Part 3: Advanced course of ontological engineering
- Riichiro Mizoguchi
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This article deals with advanced topics of ontological engineering to convince readers ontology is more than a rule base of terminological problems and is worth to consider a promising methodology in the next generation knowledge processing research. Needless to say, ontology in AI is tightly connected to ontology in philosophy. The first topic here is on philosophical issues which are very important to properly understand what an ontology is. After defining class, instance andis-a relation, we point out some typical inappropriate uses ofis-a relation in existing ontologies and analyze the reasons why. Other topics are basic ontological distinction, part-of relation, and so on. As an advanced example of ontology, an ontology of representation is extensively discussed. To conclude this tutorial, a success story of ontological engineering is presented. It is concerned with a new kind of application of ontology, that is, knowledge systematization. An ontology-based framework for functional knowledge sharing has been deployed into a company for two years and has been a great success. Finally, future of ontological engineering is discussed followed by concluding remarks.
- Guarino, N. and Welty, C., “Evaluating Ontological Decisions with OntoClean,”Communications of the ACM, 2, 45, pp. 61–65, 2002.
- Guarino, N., “Some Ontological Principles for Designing Upper Level Lexical Resources,” inProc. of First International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, ELRA — European Language Resources Association, pp. 527–534, Granada, Spain, 1998.
- Chandrasekaran, B. and Josephson, J. r., “Function in Device Representation,”Engineering with Computers, 16, 3/4, pp. 162–177, 2000. CrossRef
- Hubka, V., Eder, W. E.,Theory of Technical Systems, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1998.
- Hubka, V., Eder, W. E., “Functions Revisited,” inProc. of ICED 01, 2001.
- Kitamura, Y., Sano, T., Namba, K. and Mizoguchi, R., “A Functional Concept Ontology and Its Application to Automatic Identification of Functional Structures,”Advanced Engineering Informatics, 16, 2, pp. 145–163, 2002. CrossRef
- Kitamura, Y. and Mizoguchi, R., “Ontology-based Description of Functional Design Knowledge and Its Use in a Functional Way Server,”Expert Systems with Application, 24, 2, pp. 153–166, 2003. CrossRef
- Mizoguchi, R. and Kitamura, Y., “Foundation of Knowledge Systematization: Role of Ontological Engineering,”Industrial Knowledge Management — A Micro Level Approach (Rajkumar R. ed.), Ch. 1, pp. 17–36, Springer-Verlag, 2000.
- Pahl, G. and Beitz, W.,Engineering Design — A Systematic Approach, The Design Council, 1988.
- Winston, M. E., Chaffin, R. and Herrmann, D., “A Taxonomy of Part-whole Relations,”Cognitive Science, 11, pp. 417–444, 1987. CrossRef
- Part 3: Advanced course of ontological engineering
New Generation Computing
Volume 22, Issue 2 , pp 193-220
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. The Institute of Scientific and Industrial Research, Osaka University, 8-1 Mihogaoka, 567-0047, Ibaraki, Osaka, Japan