Abstract
The paper challenges the view that the late twentieth century is the ‘age of migration’. For developing countries, flows of out-migrants are small compared with population growth, although in developed countries the stock of immigrants increased in proportion to the total population between 1965 and 1990. Despite the importance of refugee movement, the main force for international migration is economic. Why do not more people migrate (internally and internationally) to take advantage of potential economic gains? For international migration, one deterrent is institutional barriers against uncontrolled immigration. Different interest groups stand to gain or lose from increased migration. The income-enhancing effects of unhindered international labour migration, measured jointly for sending and receiving countries and by extension globally, should be very large. Even partial liberalization of immigration to industrialized countries would serve developing countries well. In industrialized countries, however, there is concern about the effect of massive labour inflows on the ethnic, religious and cultural composition of the population and its social cohesion. In some countries, migration is leading to greater ethnic mingling; in others there is a recrudescence of nationalistic aspirations for independent statehood with ethnically homogeneous populations, or to preserve the advantages of economically successful subregions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boniface, Pascal. 1998. The proliferation of states.Washington Quarterly 21(3): 111–127.
Brzezinski, Zbigniew. 1983.Power and Principle: Memoirs of the National Security Adviser 1977–1981. New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux.
Castles, Stephen and Mark J. Miller. 1996.The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World. London: Macmillan.
Franklin, Benjamin. 1985 [1755]. Observations concerning the Increase of Mankind and the Peopling of Countries. First published 1755. Reprinted 1985 inArchives, Population and Development Review 11(1): 107–112.
Hamilton, Bob and John Whalley. 1984. Efficiency and distributional implications of global restrictions on labour mobility.Journal of Development Economics 14: 61–75.
Jefferson, Thomas. 1993 [1785]. Notes on the State of Virginia. First published 1785. Chapter on population reprinted 1993 inArchives, Population and Development Review 19(1): 175–180.
Kennan, George F. 1993.Around the Cragged Hill: A Personal and Political Philosophy. New York: W.W. Norton.
McNeill, William H. 1984. Human migration in historical perspective.Population and Development Review 10(1): 1–18.
Moynihan, Daniel Patrick. 1993.Pandaemonium. New York: Oxford University Press.
Simon, Julian. 1990.The Economic Consequences of Immigration. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.
United Nations. 1997.The World Social Report. New York.
United Nations. 2001.World Population Prospects: The 2000 Revision. New York.
United Nations. High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). 1995.The State of the World’s Refugees: In Search of Solutions. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zlotnik, Hania. 1998. International migration 1965–96: an overview.Population and Development Review 24(3): 429–468.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Demeny, P. Prospects for international migration: Globalization and its discontents. Journal of Population Research 19, 65–74 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031969
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031969