Skip to main content
Log in

Productivity and nutrient uptake of water hyacinth,Eichhornia crassipes I. Effect of nitrogen source

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water hyacinth,Eichhornia crassipes, growth and nutrient uptake rates, as influenced by different N sources and N transformations, were measured using microcosm aquaculture systems. Net productivity was highest in the system receiving equal amounts of NH4 + and NO3 - (at 10 mg N 1-1 each) and decreased in the order of NO3 -, NH4 +, urea (added at 20 mg N 1-1 each), and methane digestor effluent (at 6 mg N 1-1). During the first 7-wk study (average ambient air temperature was 26–28°C), biomass yields were in the range of 19–53 g dry wt m-2 day-1, while between the 8th and 12th wk (average ambient air temperature was 16–22°C), biomass yields were in the range of 10–33 g dry wt m-2 day-1. In the systems with either NH4 + or NO3 -, or both added in equal proportions, about 14–20% of the total yield was contributed by roots, whereas in the system with urea and digestor effluent, roots contributed about 23 and 44% of the total yield, respectively. Nitrogen and P uptake per unit area followed trends similar to biomass yields. Nitrogen uptake rates were in the range of 533–2, 161 mg N m-2 day-1 for the systems receiving NH4 +, NO3 -, and urea, while uptake rates were in the range of 124–602 mg N m-2 day-1 for the system receiving methane digestor effluent. Phosphorus uptake rates were found to be in the range of 59–542 mg P m-2 day-1. Under the most favorable conditions, maximum recorded biomass yield was 53 g dry wt m-2 day-1, with N and P removal rate of 2,161 mg N m-2 day-1 and 542 mg P m-2 day-1, indicating the potential of water hyacinth to produce large amounts of biomass which can be potentially used as a feedstock to produce methane.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • A.P.H.A. 1971. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 13th ed. Amer. Publ. Health Assoc, Washington, DC.

  • Boyd, C. E. 1970. Vascular aquatic plants for mineral nutrient removal from polluted waters. Econ. Bot. 24: 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremner, J. M. 1965. Inorganic forms of nitrogen.In C. A. Black, Methods of Soil Analysis. Agron. 9: 1179–1237. Amer. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.

  • Ornes, W. H., and D. L. Sutton. 1975. Removal of phosphorus from static sewage effluent by water hyacinths. Hyacinth Control 13: 56–58.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, K. R. 1983. Fate of nitrogen and phosphorus in a wastewater retention reservoir containing aquatic macrophytes. J. Environ. Qual. 12: (in press).

  • —, and L. O. Bagnall. 1981. Biomass production of aquatic plants used in agricultural drainage water treatment.In International Gas Res. Conf. Proc. Govt. Inst., Rockville, MD p. 668–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, P.D. Sacco, D.A. Graetz, K.L. Campbell, and L.R. Sinclair. 1982. Water treatment by an aquatic ecosystem: Efficiency of nutrient removal by reservoirs and flooded fields. Environ. Mgmt. 6: 261–271.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, H. H., and D.E. Davis. 1972. Nutrient removal by water hyacinths. Weed Sci. 20: 423–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryther, J. H., L.D. Williams, M.D. Hanisak, R.W. Stenberg, and T.A. DeBusk. 1978. Biomass production by some marine and freshwater plants.In W. W. Shuster, Proc. Second Fuels from Biomass Symp., Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst., Troy, NY 2: 978–989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiralipour, A., L.A. Garrard, and W.T. Haller. 1981. Nitrogen source, biomass production, and phosphorus uptake in water hyacinths. Aquatic Pl. Mgt. 19: 40–43.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, C. S. 1981. The effect of ionic form and level of nitrogen on the growth and composition ofEichhornia crassipes (Mart) Solms. Hydrobiologia (in press).

  • Wolverton, B. C, and R.C. McDonald. 1979. Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) productivity and harvesting studies. Econ. Bot. 33: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yount, J. L., and R. Crossman. 1970. Eutrophication control by plant harvesting. J. Water Poll. Cont. Fed. 42: 173–183.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Florida Agricultural Experiment Stations Journal Series No. 4165.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reddy, K.R., Tucker, J.C. Productivity and nutrient uptake of water hyacinth,Eichhornia crassipes I. Effect of nitrogen source. Econ Bot 37, 237–247 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858790

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858790

Keywords

Navigation