Skip to main content
Log in

The relationship between scientists and science: knowledge-based innovation output

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many scientists were respected by people and science has made great development in the twentieth century. What role do scientists play in the process of scientific development? Does scientific development bring more researchers into scientists? This paper mainly analyzes the two interested questions and suggests that: (a) not all researchers’ output could be attributed to scientific knowledge, only the innovative output could promote science to develop. Scientists play a more significant role than the rest researchers in scientific development in average because scientists’ innovative consciousness is far higher than that of non-scientists. (b) Distinguishing scientists from researchers in accordance with the fixed basic contribution of innovative output in the process of scientific development. Researchers’ innovative work becomes easier with the accumulated scientific knowledge growing gradually in the initial stage of scientific development. Thus, scientific development could produce more and more scientists. On the contrary, researchers’ innovative work becomes more challenged with the accumulated scientific knowledge increasing gradually while science develops to a certain stage. As a result, scientific development would make researchers become scientist increasingly difficult.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Statistics calculated according to 2011 SCI and EI indexed papers of authors’ units.

References

  • Adam, J. (1998). Benchmarking International Research. Nature, 396(6712), 615–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1955). Citation Indexes to Sciences: A New Dimension in Documentation Through Association of Ideas. Science, 122(3159), 108–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golub, B. (2002). Motivational factors in departure of young scientists from Croatian science. Scientometrics, 53(3), 429–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prpić, K. (1998). Science Ethics: A Study of Eminent Scientists’ Professional Values. Scientometrics, 43(2), 269–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, H., Kushmerick, A., & Benson, D. (2008). Scientists’ perceptions of the social and political implications of their research. Scientometrics, 74(2), 207–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swinbanks, D., Nathan, R., & Triendl, R. (1997). Western Research Assessment Meets Asian Cultures. Nature, 389(6647), 113–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Xu, S., Peng, L., Wang, Z., Wang, C., & Zhang, C. (2012). Exploring Scientists’ Working Timetable: Do Scientists Often Work Overtime? Journal of Informatics, 6(4), 655–660.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Zhao, H., Li, Q., Wang, J., & Tan, X. (2010). Establishment of paper assessment system based on academic disciplinary benchmarks. Scientometrics, 84(2), 421–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thanks for support through the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Key Program) grant No.71033002; and the National Natural Science Foundation of China grant No. 71173026.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erzi Tang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tang, E., Liu, F., Sun, J. et al. The relationship between scientists and science: knowledge-based innovation output. Scientometrics 98, 1827–1835 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1138-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1138-x

Keywords

Navigation