Skip to main content
Log in

A decade since ”diversification of ruminants”: has our knowledge improved?

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract 

In his landmark 1989 paper, R.R. Hofmann classified ruminants into three categories based upon digestive anatomy and preferred forages, and proposed that divergence of feeding strategies among ruminants is a result of morphological evolution of the digestive tract. Because of the hypothetical nature of these views and the ingrained beliefs that they challenged, several papers were published that reported tests of Hofmann’s predictions. The consensus among these papers was that Hofmann’s predictions were inadequate. I describe the experimental evidence that has been put forth in opposition to the ruminant diversification hypothesis and contend that we have failed to adequately test Hofmann’s predictions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 11 October 1999 / Accepted: 6 April 2000

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ditchkoff, S. A decade since ”diversification of ruminants”: has our knowledge improved?. Oecologia 125, 82–84 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00008894

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00008894

Key words

Navigation