Skip to main content
Log in

Theism and evil

  • Published:
Sophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Alvin Plantinga’sGod and Other Minds (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1967), ch. 6. Two recent defences of theism representing variations of the claim that evil is necessary to the greatest good are Nelson Pike, “Hume On Evil”,The Philosophical Review, Vol. LXXII, No. 2 (1963), reprinted in Pike (ed.),God and Evil (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1964). pp. 85–102; and John Hick,Evil and the God of Love (London: Macmillan, 1966), esp. pp 279–398.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sophia, Vol. VIII, No. 2 (July, 1969), pp. 18–28.

  3. “Evil and Omnipotence,”Mind, Vol. LXIV, No. 254 (1955), reprinted in in Pike (ed.),op. cit.,God and Evil (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1964), pp. 46–60.

  4. seeop. cit., pp. 279–398.

    Google Scholar 

  5. As Plantinga does;op. cit., pp. 149–51.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kane, G.S. Theism and evil. SOPH 9, 14–21 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02779107

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02779107

Keywords

Navigation