Skip to main content
Log in

Third party roles in intimate partner violence incidents and their effects on police response in a statewide rural jurisdiction

  • Published:
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using police narratives and affidavits, as well as incident report forms, this paper examines the neglected research topic of third party involvement in intimate partner violence and reports findings that differ from previous research done on the subject as a secondary topic. After identifying two analytically distinct roles of third parties, those of complainant and eyewitness, the study finds that the presence of complainants and eyewitnesses alone has no effect on police arrest dispositions. However, arrest is increased significantly when eyewitnesses become complainants or provide sworn statements. Other mafor findings of the study were: (1) the importance of the heretofore disregarded role of family members as third party witnesses; (2) the relative insignificance of marital status among cohabiting victim-offender couples on reporting and disposition; (3) the relatively small percentage of witnesses who are victimized; and (4) the greater willingness of witnesses to provide sworn statements against offenders with past versus current relationships to the victim.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin, T., & Buzawa, E. (1993). Determining police responses to domestic violence victims: The role of victim preference.Am. Beh. Scientist 36, 610–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, R., & Coker, A.L. (1995). Police involvement in domestic violence: The interactive effects of victim injury, offender's history of violence, and race.Violence and Victims 10, 96–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, R., Berk, S., Newton, P., & Loseke, D. (1984). Cops on call: Summoning the police to the scene of spousal abuse.Law and Society Review 18, 479–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berk, R., & Loseke, D. (1980–1981). Handling family violence: Situational determinants of police arrest in domestic disturbances.Law and Society Review 15, 317–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan, D. (1992). Perceptions of bystander willingness to intervene on behalf of victims of assaults: Implications for the development of co-productive strategies.Criminal Justice Policy Review 6(1), 40–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzawa, E., & Buzawa, C. (1993). Opening the doors: The changing police response to domestic violence. In R. Dunham, R. & Alpert, G. (Eds.),Critical issues in policing (2nd ed., pp. 551–567). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzawa, E., & Buzawa, C. (2001). Traditional and innovative police responses to domestic violence. In Dunham, R., & Alpert, G. (Eds.),Critical issues in policing (4th ed., pp. 216–237). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzawa, E., Hotaling, G., Klein, A., & Byrne, J. (1999).Response to domestic violence in a proactive court setting: Final report. National Institute of Justice of the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felson, R., & Ackerman, J. (2001). Arrests for domestic and other assaults.Criminology 39, 655–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felson, R., Messner, S., & Hoskin, A. (1999). The victim-offender relationship and calling the police in assaults.Criminology 37 (4), 931–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoefnagels, C., & Zwikker, M. (2001). The bystander dilemma and child abuse: Extending the Latane and Darley model to domestic violence.Journal of Applied Social Psychology 31, 1158–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, C., & Sanders A. (2000). Police response to domestic violence: From victim choice to victim empowerment.British Journal of Criminology 40, 14–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, I., & Hirschel, J.D. (2001). Effects of children's presence on woman abuse.Violence and Victims 16, 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laner, M., Benin, M., & Ventrone, N. (2001). Bystander attitudes toward victims of violence: Who's worth helping?Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal 22, 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignon, S. & Holmes, W. (1995). Police response to mandatory arrest laws.Crime and Delinquency 41, 430–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Planty, M. (2002).Third-party involvement in violent crime, 1993–99 (NCJ 189100). Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report (July). 1–7.

  • Robinson, A., & Chandek, M. (2000) The domestic violence arrest decision: Examining demographic, attitudinal, and situational variables.Crime and Delinquency 43, 104–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalans, L. (1996). Family harmony or individual protection? Recommendations about how policy can handle domestic violence situations.Am. Beh. Scientist 39 (4), 433–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermont State Police. (1998)Vermont State Police rules and regulations, operational policies and procedures, Section V, Chapter 5, Article V111, 4.1 (A) (5).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper was presented at panel session on “Domestic Violence and Law Enforcement Interventions” at the 2004 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences in Las Vegas on March 11. The study was facilitated by a Norwich University Board of Fellows Award and a Norwich University Research Grant. I would like to express my appreciation to the Vermont Department of Public Safety and the Vermont Crime Information Center for providing access to the Vermont Incident-Based Reporting System and for their cooperation throughout the project.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shernock, S. Third party roles in intimate partner violence incidents and their effects on police response in a statewide rural jurisdiction. J Police Crim Psych 20, 22–39 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02806704

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02806704

Keywords

Navigation