Skip to main content
Log in

Modelling of facilities for head injuries in London

  • Published:
Operational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract:

This paper is part of a greater effort of the London Severe Injury Working Group that is aiming to the improvement of care, treatment and transfer of severely injured patients. The problem we address in this paper emanates from the Location Set Covering Problem literature. We sought to position the minimum number of trauma centers within a network of existing hospitals and minimize the total traveling time of patients, from the place of injury to the hospital of final treatment in such a way that everyone in the entire population of London can reach a trauma center within acceptable time limits. A mathematical programming approach has been adopted in order to solve the problem. The created model proved very useful in enlightening the problem and providing a set of solutions easily understandable by all parts involved in the final decision. The proposed configuration of the trauma centers was provided to the London Severe Injury Working Group for subsequent decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson I.D., Woodford M., De Dombal F.T., Irving M. (1988). Retrospective study of 1000 deaths from injury in England and Wales. British Medical Journal 296:1305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardi M., Mortagy A. and Alsayed A. (1998). A multi-objective model for locating fire stations. European Journal of Operations Research vol. 110, 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. and Wolfe, P. (1958), “A warehouse-location problem” Operations Research,6, pp. 252–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman O., Drezner Z. and Wesolowsky G.O. (2001). Location of facilities on a network with groups of demand points. IIE Transactions vol. 33(8), 637–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branas Ch. and ReVelle Ch. (2001). An iterative switching heuristic to locate hospitals and helicopters. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences vol. 35, 11–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandeau M. and Larson R. (1986). Extending and applying the hypercube queing model to deploy ambulances in Boston. TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences vol. 22, 121–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brimberg J., Juel H. and Schobel A. (2002). Linear Facility Location in Three Dimensions — Models and Solution Methods. Operations Research vol. 50(6), 1050–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronk J., Howell D., Saints K. and Krieger H.A. (1986). Positioning of emergency facilities in an obstructed traffic grid. Mathematical Modelling vol. 7(4), 611–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton D., Daskin M., Simmons D., Bulloch B. and Jasma G. (1985). Determining emergency vehicle deployment in Austin Texas. Interfaces vol. 15, 96–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, R. L., McGinnis L.F. and White J.A. (1992). Facility Layout and Location: an Analytical Approach. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

  • Galvao R. and ReVelle Ch. (1996). A Lagragean heuristic for the maximal covering location problem. European Journal of Operations Research vol. 88(1), 114–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman A., Manbeck K., Ricks B. and Solow A.E. (1986). Emergency facilities location. Mathematical Modelling vol. 7(4), 603–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt R.L. (2002). Siting a fire station by leveraging soft constraints and supporting science. Interfaces vol. 32(4), 69–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laporte G., Gourdin E. and Labbe M. (2000) The Uncapacitated Facility Location Problem with Client Matching, Operations Research vol. 48(5), 671–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin Y. and Ben-Israel A. (2004). A heuristic method for large-scale multi-facility location problems. Computers & Operations Research vol. 31, 257–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • London Severe Injury Working Group (2001). Modernizing Trauma Services in London. Report and Recommendations.

  • Marianov V. and ReVelle Ch. (1995). Siting Emergency Services in Facility Location: A Survey of Applications and Methods, (Drezner Z., Ed.). Springer-Verlag, New York, 199–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melkote S. and Daskin M.S. (2001). Capacitated facility location/network design problems. European Journal of Operational Research vol. 129(3), 481–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirchandani, P. B., Francis R. L. (ed.). (1990). Discrete Location Theory. J.Wiley & Sons, New York.

  • Moore G.C. and ReVelle Ch. (1982). The hierarchical service location problem. Management Science vol. 28(7), 775–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • ReVelle Ch. (1997). A Perspective on Location Science. Location Science, vol. 5(1), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ReVelle, C. & Marianov, V. (1991). A probabilistic FLEET model with individual vehicle reliability requirements. European Journal of Operational Research vol. 53, 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilling D., Elzinga D.J., Cohon J., Church R. and ReVelle C. (1979). The Team/Fleet models for simultaneous facility and equipment siting. Transportation Science vol. 13(2), 163–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toregas C., Swain R., ReVelle C. and Bergman L. (1971). The location of emergency service facilities. Operations Research vol. 19, 1363–1373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, A. (1909). Über den Standort der Industrien. Teil 1: Reine Theorie des Standorts, VerlagJ.C.B. Mohr, Tübingen, Germany.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Georgia Skintzi, George Ioannou, Gregory P. Prastacos or Tim Coats.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Skintzi, G., Ioannou, G., Prastacos, G.P. et al. Modelling of facilities for head injuries in London. Oper Res Int J 3, 197–212 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02936401

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02936401

Keywords

Navigation