Australasian Physics & Engineering Sciences in Medicine

, 27:148

Comparison of computer display monitors for computed radiography diagnostic application in a radiology PACS

Authors

    • PACS Support Office, Radiology DepartmentPrincess Alexandra Hospital
  • K. Manthey
    • PACS Support Office, Radiology DepartmentPrincess Alexandra Hospital
  • P. Esdaile
    • PACS Support Office, Radiology DepartmentPrincess Alexandra Hospital
  • M. Benson
    • PACS Support Office, Radiology DepartmentPrincess Alexandra Hospital
Scientific Note

DOI: 10.1007/BF03178674

Cite this article as:
Sim, L., Manthey, K., Esdaile, P. et al. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med (2004) 27: 148. doi:10.1007/BF03178674

Abstract

A study to compare the performance of the following display monitors for application as PACS CR diagnostic workstations is described. 1. Diagnostic quality, 3 megapixel, 21 inch monochrome LCD monitors. 2. Commercial grade, 2 megapixel, 20 inch colour LCD monitors. Two sets of fifty radiological studies each were presented separately to five radiologists on two occasions, using different displays on each occasion. The two sets of radiological studies were CR of the chest, querying the presence of pneumothorax, and CR of the wrist, querying the presence of a scaphoid fracture. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed for diagnostic performance for each presentation. Areas under the ROC curves (AUC) for diagnosis using different monitors were compared for each image set and the following results obtained: Set 1: Monochrome AUC=0.873 +/- 0.026; Colour AUC=0.831 +/-0.032; Set 2: Monochrome AUC=0.945 +/- 0.014; Colour AUC=0.931 +/- 0.019; Differences in AUC were attributed to the different monitors. While not significant at a 95% confidence level, the results have supported a cautious approach to consideration of the use of commercial grade LCD colour monitors for diagnostic application.

Key words

PACSCRDiagnostic monitorreceiveroperating characteristic

Copyright information

© Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine 2004