Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Society of Behavioral Medicine (SBM) position statement: ban indoor tanning for minors

  • Practice and Public Health Policies
  • Published:
Translational Behavioral Medicine

ABSTRACT

The Society of Behavioral Medicine (SBM), an interdisciplinary professional organization focused on the science of health behavior joins the American Academy of Dermatology, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a host of other national and international organizations in support of a total ban on indoor tanning for minors under the age of 18. According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer, artificial sources of ultraviolet radiation are in the highest category of carcinogens, joining tobacco and asbestos. Strong evidence links indoor tanning to increased risk for melanoma with repeated exposure during childhood being associated with the greatest increase in risk. Several countries and five US states have passed legislation banning indoor tanning in minors. We strongly encourage the remaining US states to do the same in an effort to protect children and prevent new cases of melanoma. SBM also strongly encourages research that explores the use of tanning beds in the home. Home-based indoor tanning has the potential to be especially dangerous given the complete absence of safety regulations. Children are currently protected from exposure to health-harming substances like tobacco and lead; thus, legislation protecting them from artificial sources of ultraviolet radiation is yet another important step forward in improving public health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Report on carcinogens, exposure to sunlamps or sunbeds, N.T.P. Public Health Service, Editor. 2011: USDHHS.

  2. FDA. Indoor Tanning: The Risks of Ultraviolet Rays. 2010.

  3. American Academy of Pediatrics. Policy statement: ultraviolet radiation, a hazard to children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2011; 104(2): 328.

    Google Scholar 

  4. American Academy of Dermatology. Indoor tanning. 2013 [cited 2013 April 5].

  5. Canadian Pediatric Society. Banning children and youth under the age of 18 years from commercial tanning facilities. [May 1, 2013]; Available from: http://www.cps.ca/en/documents/position/tanning-facilities. Accessed 25 Jul 2013.

  6. IARC Working Group. Exposure to artificial UV light and skin cancer: summary and conclusion. In: I.W. Group, ed. IARC Working Group Reports. Lyons: WHO; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wehner MR et al. Indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Bmj. 2012; 345: e5909.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Boniol M et al. Cutaneous melanoma attributable to sunbed use: systematic review and meta-analysis. Bmj. 2012; 345: e4757.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Epidemiologic notes and reports injuries associated with ultraviolet tanning devices—Wisconsin. In: CDC, ed. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR). Atlanta: Department of Health and Human Services; 1989: 333-335.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Walters BL, Kelley TM. Commercial tanning facilities: a new source of eye injury. Am J Emerg Med. 1987; 5(5): 386-389.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cust AE et al. Sunbed use during adolescence and early adulthood is associated with increased risk of early-onset melanoma. Int J Cancer. 2011; 128(10): 2425-2435.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nolan BV et al. Tanning as an addictive behavior: a literature review. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2009; 25(1): 12-19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Harrington CR et al. Addictive-like behaviours to ultraviolet light among frequent indoor tanners. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2011; 36(1): 33-38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Heckman CJ et al. A preliminary investigation of the predictors of tanning dependence. Am J Health Behav. 2008; 32(5): 451-464.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mosher CE, Danoff-Burg S. Addiction to indoor tanning: relation to anxiety, depression, and substance use. Arch Dermatol. 2010; 146(4): 412-417.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mosher CE, Danoff-Burg S. Indoor tanning, mental health, and substance use among college students: the significance of gender. J Health Psychol. 2010; 15(6): 819-827.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Poorsattar SP, Hornung RL. UV light abuse and high-risk tanning behavior among undergraduate college students. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007; 56(3): 375-379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hillhouse JJ et al. Evaluating a measure of tanning abuse and dependence. Arch Dermatol. 2012; 148(7): 815-819.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. National Conference of State Legislatures. Indoor tanning restrictions for minors: A state-by-state comparison. 2013 [cited 2013 April 5, 2013]; Available from: http://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/health/indoor-tanning-restrictions.aspx. Accessed 25 Jul 2013.

  20. Mayer JA et al. Adolescents' use of indoor tanning: a large-scale evaluation of psychosocial, environmental, and policy-level correlates. Am J Public Health. 2011; 101(5): 930-938.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Choi K et al. Prevalence and characteristics of indoor tanning use among men and women in the United States. Arch Dermatol. 2010; 146(12): 1356-1361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Magee KH et al. Tanning device usage: what are parents thinking? Pediatr Dermatol. 2007; 24(3): 216-221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Baker MK, Hillhouse JJ, Liu X. The effect of initial indoor tanning with mother on current tanning patterns. Arch Dermatol. 2010; 146(12): 1427-1428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cokkinides VE et al. Use of indoor tanning sunlamps by US youth, ages 11-18 years, and by their parent or guardian caregivers: Prevalence and correlates. Pediatrics. 2002; 109(6): 1124-1130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hoerster KD et al. The influence of parents and peers on adolescent indoor tanning behavior: findings from a multi-city sample. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007; 57(6): 990-997.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Stryker JE et al. Maternal/female caregiver influences on adolescent indoor tanning. J Adolesc Health. 2004; 35(6): 528 e1-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zeller S et al. Do adolescent indoor tanners exhibit dependency? J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006; 54(4): 589-596.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cokkinides VE et al. Indoor tanning use among adolescent in the United States, 1998 to 2004. Cancer. 2009; 115(1): 190-198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Forster JL et al. Compliance with restrictions on sale of indoor tanning sessions to youth in Minnesota and Massachusetts. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006; 55(6): 962-967.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Culley CA et al. Compliance with federal and state legislation by indoor tanning facilities in San Diego. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001; 44(1): 53-60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hoerster KD et al. Density of indoor tanning facilities in 116 large U.S. cities. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 36(3): 243-246.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jain N, Rademaker A, Robinson JK. Implementation of the federal excise tax on indoor tanning services in Illinois. Arch Dermatol. 2012; 148(1): 122-124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hornung RL et al. Tanning facility use: are we exceeding Food and Drug Administration limits? J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003; 49(4): 655-661.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pichon LC et al. Youth access to artificial UV radiation exposure: practices of 3647 US indoor tanning facilities. Arch Dermatol. 2009; 145(9): 997-1002.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Pawlak MT et al. Legislation restricting access to indoor tanning throughout the world. Arch Dermatol. 2012; 148(9): 1006-1012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hester EJ, et al. Archives of Dermatology. 141, Compliance with youth access regulations for indoor UV tanning. 8(959-962).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sherry Pagoto PhD.

Additional information

Implications

Practice: Clinicians working with patients who engage in indoor tanning should educate them about the health risks and be aware that some tanners may develop a “dependency” on tanning that resembles substance dependence.

Policy: SBM proposes a ban on indoor tanning in minors under the age of 18 as a measure to reduce the prevalence of melanoma in the US.

Research: Research is needed to evaluate the impact of indoor tanning related policy as well as indoor tanning that occurs in non-legislated contexts, such as in the home.

About this article

Cite this article

Pagoto, S., Hillhouse, J., Heckman, C.J. et al. Society of Behavioral Medicine (SBM) position statement: ban indoor tanning for minors. Behav. Med. Pract. Policy Res. 4, 124–126 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-013-0240-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-013-0240-1

KEYWORDS

Navigation