Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Aftershock Decay Rates in the Iranian Plateau

  • Published:
Pure and Applied Geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Motivated by the desire to have more information following the occurrence of damaging events, the main purpose of this article is to study aftershock sequence parameters in the Iranian plateau. To this end, the catalogue of the Iranian earthquakes between 2002 to the end of 2013 has been collected and homogenized among which 15 earthquakes have been selected to study their aftershock decay rates. For different tectonic provinces, the completeness magnitudes (M c) of the earthquake catalogue have been calculated in different time intervals. Also, the M c variability in spatial and temporal windows has been determined for each selected event. For major Iranian earthquakes, catalogue of aftershocks has been collected thanks to three declustering methods: first, the classical windowing method of Gardner and Knopoff (Bull Seismol Soc Am 64:1363–1367, 1974); second, a modified version of this using spatial windowing based on the Wells and Coppersmith (Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:974–1002, 1994) relations; and third, the Burkhard and Grünthal (Swiss J Geosci 102:149–188, 2009) scheme. Effects of the temporal windows also have been investigated using the time periods of 1 month, 100 days, and 1 year in the declustering method of Gardner and Knopoff (Bull Seismol Soc Am 64:1363–1367, 1974). In the next step, the modified Omori law coefficients have been calculated for the 15 selected earthquakes. The calibrated regional generic model describing the temporal and magnitude distribution of aftershocks is of interest for time-dependent seismic hazard forecasts. The regional characteristics of the aftershock decay rates have been studied for the selected Iranian earthquakes in the Alborz, Zagros and Central Iran regions considering their different seismotectonics regimes. However, due to the lack of sufficient data, no results have been reported for the Kopeh-Dagh and Makran seismotectonic regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control. 19 716–723.

  • Aki, K. (1965). Maximum likelihood estimate of b in the formula log N = a–bM and its conference limits, Bull. Earthquke Re. Ins. Tokyo Univ. 43 237-239.

  • Berberian, M. (1976). Contribution to the seismotectonics of Iran (part II-III): In commemoration of the 50th anniversary of the Pahlavi dynasty: Ministry of Industry and Mines, Geological Survey of Iran, Tectonic and Seismotectonic Section.

  • Berberian, M. (1981). Active faulting and tectonics of Iran: in: Zagros-Hindukush-Himalaya Geodynamic evolution, Gupta, H. K. and Delany, Am. Geophys. Union and Geol. Soc. Am., Geodynamic Series. 3 33–69.

  • Burkhard, M., and Grünthal, G. (2009). Seismic Source Zone Characterization for the Seismic Hazard Assessment Project Pegasos by the Expert Group 2 (Eg1b), Swiss Journal of Geosciences. 102 149–188.

  • Byrne, D., Sykes, L. (1992). Great thrust earthquake and aseismic slip along the plate boundary of Makran subduction zone, Journal of Geophysical Research. 97 (B1) 449–478.

  • Cao, A., and Gao, S. S. (2002). Temporal Variation of Seismic B-Values beneath Northeastern Japan Island Arc, Geophysical research letters. 29 48-41-48-43.

  • Christophersen, A., Rhoades, D.A., and Hainzl, S. (2013). Sensitivity study of aftershock occurrence for a Wellington Fault earthquake. In proceedings, New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Technical Conference, Wellington, New Zealand, 26–28 April, 2013. 8.

  • Dieterich, J. H. (1986). Model for the Nucleation of Earthquake Slip, Geophysical Monograph Series. 37 37–47.

  • Dieterich, J. H. (1987). Nucleation and Triggering of Earthquake Slip: Effect of Periodic Stresses, Tectonophysics. 144 127–139.

  • Dieterich, J.H. (1988). Probability of earthquake recurrence with non-uniform stress ate and time-dependent failure, Pure and Applied Geophysics. 12 b 589–617.

  • Dieterich, J. (1994). A Constitutive Law for Rate of Earthquake Production and Its Application to Earthquake Clustering, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth (1978–2012). 99 2601–2618.

  • Eberhart-Phillips, D. (1998). Aftershocks sequence parameter in New Zealand, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 88 1095–1097.

  • Ebrahimian, H., Jalayer, F., Asprone, D., Lombardi, A. M., Marzocchi, W., Prota, A., and Manfredi, G. (2013). Adaptive daily forecasting of seismic aftershock hazard. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

  • Enescu, B., and Ito, K. (2002). Spatial analysis of the frequency-magnitude distribution and decay rate of aftershock activity of the 2000 Western Tottori earthquake. Earth, planets and space, 54(8), 847–859.

  • Enescu, B., Enescu, D., and Ito, K. (2011). Values of B and P: Their Variations and Relation to Physical Processes for Earthquakes in Japan and Romania, Rom. Journ. Phys. 56 590–608.

  • Freed, A. M. (2012). Earthquakes: Casting stress shadows. Nature Geoscience, 5(6), 371–372.

  • Frohlich, C., and Davis, S.D. (1990). Single-link cluster analysis as a method to evaluate spatial and temporal properties of earthquake catalogues. Geophy. J. Inter. 100, 19–32.

  • Gardner, J., and Knopoff, L. (1974). Is the Sequence of Earthquakes in Southern California, with Aftershocks Removed, Poissonian? Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 64 1363–1367.

  • Hamdache, M., Peláez, J., and Talbi, A. (2013). Analysis of aftershock sequences in South and Southeastern Spain. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 63, 55–76.

  • Hessami, K., and Jamali, F. (2006). Explanatory Notes to the Map of Major Active Faults of Iran, Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering. 8(1) 1–11.

  • Hough, S., and Jones, L. (1997). Aftershocks: Are They Earthquakes or Afterthoughts? Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union. 78 505–508.

  • Jackson, J., and McKenzie, D. (1988). The Relationship between Plate Motions and Seismic Moment Tensors, and the Rates of Active Deformation in the Mediterranean and Middle East, Geophysical Journal. 93 45–73.

  • Kagan, Y., and Jackson, D. (1991). Seismic Gap Hypothesis: Ten years after, Journal of Geophysical Research. 96(B13) 21419–21431.

  • Kagan, Y. Y., and Houston, H. (2005). Relation between Main shock Rupture Process and Omori’s Law for Aftershock Moment Release Rate, Geophysical Journal International. 163, 1039–1048.

  • Karimiparidari, S., Zaré, M., Memarian, H., and Kijko, A. (2013). Iranian earthquakes, a uniform catalog with moment magnitudes. Journal of Seismology, 17(3), 897–911.

  • Khodaverdian, A., Zafarani, H., Rahimian, M., and Dehnamaki, V.  (2016). Seismicity Parameters and Spatially-Smoothed Seismicity Model for Iran, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 106(3). doi:10.1785/0120150178

  • Khodaverdian, A., Zafarani, H., and Rahimian, M. (2015). Long term fault slip rates, distributed deformation rates and forecast of seismicity in the Iranian Plateau, Tectonics. 34(10), 2190–2220.

  • Kisslinger, C., and Jones, L. M. (1991). Properties of Aftershock Sequences in Southern California, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth (1978–2012). 96 11947–11958.

  • Kisslinger, C. (1996). Aftershocks and Fault-Zone Properties, Advances in geophysics. 38 1–36.

  • Lolli, B., and Gasperini, P. (2003). Aftershocks Hazard in Italy Part I: Estimation of Time-Magnitude Distribution Model Parameters and Computation of Probabilities of Occurrence, Journal of seismology. 7 235–257.

  • Michael, A. J. (2012). Do aftershock probabilities decay with time? Seismological Research Letters, 83(4), 630–632.

  • Mirzaei, N., Gao, M., and Chen, Y. T. (1998). Seismic source regionalization for seismic zoning of Iran: major seismotectonic provinces, Journal of Earthquake Prediction Research. 7 465–495.

  • Narteau, C., Byrdina, S., Shebalin, P., and Schorlemmer, D. (2009). Common dependence on stress for the two fundamental laws of statistical seismology. Nature, 462(7273), 642–645.

  • Nava, F., Granados, J., and Márquez, V. (2011). Aftershock Identification Through Genetic Fault-Plane Fitting: INTECH Open Access Publisher.

  • Nuttli, O. W. (1973). Seismic wave attenuation and magnitude relations for eastern North America. Journal of Geophysical Research, 78(5), 876–885.

  • Ni, J., and Barazangi, M. (1986). Seismotectonics of the Zagros continental collision zone and a comparison with the Himalayas, Journal of Geophysical Research. 91 8205–8218.

  • Nowroozi, A. A. (1976). Seismotectonic provinces of Iran. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 66(4), 1249–1276.

  • Ogata, Y. (1983). Estimation of the Parameters in the Modified Omori Formula for Aftershock Frequencies by the Maximum Likelihood Procedure, Journal of Physics of the Earth. 31 115–124.

  • Ogata, Y. (1988). Statistical models for earthquake occurrences and residual analysis for point processes, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. Applic. 83 (401) 9–27.

  • Ogata, Y. (1999). Seismicity analysis through point-process modeling: A review. Pure and applied geophysics, 155(2–4), 471–507.

  • Ogata, Y., and Katsura, K. (1993). Analysis of Temporal and Spatial Heterogeneity of Magnitude Frequency Distribution Inferred from Earthquake Catalogues, Geophysical Journal International. 113 727–738.

  • Pollock, D. (2007). Aspect of short-term and long-term seismic hazard assessment in New Zealand, Diploma thesis, Institute of Geophysics, ETH Zurich, 90P.

  • Reasenberg, P. A., and Jones, L. M. (1989). Earthquake Hazard after a Main shock in California, Science. 243, 1173–1176.

  • Rundle J.B., Turcotte, D.L., Klein W., and editors (1996b). Reduction and predictability of natural disaster, Santa Fe Institute Studies in Science of Complexity (Addison-Wesley 1996b).

  • Shahvar, M. P., Zare, M., and Castellaro, S. (2013). A Unified Seismic Catalog for the Iranian Plateau (1900–2011), Seismological Research Letters. 84 233–249.

  • Shaw, B. E. (1993). Generalized Omori Law for Aftershocks and Foreshocks from a Simple Dynamics, Geophysical research letters. 20 907–910.

  • Shcherbakov, R., Turcotte, D. L., and Rundle, J. B. (2004). A Generalized Omori’s Law for Earthquake Aftershock Decay, Geophysical research letters. 31 1–5.

  • Shoja-Taheri, J., and Niazi, M. (1981). Seismicity of the Iranian plateau and bordering regions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 71(2), 477–489.

  • Sonley, E., and Atkinson, G. M. (2005). Empirical relationship between moment magnitude and Nuttli magnitude for small-magnitude earthquakes in southeastern Canada. Seismological Research Letters, 76(6), 752–755.

  • Toda, S., Stein, R. S., Beroza, G. C., and Marsan, D. (2012). Aftershocks halted by static stress shadows. Nature Geoscience, 5(6), 410–413.

  • Utsu, T. (1961). A Statistical Study on the Occurrence of Aftershocks, Geophys. Mag. 30 521–605.

  • Utsu, T., (1970). Aftershocks and earthquake statistics (II)—further investigation of aftershock and earthquake sequences based on new classification of earthquake sequences. J. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Univ. Ser. VII 3, 197–266.

  • Utsu, T., and Ogata, Y. (1995). The centenary of the Omori formula for a decay law of aftershock activity. Journal of Physics of the Earth, 43(1), 1–33.

  • Van Stiphout, T., Zhuang, J., and Marsan, D. (2012). Seismicity declustering. Community Online Resource for Statistical Seismicity Analysis. doi:10.5078/corssa-52382934.

  • Vernant, P., Nilforoushan, F., Hatzfeld, D., Abbassi, M.R., Vigny, C., Masson, F., Nankali, H., Martinod, J., Ashtiani, A., Bayer, R., Tavakoli, F., and Chery, J. (2004). Present-day crustal deformation and plate kinematics in theMiddle East constrained by GPS measurements in Iran and northern Oman, Geophysical Journal International, 157, 381–398.

  • Wells, D. L., and Coppersmith, K. J. (1994). New Empirical Relationships among Magnitude, Rupture Length, Rupture Width, Rupture Area, and Surface Displacement, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 84 974–1002.

  • Wiemer, S., and Katsumata, K. (1999). Spatial Variability of Seismicity Parameters in Aftershock Zones, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth (1978–2012). 104 13135–13151.

  • Wiemer, S., and Wyss, M. (2000). Minimum Magnitude of Completeness in Earthquake Catalogs: Examples from Alaska, the Western United States, and Japan. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 90 859–869.

  • Woessner, J., and Wiemer, S. (2005). Assessing the Quality of Earthquake Catalogues: Estimating the Magnitude of Completeness and Its Uncertainty, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 95 684–698.

  • Zafarani, H., and Soghrat, M. (2012). Simulation of Ground Motion in the Zagros Region of Iran Using the Specific Barrier Model and the Stochastic Method, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 102 2031–2045.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Stefan Wiemer for the ZMAP software and M. Tatar for very useful discussions. This study was supported by the International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES), Project No. 9612: “Prediction of Aftershock Hazard in the Iranian Plateau using the Statistical Methods”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES), No. 26, Arghavan St., North Dibajee, Farmanieh, P.O. Box: 19395/3913, Tehran, Iran

    S. Ommi, H. Zafarani & M. Zare

Authors
  1. S. Ommi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. Zafarani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Zare
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Zafarani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ommi, S., Zafarani, H. & Zare, M. Aftershock Decay Rates in the Iranian Plateau. Pure Appl. Geophys. 173, 2305–2324 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-016-1285-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-016-1285-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation