Skip to main content
Log in

An overall assessment of Life Cycle Inventory quality

Application to the production of polyethylene bottles

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A qualitative, quantitative, and overall quality assessment of life cycle inventory is suggested. The method is composed of five indicators which are set up at three levels of the inventory quality: flows, processes, and the system. The method allows one to assess the reliability of the method generating inventory data (justness of data, completeness of data, representativity of processes, repeatability of system definition) and at the same time to quantify the uncertainty of the resulting data made under the data generation method. LCA practitioners can finally decide the overall inventory quality through the information for the acceptability of the inventory result comparing the objective of quality and the cost necessary to improve the quality. The operation of the method was verified in the application to the production of polyethylene bottles. The proposed method was also found applicable for the validation of data in the ISO’s LCA data documentation format.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AFNOR (1994): Vocabulaire international des termes fondamentaux et généraux de métrologie. NF X 07–001. Association Franchise de Normalisation

  • Blanc I, Labouze E (1999): Analyse du cycle de vie-Evaluation de la qualité des données. Techniques de l’ingénieur, Vol G1 (G5750), 9 pp

  • Boustead I (1993): Eco-profiles of the European plastics industry, Report 3: Polyethylene and Polypropylene. Brussels (Belgium), European Center for Plastics in the Environment (PWMI), 20 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier J-L, Le Téno J-F (1996): Life cycle analysis with ill-defined data and its application to building products. Int J LCA 1 (2) 90–96

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coulon R, Camobreco V, Teulon H, Besnainou J (1997): Data quality and uncertainty in LCI. Int J LCA 2 (3) 178–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtier J-C (1994): Vocabulaire de la mesure. Techniques de l’ingenieur, Vol R11 (R113), 14 pp

  • Habersatter K (1990): Cahier de l’environnement n° 132: Bilan écologique des matériaux d’emballage, état en 1990. Bern (Swiss), BUWAL, 262 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Heijungs R (1996): Identification of key issues for further investigation in improving the reliability of life-cycle assessments. J Cleaner Prod 4 (3–4) 159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huijbregts MAJ (1998): Application of uncertainty and variability in LCA, Part I – A general framework for the analysis of uncertainty and variability in life cycle assessment. Int J LCA 3 (5) 273–280

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (1992): Principes généraux concernant les grandeurs, les unités et les symboles. ISO 31/0. International Standard Organization

  • ISO (1997): Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – General Principles and Framework. ISO 14040. International Standard Organization

  • ISO (1998): Environmental Management- Life Cycle Assessment – Goal and Scope Definition – Inventory Analysis. ISO 14041. International Standard Organization

  • ISO (2000): Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – LCA data documentation format. ISO/CD 14048. International Standard Organization

  • Kennedy DJ, Montgomery DC, Rollier DA, Keats JB (1997): Assessing input data uncertainty in life cycle inventory models. Int J LCA 2 (4) 229–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labouze E, Roederer O (1996): A suggested rating system to assess the data quality in your LCA study. 6th annual meeting of SETAC-Europe, Giardini Naxos Taormina, Italy

  • Maurice B, Frischknecht R, Coelho-Schwirtz V, Hungerbühlcr K (2000): Uncertainty analysis in life cycle inventory – Application to the production of electricity with French coal power plants. J Cleaner Prod 8, 95–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RECORD (1998): Evaluation de la qualité des données d’inventaires des ACV. Lyon(Fr), 2 Vols, 45 pp and 76 pp. Report for Association RE.CO.R.D n° 96-1002/1A, -1003/1A

  • Rousseaux P (1993): Evaluation comparative de l’impact environnemental global (ECIEG) du cycle des produits. Thesis, Gestion et traitement du déchet: INSA de Lyon, 1993, 276 pp

  • SETAC (1994): Life-cycle assessment data quality – A conceptual framework. Florida (USA). Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 157 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen B (1997): On uncertainty and sensitivity of LCA-based priority setting. J Cleaner Prod 5 (4) 255–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weidema BP, Wesnaes MS (1996): Data quality management for life cycle inventories – An example of using data quality indicators. J Cleaner Prod 4 (3–4) 167–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrisberg N, Lindeijer E, Mulders P, RAM A, Van der Ven B, Van der Wel H (1997): A semi-quantitative approach for assessing data quality in LCA. 7th annual meeting of SETAC-Europe, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Rousseaux.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rousseaux, P., Labouze, E., Suh, Y.J. et al. An overall assessment of Life Cycle Inventory quality. Int J LCA 6, 299–306 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978792

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978792

Keywords

Navigation