Journal of High Energy Physics

, 2013:22

Towards the fast scrambling conjecture

  • Nima Lashkari
  • Douglas Stanford
  • Matthew Hastings
  • Tobias Osborne
  • Patrick Hayden
Article

DOI: 10.1007/JHEP04(2013)022

Cite this article as:
Lashkari, N., Stanford, D., Hastings, M. et al. J. High Energ. Phys. (2013) 2013: 22. doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2013)022

Abstract

Many proposed quantum mechanical models of black holes include highly non-local interactions. The time required for thermalization to occur in such models should reflect the relaxation times associated with classical black holes in general relativity. Moreover, the time required for a particularly strong form of thermalization to occur, sometimes known as scrambling, determines the time scale on which black holes should start to release information. It has been conjectured that black holes scramble in a time logarithmic in their entropy, and that no system in nature can scramble faster. In this article, we address the conjecture from two directions. First, we exhibit two examples of systems that do indeed scramble in logarithmic time: Brownian quantum circuits and the antiferromagnetic Ising model on a sparse random graph. Unfortunately, both fail to be truly ideal fast scramblers for reasons we discuss. Second, we use Lieb-Robinson techniques to prove a logarithmic lower bound on the scrambling time of systems with finite norm terms in their Hamiltonian. The bound holds in spite of any nonlocal structure in the Hamiltonian, which might permit every degree of freedom to interact directly with every other one.

Keywords

Lattice Integrable ModelsM(atrix) TheoriesBlack HolesQuantum Dissipative Systems

Copyright information

© SISSA, Trieste, Italy 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nima Lashkari
    • 1
  • Douglas Stanford
    • 2
  • Matthew Hastings
    • 3
    • 4
  • Tobias Osborne
    • 5
  • Patrick Hayden
    • 1
    • 6
    • 7
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Stanford Institute for Theoretical Physics, Department of PhysicsStanford UniversityStanfordU.S.A
  3. 3.Department of PhysicsDuke UniversityDurhamU.S.A
  4. 4.Microsoft Station QSanta BarbaraU.S.A
  5. 5.Institut für Theoretische PhysikHannoverGermany
  6. 6.School of Computer ScienceMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  7. 7.Perimeter Institute for Theoretical PhysicsWaterlooCanada