (2006) Assessing the impact of errors in sorting and identifying macroinvertebrate samples. Hydrobiologia 566:505–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haase P, Sundermann A, Schindehütte K (2011) Operationelle Taxaliste als Mindestanforderung an die Bestimmung von Makrozoobenthosproben aus Fließgewässern zur Umsetzung der EU-Wasserrahmenrichtlinie in Deutschland. Available at: http://www.fliessgewaesserbewertung.de/downloads/Operationelle_Taxaliste_Mai2011.zip. Accessed 12 Dec 2013

  • Huang S, Guo Q (2014) Research review on effects of urban landscape pattern changes on water environment. Acta Ecol Sin 34:3142–3150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes JM (2007) Constraints on recovery: using molecular methods to study connectivity of aquatic biota in rivers and streams. Freshw Biol 52:616–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes SJ, Ferreira T, Cortes RV (2008) Hierarchical spatial patterns and drivers of change in bentic macroinvertebrate communities in an intermittent Mediterranean river. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosys 18:742–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jähnig SC, Brabec K, Buffagni A, Erba S, Lorenz AW, Ofenböck T, Verdonschot PFM, Hering D (2010) A comparative analysis of restoration measures and their effects on hydromorphology and benthic invertebrates in 26 central and southern European rivers. J Appl Ecol 47:671–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kail J, Hering D (2009) The influence of adjacent stream reaches on the local ecological status of Central European mountain streams. River Res Appl 25:537–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiffney PM, Richardson JS, Bull JP (2003) Responses of periphyton and insects to experimental manipulation of riparian buffer width along forest streams. J Appl Ecol 40:1060–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz AW, Jähnig SC, Hering D (2009) Re-meandering German lowland streams—qualitative and quantitative effects of restoration measures on hydromorphology and benthic invertebrates. Environ Manage 44:745–754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCook LJ (1994) Understanding ecological community succession: causal models and theories, a review. Vegetatio 110:115–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merten EC, Snobl ZR, Wellnitz TA (2014) Microhabitat influences on stream insect emergence. Aquat Sci 76:165–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner AM, Knudsen EE, Soiseth C, Robertson AL, Schell D, Phillips IT, Magnusson K (2000) Colonization and development of stream communities across a 200-year gradient in Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska, USA. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:2319–2335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narf RP (1985) Aquatic insect colonization and substrate changes in a relocated stream segment. Gt Lakes Entomol 18:83–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Nienhuis PH, Buijse AD, Leuven RSEW, Smits AJM, De Nooij RJW, Samborska EM (2002) Ecological rehabilitation of the lowland basin of the river Rhine (NW Europe). Hydrobiologia 478:53–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijboer RC, Schmidt-Kloiber A (2004) The effect of excluding taxa with low abundances or taxa with small distribution ranges on ecological assessment. Hydrobiologia 516:349–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MA, Menninger HL, Bernhardt E (2010) River restoration, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity: a failure of theory or practice? Freshw Biol 55:205–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkyn SM, Smith BJ (2011) Dispersal constraints for stream invertebrates: setting realistic timescales for biodiversity restoration. Environ Manage 48:602–614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parkyn SM, Davies-Colley RJ, Halliday NJ, Costley KJ, Croker GF (2003) Planted riparian buffer zones in New Zealand: do they live up to expectations? Restor Ecol 11:436–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul MJ, Meyer JL (2001) Streams in the urban landscape. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:333–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson CT, Schuwirth N, Baumgartner S, Stamm C (2014) Spatial relationships between land-use, habitat, water quality and lotic macroinvertebrates in two Swiss catchments. Aquat Sci 76:375–392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rose NL (2007) Lochnagar—The natural history of a mountain lake—developments in paleoenvironmental research, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruhí A, Boix D, Gascón S, Sala J, Quintana XD (2013) Nestedness and successional trajectories of macroinvertebrate assemblages in man-made wetlands. Oecologia 171:545–556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith FS, Venugopal PD, Baker ME, Lamp WO (2015) Habitat filtering and adult dispersal determine the taxonomic composition of stream insects in an urbanizing landscape. Freschw Biol 60:1740–1754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundermann A, Stoll S, Haase P (2011) River restoration success depends on the species pool of the immediate surroundings. Ecol Appl 21:1962–1971

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tonkin JD, Stoll S, Sundermann A, Haase P (2014) Dispersal distance and the pool of taxa, but not barriers, determine the colonisation of restored river reaches by benthic invertebrates. Freshw Biol 59:1843–1855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Brink FWB, Van der Velde G, Buijse AD, Klink AG (1996) Biodiversity in the lower Rhine and Meuse river-floodplains: its significance for ecological river management. Aquat Ecol 30:129–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen CHA, Huig N, Van der Velde G, Van Alen T, Wagemaker CAM, Sheerman CDH, Klaassen M, Figuerola J (2013) How did this snail get here? Several dispersal vectors inferred for an aquatic invasive species. Freshw Biol 58:88–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verdonschot PFM (2009) Impact of hydromorphology and spatial scale on macroinvertebrate assembalge composition in streams. Integr Environ Assess Manage 5:97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Bertrab M, Krein A, Stendera S, Thielen F, Hering D (2013) Is fine sediment deposition a main driver for the composition of benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages? Ecol Indic 24:589–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh CJ, Roy AH, Feminella JW, Cottingham PD, Groffman PM, Raymond PM II (2005) The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure. J N Am Benthol Soc 24:706–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winking C, Lorenz AW, Sures B, Hering D (2014) Recolonisation patterns of benthic invertebrates: a field investigation of restored former sewage channels. Freshw Biol 59:1932–1944

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Martin Sondermann for helping with calculating the land use patterns. The Emschergenossenschaft/Lippeverband (Essen) we thank for help with logistics and for providing data on the study streams. This study was financed by the project KuLaRuhr as part of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research programme ‘Sustainable land use’ (BMBF, project number: 033L020A, http://www.kularuhr.de).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline Winking.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Winking, C., Lorenz, A.W., Sures, B. et al. Start at zero: succession of benthic invertebrate assemblages in restored former sewage channels. Aquat Sci 78, 683–694 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-015-0459-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-015-0459-7

Keywords

Navigation