Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring double field theory

  • Published:
Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider a flux formulation of Double Field Theory in which fluxes are dynamical and field-dependent. Gauge consistency imposes a set of quadratic constraints on the dynamical fluxes, which can be solved by truly double configurations. The constraints are related to generalized Bianchi Identities for (non-)geometric fluxes in the double space, sourced by (exotic) branes. Following previous constructions, we then obtain generalized connections, torsion and curvatures compatible with the consistency conditions. The strong constraint-violating terms needed to make contact with gauged supergravities containing duality orbits of non-geometric fluxes, systematically arise in this formulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M.J. Duff, Duality rotations in string theory, Nucl. Phys. B 335 (1990) 610 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. M.J. Duff and J.X. Lu, Duality rotations in membrane theory, Nucl. Phys. B 347 (1990) 394 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. A.A. Tseytlin, Duality symmetric closed string theory and interacting chiral scalars, Nucl. Phys. B 350 (1991) 395 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. A.A. Tseytlin, Duality symmetric formulation of string world sheet dynamics, Phys. Lett. B 242 (1990) 163 [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. W. Siegel, Superspace duality in low-energy superstrings, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 2826 [hep-th/9305073] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. W. Siegel, Two vierbein formalism for string inspired axionic gravity, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 5453 [hep-th/9302036] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. C. Hull and B. Zwiebach, Double field theory, JHEP 09 (2009) 099 [arXiv:0904.4664] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Hull and B. Zwiebach, The gauge algebra of double field theory and Courant brackets, JHEP 09 (2009) 090 [arXiv:0908.1792] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. O. Hohm, C. Hull and B. Zwiebach, Background independent action for double field theory, JHEP 07 (2010) 016 [arXiv:1003.5027] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. O. Hohm, C. Hull and B. Zwiebach, Generalized metric formulation of double field theory, JHEP 08 (2010) 008 [arXiv:1006.4823] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. C.M. Hull, A geometry for non-geometric string backgrounds, JHEP 10 (2005) 065 [hep-th/0406102] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. C.M. Hull, Doubled geometry and T-folds, JHEP 07 (2007) 080 [hep-th/0605149] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Dabholkar and C. Hull, Generalised T-duality and non-geometric backgrounds, JHEP 05 (2006) 009 [hep-th/0512005] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. C.M. Hull and R.A. Reid-Edwards, Gauge symmetry, T-duality and doubled geometry, JHEP 08 (2008) 043 [arXiv:0711.4818] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. C.M. Hull and R.A. Reid-Edwards, Non-geometric backgrounds, doubled geometry and generalised T-duality, JHEP 09 (2009) 014 [arXiv:0902.4032] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. G. Dall’Agata, N. Prezas, H. Samtleben and M. Trigiante, Gauged supergravities from twisted doubled tori and non-geometric string backgrounds, Nucl. Phys. B 799 (2008) 80 [arXiv:0712.1026] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. O. Hohm and S.K. Kwak, Frame-like geometry of double field theory, J. Phys. A 44 (2011) 085404 [arXiv:1011.4101] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. N. Hitchin, Generalized Calabi-Yau manifolds, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. 54 (2003) 281 [math.DG/0209099] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Gualtieri, Generalized complex geometry, math.DG/0401221 [INSPIRE].

  20. C.M. Hull, Generalised geometry for M-theory, JHEP 07 (2007) 079 [hep-th/0701203] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. P.P. Pacheco and D. Waldram, M-theory, exceptional generalised geometry and superpotentials, JHEP 09 (2008) 123 [arXiv:0804.1362] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. A. Coimbra, C. Strickland-Constable and D. Waldram, Supergravity as generalised geometry II: E d(d) × \( \mathbb{R} \) + and M-theory, arXiv:1212.1586 [INSPIRE].

  23. A. Coimbra, C. Strickland-Constable and D. Waldram, E d(d) × \( \mathbb{R} \) + generalised geometry, connections and M-theory, arXiv:1112.3989 [INSPIRE].

  24. D.S. Berman, M. Cederwall, A. Kleinschmidt and D.C. Thompson, The gauge structure of generalised diffeomorphisms, JHEP 01 (2013) 064 [arXiv:1208.5884] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. D.S. Berman, H. Godazgar, M.J. Perry and P. West, Duality invariant actions and generalised geometry, JHEP 02 (2012) 108 [arXiv:1111.0459] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. D.S. Berman, H. Godazgar, M. Godazgar and M.J. Perry, The local symmetries of M-theory and their formulation in generalised geometry, JHEP 01 (2012) 012 [arXiv:1110.3930] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. D.S. Berman and M.J. Perry, Generalized geometry and M-theory, JHEP 06 (2011) 074 [arXiv:1008.1763] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. J.-H. Park and Y. Suh, U-geometry: SL(5), JHEP 04 (2013) 147 [arXiv:1302.1652] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. M. Cederwall, J. Edlund and A. Karlsson, Exceptional geometry and tensor fields, arXiv:1302.6736 [INSPIRE].

  30. G. Aldazabal, M. Graña, D. Marqués and J.A. Rosabal, Extended geometry and gauged maximal supergravity, JHEP 06 (2013) 046 [arXiv:1302.5419] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. P.C. West, E 11 and M-theory, Class. Quant. Grav. 18 (2001) 4443 [hep-th/0104081] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. F. Riccioni and P.C. West, The E 11 origin of all maximal supergravities, JHEP 07 (2007) 063 [arXiv:0705.0752] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. F. Riccioni and P.C. West, E 11 -extended spacetime and gauged supergravities, JHEP 02 (2008) 039 [arXiv:0712.1795] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. F. Riccioni, D. Steele and P.C. West, The E 11 origin of all maximal supergravities: the hierarchy of field-strengths, JHEP 09 (2009) 095 [arXiv:0906.1177] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. P.C. West, Generalised geometry, eleven dimensions and E 11, JHEP 02 (2012) 018 [arXiv:1111.1642] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. H. Godazgar, M. Godazgar and M.J. Perry, E 8 duality and dual gravity, JHEP 06 (2013) 044 [arXiv:1303.2035] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. D.C. Thompson, Duality invariance: from M-theory to double field theory, JHEP 08 (2011) 125 [arXiv:1106.4036] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. O. Hohm, T-duality versus gauge symmetry, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 188 (2011) 116 [arXiv:1101.3484] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. B. Zwiebach, Double field theory, T-duality and courant brackets, Lect. Notes Phys. 851 (2012) 265 [arXiv:1109.1782] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. G. Aldazabal, D. Marques and C. Núñez, Double field theory: a pedagogical review, arXiv:1305.1907 [INSPIRE].

  41. O. Hohm and S.K. Kwak, Massive type II in double field theory, JHEP 11 (2011) 086 [arXiv:1108.4937] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. G. Aldazabal, W. Baron, D. Marques and C. Núñez, The effective action of double field theory, JHEP 11 (2011) 052 [Erratum ibid. 11 (2011) 109] [arXiv:1109.0290] [INSPIRE].

  43. D. Geissbuhler, Double field theory and N “ 4 gauged supergravity, JHEP 11 (2011) 116 [arXiv:1109.4280] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. M. Graña and D. Marques, Gauged double field theory, JHEP 04 (2012) 020 [arXiv:1201.2924] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. J. Scherk and J.H. Schwarz, How to get masses from extra dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 153 (1979) 61 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. J. Shelton, W. Taylor and B. Wecht, Nongeometric flux compactifications, JHEP 10 (2005) 085 [hep-th/0508133] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. G. Aldazabal, P.G. Camara, A. Font and L.E. Ibáñez, More dual fluxes and moduli fixing, JHEP 05 (2006) 070 [hep-th/0602089] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. G. Aldazabal, E. Andres, P.G. Camara and M. Graña, U-dual fluxes and generalized geometry, JHEP 11 (2010) 083 [arXiv:1007.5509] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. D.S. Berman, E.T. Musaev, D.C. Thompson and D.C. Thompson, Duality invariant M-theory: gauged supergravities and Scherk-Schwarz reductions, JHEP 10 (2012) 174 [arXiv:1208.0020] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. E.T. Musaev, Gauged supergravities in 5 and 6 dimensions from generalised Scherk-Schwarz reductions, JHEP 05 (2013) 161 [arXiv:1301.0467] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. G. Dibitetto, J.J. Fernandez-Melgarejo, D. Marques and D. Roest, Duality orbits of non-geometric fluxes, Fortschr. Phys. 60 (2012) 1123 [arXiv:1203.6562] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. U.H. Danielsson, G. Shiu, T. Van Riet and T. Wrase, A note on obstinate tachyons in classical dS solutions, JHEP 03 (2013) 138 [arXiv:1212.5178] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. U. Danielsson and G. Dibitetto, On the distribution of stable de Sitter vacua, JHEP 03 (2013) 018 [arXiv:1212.4984] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. J. Blaback, U. Danielsson and G. Dibitetto, Fully stable dS vacua from generalised fluxes, arXiv:1301.7073 [INSPIRE].

  55. C. Damian, O. Loaiza-Brito, L. Rey and M. Sabido, Slow-roll inflation in non-geometric flux compactification, arXiv:1302.0529 [INSPIRE].

  56. B. de Carlos, A. Guarino and J.M. Moreno, Flux moduli stabilisation, supergravity algebras and no-go theorems, JHEP 01 (2010) 012 [arXiv:0907.5580] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. B. de Carlos, A. Guarino and J.M. Moreno, Complete classification of Minkowski vacua in generalised flux models, JHEP 02 (2010) 076 [arXiv:0911.2876] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. D. Andriot, M. Larfors, D. Lüst and P. Patalong, A ten-dimensional action for non-geometric fluxes, JHEP 09 (2011) 134 [arXiv:1106.4015] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. D. Andriot, O. Hohm, M. Larfors, D. Lüst and P. Patalong, A geometric action for non-geometric fluxes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 261602 [arXiv:1202.3060] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  60. D. Andriot, O. Hohm, M. Larfors, D. Lüst and P. Patalong, Non-geometric fluxes in supergravity and double field theory, Fortschr. Phys. 60 (2012) 1150 [arXiv:1204.1979] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  61. R. Blumenhagen, A. Deser, E. Plauschinn and F. Rennecke, A bi-invariant Einstein-Hilbert action for the non-geometric string, Phys. Lett. B 720 (2013) 215 [arXiv:1210.1591] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  62. R. Blumenhagen, A. Deser, E. Plauschinn and F. Rennecke, Non-geometric strings, symplectic gravity and differential geometry of Lie algebroids, JHEP 02 (2013) 122 [arXiv:1211.0030] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  63. J. Schon and M. Weidner, Gauged N “ 4 supergravities, JHEP 05 (2006) 034 [hep-th/0602024] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  64. O. Hohm and B. Zwiebach, On the Riemann tensor in double field theory, JHEP 05 (2012) 126 [arXiv:1112.5296] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  65. O. Hohm and B. Zwiebach, Towards an invariant geometry of double field theory, arXiv:1212.1736 [INSPIRE].

  66. I. Jeon, K. Lee and J.-H. Park, Differential geometry with a projection: application to double field theory, JHEP 04 (2011) 014 [arXiv:1011.1324] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  67. I. Jeon, K. Lee and J.-H. Park, Stringy differential geometry, beyond Riemann, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 044022 [arXiv:1105.6294] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  68. A. Coimbra, C. Strickland-Constable and D. Waldram, Supergravity as generalised geometry I: type II theories, JHEP 11 (2011) 091 [arXiv:1107.1733] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  69. D.S. Berman, C.D.A. Blair, E. Malek and M.J. Perry, The O D,D geometry of string theory, arXiv:1303.6727 [INSPIRE].

  70. G. Aldazabal, P.G. Camara and J.A. Rosabal, Flux algebra, Bianchi identities and Freed-Witten anomalies in F-theory compactifications, Nucl. Phys. B 814 (2009) 21 [arXiv:0811.2900] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  71. G. Dall’Agata, G. Villadoro and F. Zwirner, Type-IIA flux compactifications and N “ 4 gauged supergravities, JHEP 08 (2009) 018 [arXiv:0906.0370] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  72. R. Blumenhagen, A. Deser, E. Plauschinn and F. Rennecke, Bianchi identities for non-geometric fluxes — from quasi-Poisson structures to courant algebroids, arXiv:1205.1522 [INSPIRE].

  73. G. Villadoro and F. Zwirner, Beyond twisted tori, Phys. Lett. B 652 (2007) 118 [arXiv:0706.3049] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  74. G. Villadoro and F. Zwirner, On general flux backgrounds with localized sources, JHEP 11 (2007) 082 [arXiv:0710.2551] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  75. J. de Boer and M. Shigemori, Exotic branes and non-geometric backgrounds, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 251603 [arXiv:1004.2521] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  76. J. de Boer and M. Shigemori, Exotic branes in string theory, arXiv:1209.6056 [INSPIRE].

  77. T. Kikuchi, T. Okada and Y. Sakatani, Rotating string in doubled geometry with generalized isometries, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 046001 [arXiv:1205.5549] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  78. F. Hassler and D. Lüst, Non-commutative/non-associative IIA (IIB) Q- and R-branes and their intersections, arXiv:1303.1413 [INSPIRE].

  79. C. Albertsson, T. Kimura and R.A. Reid-Edwards, D-branes and doubled geometry, JHEP 04 (2009) 113 [arXiv:0806.1783] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  80. C. Albertsson, S.-H. Dai, P.-W. Kao and F.-L. Lin, Double field theory for double D-branes, JHEP 09 (2011) 025 [arXiv:1107.0876] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  81. O. Hohm and S.K. Kwak, Double field theory formulation of heterotic strings, JHEP 06 (2011) 096 [arXiv:1103.2136] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  82. I. Jeon, K. Lee and J.-H. Park, Double field formulation of Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Lett. B 701 (2011) 260 [arXiv:1102.0419] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  83. O. Hohm, S.K. Kwak and B. Zwiebach, Unification of type II strings and T-duality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 171603 [arXiv:1106.5452] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  84. O. Hohm, S.K. Kwak and B. Zwiebach, Double field theory of type II strings, JHEP 09 (2011) 013 [arXiv:1107.0008] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  85. I. Jeon, K. Lee and J.-H. Park, Ramond-Ramond cohomology and OpD, Dq T-duality, JHEP 09 (2012) 079 [arXiv:1206.3478] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  86. I. Jeon, K. Lee, J.-H. Park and Y. Suh, Stringy unification of type IIA and IIB supergravities under N “ 2 D “ 10 supersymmetric double field theory, Phys. Lett. B 723 (2013) 245 [arXiv:1210.5078] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  87. I. Jeon, K. Lee and J.-H. Park, Incorporation of fermions into double field theory, JHEP 11 (2011) 025 [arXiv:1109.2035] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  88. O. Hohm and S.K. Kwak, N “ 1 supersymmetric double field theory, JHEP 03 (2012) 080 [arXiv:1111.7293] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  89. I. Jeon, K. Lee and J.-H. Park, Supersymmetric double field theory: stringy reformulation of supergravity, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 081501 [Erratum ibid. D 86 (2012) 089903] [arXiv:1112.0069] [INSPIRE].

  90. D.S. Berman, N.B. Copland and D.C. Thompson, Background field equations for the duality symmetric string, Nucl. Phys. B 791 (2008) 175 [arXiv:0708.2267] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  91. D.S. Berman and D.C. Thompson, Duality symmetric strings, dilatons and Opd, dq effective actions, Phys. Lett. B 662 (2008) 279 [arXiv:0712.1121] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  92. N.B. Copland, Connecting T-duality invariant theories, Nucl. Phys. B 854 (2012) 575 [arXiv:1106.1888] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  93. N.B. Copland, A double σ-model for double field theory, JHEP 04 (2012) 044 [arXiv:1111.1828] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  94. M.P. Garcia del Moral, Dualities as symmetries of the supermembrane theory, arXiv:1211.6265 [INSPIRE].

  95. J. Maharana, The worldsheet perspective of T-duality symmetry in string theory, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28 (2013) 1330011 [arXiv:1302.1719] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  96. G. Dibitetto, A. Guarino and D. Roest, How to halve maximal supergravity, JHEP 06 (2011) 030 [arXiv:1104.3587] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  97. G. Dibitetto, A. Guarino and D. Roest, Exceptional flux compactifications, JHEP 05 (2012) 056 [arXiv:1202.0770] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  98. G. Aldazabal, D. Marques, C. Núñez and J.A. Rosabal, On type IIB moduli stabilization and N “ 4, 8 supergravities, Nucl. Phys. B 849 (2011) 80 [arXiv:1101.5954] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  99. S.K. Kwak, Invariances and equations of motion in double field theory, JHEP 10 (2010) 047 [arXiv:1008.2746] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  100. E. Bergshoeff, R. Kallosh, T. Ort´ın, D. Roest and A. Van Proeyen, New formulations of D“10 supersymmetry and D8-O8 domain walls,Class. Quant. Grav. 18 (2001) 3359 [hep-th/0103233] [INSPIRE].

    Google Scholar 

  101. M. Fukuma, T. Oota and H. Tanaka, Comments on T dualities of Ramond-Ramond potentials on tori, Prog. Theor. Phys. 103 (2000) 425 [hep-th/9907132] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  102. J. Maharana and J.H. Schwarz, Noncompact symmetries in string theory, Nucl. Phys. B 390 (1993) 3 [hep-th/9207016] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  103. D. Andriot, Heterotic string from a higher dimensional perspective, Nucl. Phys. B 855 (2012) 222 [arXiv:1102.1434] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  104. N. Halmagyi, Non-geometric backgrounds and the first order string σ-model, arXiv:0906.2891 [INSPIRE].

  105. M. Graña, R. Minasian, M. Petrini and D. Waldram, T-duality, generalized geometry and non-geometric backgrounds, JHEP 04 (2009) 075 [arXiv:0807.4527] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  106. R. Blumenhagen, A. Deser, E. Plauschinn, F. Rennecke and C. Schmid, The intriguing structure of non-geometric frames in string theory, arXiv:1304.2784 [INSPIRE].

  107. S. Jensen, The KK-monopole/NS5-brane in doubled geometry, JHEP 07 (2011) 088 [arXiv:1106.1174] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  108. E.A. Bergshoeff, A. Marrani and F. Riccioni, Brane orbits, Nucl. Phys. B 861 (2012) 104 [arXiv:1201.5819] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  109. E.A. Bergshoeff and F. Riccioni, The D-brane U-scan, arXiv:1109.1725 [INSPIRE].

  110. E.A. Bergshoeff and F. Riccioni, Branes and wrapping rules, Phys. Lett. B 704 (2011) 367 [arXiv:1108.5067] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  111. E.A. Bergshoeff and F. Riccioni, Dual doubled geometry, Phys. Lett. B 702 (2011) 281 [arXiv:1106.0212] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  112. E.A. Bergshoeff and F. Riccioni, String solitons and T-duality, JHEP 05 (2011) 131 [arXiv:1102.0934] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics, Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Bern, Sidlerstrasse 5, CH-3012, Bern, Switzerland

    David Geissbühler

  2. Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio (CONICET-UBA), C.C. 67-Suc. 28, 1428, Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Diego Marqués & Carmen Núñez

  3. Departamento de Física, Universidad de Buenos Aires (CONICET-UBA), FCEyN-UBA Ciudad Universitaria, Pabellon I, 1428, Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Carmen Núñez & Victor Penas

Authors
  1. David Geissbühler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Diego Marqués
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carmen Núñez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Victor Penas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carmen Núñez.

Additional information

ArXiv ePrint: 1304.1472

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geissbühler, D., Marqués, D., Núñez, C. et al. Exploring double field theory. J. High Energ. Phys. 2013, 101 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2013)101

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2013)101

Keywords

Search

Navigation