Skip to main content
Log in

Are the Laws of Physics Inevitable?

  • Published:
Physics in Perspective Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Social constructionists believe that experimental evidence plays a minimal role in the production of scientific knowledge, while rationalists such as myself believe that experimental evidence is crucial in it. As one historical example in support of the rationalist position, I trace in some detail the theoretical and experimental research that led to our understanding of beta decay, from Enrico Fermi’s pioneering theory of 1934 to George Sudarshan and Robert Marshak’s and Richard Feynman and Murray Gell-Mann’s suggestion in 1957 and 1958, respectively, of the VA theory of weak interactions. This is not a history of an unbroken string of successes, but one that includes incorrect experimental results, incorrect experiment-theory comparisons, and faulty theoretical analyses. Nevertheless, we shall see that the constraints that Nature imposed made the VA theory an almost inevitable outcome of this theoretical and experimental research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allan Franklin.

Additional information

Allan Franklin: Allan Franklin is Professor of Physics at the University of Colorado. He works on the history and philosophy of physics, particularly on the roles of experiment.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franklin, A. Are the Laws of Physics Inevitable?. Phys. perspect. 10, 182–211 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00016-006-0309-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00016-006-0309-z

Keywords:

Navigation