Skip to main content
Log in

The aseity of God in St. Anselm

  • Published:
Sophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. The Latin text I have used for both theMonologion and theProslogion is from Jasper Hopkins and Herbert Richardson ed. and tr.,Anselm of Canterbury (London: SCM Press, 1974), vol. 1. All translations are my own.

    Google Scholar 

  2. I trace these difficulties with the notion ofcausa sui also in my “God as Self-Explanatory”,Philosophical Quarterly, 30 (1980), 210–211.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See, for example, Kant’sCritique of Pure Reason, tr. N.K. Smith (New York, St Martin’s Press, 1965), pp. 500–507; G. E. Moore, “Is Existence a Predicate?”,Proceedings of the Aristotelean Society, Supp. Vol. 15 (1936), 175–188; John Hick, “God as Necessary Being”,Journal of Philosophy, 57 (1960), 725–734; and myAnalogy and Talking About God (Washington: University Press of America, 1978), pp. 67–77.

  4. Anselm’sDe veritate in Schmitt edition ofOpera omnia, t., 1, pp. 188–90.

  5. SeeMonologion, The Latin text I have used for both theMonologion and theProslogion is from ch. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Monologion, The Latin text I have used for both theMonologion and theProslogion is from ch. 16 and 17Proslogion, ch. 18

    Google Scholar 

  7. Monologion, The Latin text I have used for both theMonologion and theProslogion is from ch. 22;Proslogion, ch. 22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morreall, J. The aseity of God in St. Anselm. SOPH 23, 35–44 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02780884

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02780884

Keywords

Navigation