Abstract
Most previously published electromyographic (EMG) studies have indicated that the temporalis muscles in humans become almost electrically quiet during incisai biting. These data have led various workers to conclude that these muscles may contribute little to the incisai bite force. The feeding behavior and comparative anatomy of the incisors and temporalis muscles of certain catarrhine primates, however, suggest that the temporalis muscle is an important and powerful contributor to the bite force during incision. One purpose of this study is to analyze the EMG activity of the masseter and temporalis muscles in both humans and macaques with the intention of focusing on the conflict between published EMG data on humans and inferences of muscle function based on the comparative anatomy and behavior of catarrhine primates. The EMG data collected from humans in the present study indicate that, in five of seven subjects, the masseter,anterior temporalis, and posterior temporalis muscles are very active during apple incision (i.e., relative to EMG activity levels during apple and almond mastication). In the other two human subjects the EMG levels of these muscles are lower during incision than during mastication, but in no instance are these muscles ever close to becoming electrically quiet. The EMG data on macaques indicate that, in all six subjects, the masseter, anterior temporalis, and posterior temporalis muscles are very active during incision. These data are in general agreement with inferences on muscle function that have been drawn from the comparative anatomy and behavior of primates, but they do not agree with previous experimental data. The reason for this disagreement is probably due to differences in the experimental procedure. In previous studies subjects simply bit isometrically on their incisors and the resulting EMG pattern was compared to the pattern associated with powerful clenching in centric occlusion. In the present study the subjects incised into actual food objects, and the resulting EMG pattern was compared to the pattern associated with mastication of various foods. It is not surprising that these two procedures result in markedly different EMG patterns, which in turn result in markedly different interpretations of jaw-muscle function. In an attempt to explain the evolution of the postorbital septum in anthropoids, it has been suggested that the anterior temporalis is more active than the masseter during incision (Cachel, 1979). The human and macaque EMG data do not support this hypothesis; during incision, the two muscles show no consistent differences in humans and the masseter appears to be in fact more active than the anterior temporalis in macaques.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahlgren, J. (1966). Mechanism of mastication: A quantitative cinematographic and electromyographic study of masticatory movements in children, with special reference to occlusion of the teeth.Acta odontol. 24(Suppl. 44): 1–109.
Ahlgren, J., and Owall, B. (1970). Muscular activity and chewing force, a polygraphic study of human mandibular movements.Arch. Oral Biol. 15: 271–280.
Basmajian, J. V. (1978).Muscles Alive, 4th ed. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.
Cachel, S. (1979). A functional analysis of the primate masticatory system and the origin of the anthropoid post-orbital septum.Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 50: 1–18.
Cartmill, M. (1980). Morphology, function, and evolution of the anthropoid postorbital septum. In Ciochon, R.L., and Chiarelli, A.B. (ed.),Evolutionary Biology of New World Monkeys and Continental Drift, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 243–274.
Connolly, R., and Quimby, F. W. (1978). Acepromazine-ketamine anesthesia in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatto). Lab. Anim. Sci. 28(1): 72–74.
Gaspard, M. (1972).Les muscles masticateurs superficiels des Singes á l’Homme. Anatomie comparée et anatomo-physiologie, Librairie Maloine S. A. Editeur, Paris.
Gorniak, G. C., and Gans, C. (1980). Quantitative assay of electromyograms during mastication in domestic cats (Felis catus). J. Morphol. 163: 253–281.
Greenfield, B. E. and Wyke, B. D. (1956). Electromyographic studies of some of the muscles of mastication.Br. Dent. J. 100: 129–143.
Hannam, A. G., Inkster, W. C., and Scott, J. D. (1975). Peak electromyographic activity and jaw closing force in man.J. Dent. Res. 54: 694.
Hannam, A. G., DeCou, R. E., Scott, J. D., and Wood, W. W. (1977). The relationship between dental occlusion, muscle activity and associated jaw movement in man.Arch. Oral Biol. 22: 25–32.
Hylander, W. L. (1975a). The human mandible: Lever or link?Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 43: 227–242.
Hylander, W. L. (1975b). Incisor size and diet in anthropoids with special reference to Cercopithecidae.Science 189: 1095–1098.
Hylander, W. L. (1979). Mandibular function inGalago crassicaudalus andMacaca fascicularis: Anin vivo approach to stress analysis of the mandible.J. Morphol. 159: 253–296.
Hylander, W. L. (1983a). Mechanical properties of food and recruitment of masseter force.J. Dent. Res. 62: 297.
Hylander, W. L. (1983b). Posterior temporalis function in macaques and humans.Am. J. Phys. Anlhrop. 60: 208.
Hylander, W. L. (1984). Stress and strain in the mandibular svmphysis of primates: A test of competing hypotheses.Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 64: 1–46.
Jolly, C. J. (1970). The seed-eaters: A new model of hominid differentiation based on a baboon analogy.Man (N.S.) 5: 5–26.
Latif, A. (1957). An electromyographic study of the temporalis muscle in normal persons during selected positions and movements of the mandible.Am. J. Orthodont. 43: 577–591.
Luschei, E. A., and Goodwin, G. M. (1974). Patterns of mandibular movement and jaw muscle activity during mastication in the monkey.J. Neurophysiol. 37: 954–966.
MacDougall, J. D. B., and Andrew, B. L. (1953). An electromyographic study of the temporalis and masseter muscles.J. Anal. (Lond.) 87: 37–45.
Moller, E. (1966). The chewing apparatus: An electromyographic study of the action of the muscles of mastication and its correlation to facial morphology.Acta Physiol. Scand. 69 (Suppl. 280): 1–229.
Nie, N. H., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K., and Bent, D. H. (1975).SPSS Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Oxnard, C. E. (1980). The analysis of form: Without measurement and without computers.Am. Zool. 20: 695–705.
Oxnard, C. E. (1984).The Order of Man, Yale University Press, New Haven and London.
Schumacher, G. H. (1961).Funktionelle Morphologie der Kaumuskulatur, Gustav Fisher Verlag, Jena.
Stern, J. T., Wells, J. P., Jungers, W. L., Vangor, A. K., and Fleagle, J. G. (1980). An electromyographic study of the pectoralis major in atelines andHylobates, with special reference to the evolution of a pars clavicularis.Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 52: 13–25.
Smith, K. K. (1982). An electromyographic study of the function of the jaw adducting muscles inVaranus exanthematicus (Varanidae). J. Morphol. 173: 137–158.
Swindler, D. R., and Wood, C. D. (1973).An Atlas of Primate Gross Anatomy. Baboon, Chimpanzee, and Man, University of Washington, Press, Seattle and London.
Vitti, M., and Basmajian, J. V. (1977). Integrated actions of masticatory muscles: Simultaneous EMG from eight intramuscular electrodes.Anat. Rec. 187: 173–189.
Weijs, W. A., and Dantuma, R. (1975). Electromyography and mechanics of mastication in the albino rat.J. Morph. 146: 1–34.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hylander, W.L., Johnson, K.R. Temporalis and masseter muscle function during incision in macaques and humans. Int J Primatol 6, 289–322 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02745501
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02745501