Skip to main content
Log in

Utility of dual X-ray absorptiometry and single X-ray absorptiometry as diagnostic tools for involutional osteoporosis

  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Consensus development conferences. Consensus statement of the World Congress on Osteoporosis. Who are candidates for prevention and treatment for osteoporosis? Amsterdam, Holland, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Genant HK, Engelke K, Fuerst T, et al. Noninvasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: state of the art. J Bone Miner Res 1996;11:707–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Miller PD, Bonnick SL, Rosen CJ. Consensus of an international panel on the clinical utility of bone mass measurements in the detection of low bone mass in the adult population. Calcif Tissue Int 1996;58:207–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mazess RB. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the manage-ment of bone disease. Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am 1995;6:507–37.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kin K, Kushida K, Yamazaki K, et al. Bone mineral density of the spine in normal Japanese subjects using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Calcif Tissue Int 1991;49:101–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Okamoto S, Kushida K, Yamazaki K, et al. Bone mineral density of the spine in normal Japanese subjects (2nd report) [in Japanese]. J Bone Miner Metab 1993;11:181–5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ohmura A, Kushida K, Yamazaki K, et al. Bone mineral density and body composition in Japanese women. Calcif Tissue Int 1997;in press.

  8. Yu W, Gluer CC, Fuerst T, et al. Influence of degenerative joint disease on spine bone mineral measurements in postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 1995;57:169–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. von der Recke P, Hansen MA, Overgaard K, Christiansen C. The impact of degenerative conditions in the spine on bone mineral density and fracture risk prediction. Osteoporos Int 1996;6:43–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kroger H, Huopio J, Honkanen R, et al. Prediction of fracture risk using axial bone mineral density in a perimenopausal population: a prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:302–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cummings SR, Black D. Bone mass measurements and risk of fractures in Caucasian women: a review of findings from prospective studies. Am J Med 1995;98:S 24–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kanis JA, Melton LJ, Christiansen C, Johnston CC, Khaltaev N. Perspective: the diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 1994;9:1137–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Report of a WHO study group. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. WHO technical report series 843. Geneva: WHO, 1994.

  14. Orimo H, Sugioka Y, Gorai I, et al. Diagnostic criteria of primary osteoporosis [in Japanese]. J Bone Miner Metab 1995;13:113–8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fukunaga H. Cut off values for diagnosis of osteoporosis in bone densitometry [in Japanese]. J Bone Miner Metab 1996;14:101–3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Inoue, T., Yamazaki, K. & Kushida, K. Utility of dual X-ray absorptiometry and single X-ray absorptiometry as diagnostic tools for involutional osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 7 (Suppl 3), 117–119 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03194356

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03194356

Keywords

Navigation