Coping with intractable controversies: The case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Intractable controversies and other types of policy disagreements correspond to policy problems with a different structure. The more structured a problem is, the more consensus there is about which values and information are at stake in the process of problem solving. Policymakers like to treat problems in as structured a way as possible. Three policy strategies are described to move away from the unstructured to the more structured problem type. However, policymakers run the risk of oversimplifying an ill-structured problem, which means that elements of the problem situation relevant to other actors are overlooked or denied. Hence, policy controversies may become intractable. The remedy is a fourth strategy, characterised by problem structuring. This strategy requires political participation of actors with different views on the problem, and an argued political problem choice.
- Ackoff, R.L. (1974).Redesigning the future. New York: Wiley.
- Anderson, Ch.W. (1987). Political philosophy, practical reason, and policy analysis. In: F. Fischer and J. Forester (Eds.),Confronting values in policy analysis: The politics of criteria. Newbury Park: Sage.
- Arendt, H. (1968).Between past and future: Eight exercises in political thought. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
- Bachrach, P. and M.S. Baratz (1970).Power and poverty: Theory and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Bacon, L.S. and Milkey, J.R. (1982). Overcoming local opposition to hazardous waste facilities; the Massachusetts approach.Harvard Environmental Law Review 6: 265–305.
- Beck, U. (1992).Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
- Caplan, N., A. Morrison, and Stambaugh, R.J. (1975).The use of social science knowledge in policy decisions at the national level: A report to respondents. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
- Cobb, R.W. and Elder, C.D. (1983).Participation in American politics: The dynamics of agenda building. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Dahl, R.A. (1985).Nuclear weapons: Democracy versus guardianship. Syracuse: SUNY Press.
- Dery, D. (1984).Problem definition in policy analysis. Lawrence: Kansas University Press.
- Diesing, P. (1962).Reason in society: Five types of decisions and their social conditions. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
- Douglas, M., and Wildavsky, A. (1982).Risk and culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Dryzek, J.S. (1990).Discursive democracy: Politics, policy, and political science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Dunn, W.N. (1981).Public policy analysis. An introduction. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall
- Dunn, W.N. (1988). Methods of the second type: Coping with the wilderness of conventional policy analysis.Policy Studies Review 7: 720–737. CrossRef
- Fischer, F. (1980).Politics, values, and public policy. The problem of methodology. Boulder: Westview Press.
- Fischer, F. (1990).Technocracy and the politics of expertise. Newbury Park: Sage.
- Fischer, F. (1995).Evaluating public policy. Chicago: Nelson Hall.
- Hawkesworth, M.E. (1988).Theoretical issues in policy analysis. Albany: SUNY Press.
- Hisschemöller, M. and Midden, C.J.H. (1989). Technological risk, policy theories and public perception in connection with the siting of hazardous facilities. In: C. Vlek and G. Cvetkovich (Eds.),Social decision methodology for technological projects. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
- Hisschemöller, M. (1993).De Democratie van Problemen. De Relatie Tusen de Inhoud van Beleidsproblemen en Methoden van Politieke Besluitvorming. Amsterdam: Free University Press.
- Hodgkinson, C. (1978).Towards a philosophy of administration. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
- Hogwood B.W. and Gunn, L.A. (1986).Policy analysis for the real world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hoppe, R. (1989).Het Beleidsprobleem Geproblematiseerd: Over Beleid Ontwerpen en Probleemvorming. Muiderberg: Coutinho.
- Hoppe, R. and A. Peterse (1993).Handling frozen fire: Political culture and risk management. Boulder: Westview Press.
- Kimball, A.W. (1957). Errors of the third kind in statistical consulting.Journal of the American Statistical Association 52: 133–142. CrossRef
- Lasswell, H.D. (1951). The policy orientation. In: D. Lerner and H.D. Lasswell (Eds.),The policy sciences. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Lijphart, A. (1968).The politics of accommodation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Lindblom, C.E. and D.K. Cohen (1979).Usable knowledge: Social science and social problem solving. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- Lowi, Th. (1972). Four systems of policy, politics and choice.Public Administration Review 32: 298–310. CrossRef
- MacRae, D. (1976).The social function of social science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- Mason, R.O. and I.I. Mitroff (1981).Challenging strategic planning assumptions. Theory, cases, and techniques. New York: Wiley.
- Meer, M, van der (1995). Mest, Natuur en het Ministerie van Landbouw. Een Politicologische Analyse van het Beleid met Behulp van de Theorie van M. Hisschemöller. Unpublished master’s thesis. University of Amsterdam.
- Mitroff, I.I., R.O. Mason and V.P. Barabba (1983).The 1980 census: Policy-making amid turbulence. Lexington: Heath
- Myrdal, G. (1944).An American dilemma. The negro problem and modern democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
- Olson, M. (1971).The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
- Paris, D.C., and J.F. Reynolds (1983).The logic of policy inquiry. New York: Longman.
- Piller, C. (1991).The fail-safe society: Community defiance and the end of American technological optimism. New York: Basic Books.
- Portney, K.E. (1985). The potential of the theory of compensation for mitigating public opposition to hazardous waste treatment facility siting: Some evidence from five Massachusetts’ communities.Policy Studies Journal 14: 81–89. CrossRef
- Raiffa, H. (1968).Decision analysis: Introductory lectures on choices under uncertainty. Reading: Addison Wesley.
- Rittel, H.W.J. and M.M. Webber (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning.Policy Sciences 4: 155–169. CrossRef
- Roe, E. (1990).Narrative policy analysis. Theory and procedure. Durham: Duke University Press.
- Sabatier, P. and H.C. Jenkins-Smith (Eds.) (1993).Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder: Westview Press.
- Schattschneider, E.E. (1960).The semisovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
- Schmitter, P.C. (1979). Still the century of corporatism? In: P.C. Schmitter and G. Lehmbruch (Eds.),Trends Towards Corporatist Intermediation. London: Sage.
- Schön, D. and M. Rein (1994).Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.
- Simon, H.A. (1973). The structure of ill-structured problems.Artificial Intelligence 4: 181–201. CrossRef
- Stone, D.A. (1988).Policy paradox and political reason. Chicago: Scott, Foresman.
- Thompson, J.D. and A. Tuden (1959). Strategies, structures and processes of organizational decision. In: J.D. Thompson et al. (Eds.),Comparative Studies in Administration. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
- Weiss, C.H. (1980). Knowledge creep and decision accretion.Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 1: 381–404.
- Coping with intractable controversies: The case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis
Knowledge and Policy
Volume 8, Issue 4 , pp 40-60
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links