Structural mobility and transformations in globular proteins
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Although globular proteins are endowed with well defined three-dimensional structures, they exhibit substantial mobility within the framework of the given three-dimensional structure. The different types of mobility found in proteins by and large correspond to the different levels of organisational hierarchy in protein architecture. They are of considerable structural and functional significance, and can be broadly classified into (a) thermal and conformational fluctuations, (b) segmental mobility, (c) interdomain mobility and (d) intersubunit mobility. Protein crystallographic studies has provided a wealth of information on all of them. The temperature factors derived from X-ray diffraction studies provide a measure of atomic displacements caused by thermal and conformational fluctuations. The variation of displacement along the polypeptide chain have provided functionally significant information on the flexibility of different regions of the molecule in proteins such as myoglobin, lysozyme and prealbumin. Segmental mobility often involves the movement of a region or a segment of a molecule with respect to the rest, as in the transition between the apo and the holo structures of lactate dehydrogenase. It may also involve rigidification of a disordered region of the molecule as in the activation of the zymogens of serine proteases. Transitions between the apo and the holo structures of alcohol dehydrogenase, and between the free and the sugar bound forms of hexokinase, are good examples of interdomain mobility caused by hinge-bending. The capability of different domains to move semi-independently contributes greatly to the versatility of immunoglobulin molecules. Interdomain mobility in citrate synthase appears to be more complex and its study has led to an alternative description of domain closure. The classical and the most thoroughly studied case of intersubunit mobility is that in haemoglobin. The stereochemical mechanism of the action of this allosteric protein clearly brings out the functional subtilities that could be achieved through intersubunit movements. In addition to ligand binding and activation, environmental changes also often cause structural transformations. The reversible transformation between 2 Zn insulin and 4 Zn insulin is caused by changes in the ionic strength of the medium. Adenylate Kinase provides a good example for functionally significant reversible conformational transitions induced by variation in pH. Available evidences indicate that reversible structural transformations in proteins could also be caused by changes in the aqueous environment, including those in the amount of water surrounding protein molecules.
Adams, M. J., Blundell, T. L., Dodson, E. J., Dodson, G. G., Vijayan, M, Baker, E. N., Harding, M. M., Hodgkin, D. G, Rimmer, B. and Sheat, S. (1969)Nature (London),224, 491.CrossRef
Amzel, L. M. and Poljack, R. (1979)J. Ann. Rev. Biochem.,48, 961.CrossRef
Artymiuk, P. J., Blake, C. C. F., Grace, D. E. P., Oatley, S. J., Phillips, D. C. and Sternberg, M. J. E. (1979)Nature (London),280, 563.CrossRef
Bentley, G., Dodson, E., Dodson, G., Hodgkin, D. and Mercola, D. (1976)Nature (London),261, 166.CrossRef
Blake, C. C. F. and Oatley, S. J. (1982) inConformation in Biology (eds. R. Srinivasan and R. H. Sarma) (New York: Adenine Press), p. 29.
Bloomer, A. C, Champness, J. N., Bricogne, G., Staden, R. and Klug, A. (1978)Nature (London),276, 362.CrossRef
Blow, D. M. (1978) inMolecular Interactions and Activity in Proteins, Ciba Foundation Symposium-60 (New Ser.), (Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica and New York: North-Holland Inc.) p. 55.
Blundell, T. L., Cutfield, J. F., Cutfield, S. M., Dodson, E. J., Dodson, G. G., Hodgkin, D. C, Mercola, D. A. and Vijayan, M. (1971)Nature (London),231, 506.CrossRef
Blundell, T., Lindley, P., Miller, L., Moss, D., Slingsby, C., Tickle, I., Turnell, B. and Wistow, B. (1981)Nature (London),289, 771.CrossRef
Boyes-Watson, J., Davidson, E. and Perutz, M. F. (1947)Proc. R. Soc. (London),A191, 83.
Bragg, L. and Perutz, M. F. (1952)Proc. R. Soc. (London),A213, 425.
Branden, C. I., Jornvall, H, Eklund, H. and Furugren, B. (1975) inThe Enzymes (ed. P. D. Boyer) 3rd edition, Vol. 11, p. 103.
Careri, G., Grotton, E., Yong, P. H. and Rupley, J. A. (1980)Nature (London),284, 572.CrossRef
Dijkstra, B. W., VanNes, G. J. H., Kalk, K. H., Brandenburg, N. P., Hol, W. G. J. and Drenth, J. (1982)Acta Crystallogr.,B38, 793.
Drenth, J., Jansonius, N., Koekoek, R., Swen, H. and Wolthers, B. (1968)Nature (London),218, 929.CrossRef
Frauenfelder, H., Petsko, G. A. and Tsernoglou, D. (1979)Nature (London),280, 558.CrossRef
Gurd, F. R. N. and Rothgeb, T. M. (1979)Adv. Protein Chem.,33, 73.PubMed
Holbrook, J. J., Liljas, A., Steindel, S. J. and Rossmann, M. G. (1975) inThe Enzymes (ed. P. D. Boyer) 3rd edition, Vol. 11, p. 191.
Huber, R. and Bode, W. (1978)Acc. Chem. Res.,11, 114.CrossRef
Huxley, H. E. and Kendrew, J. C. (1953)Acta Crystallogr. 6, 76.CrossRef
Kassiakoff, A. A. (1982)Nature (London),296, 713.CrossRef
Kuntz, Jr. I. D. and Kauzmann, W. (1974)Adv. Protein Chem.,28, 239.PubMed
McCammon, J. A. and Karplus, M. (1983)Acc. Chem. Res. 16, 187.CrossRef
Monod, J., Wyman, J. and Changeux, J. F. (1965)J. Mol. Biol.,12, 88.PubMed
Northrup, S. H., Pear,.. R., McCammon, J. A., Karplus, M. and Takano, T. (1980)Nature (London),287, 659.CrossRef
Pai, E. F., Sachsenheimer, W., Schirmer, R. H. and Schulz, G. E. (1977)J. Mol. Biol.,144, 37.CrossRef
Perutz,.. F. (1970)Nature (London),228, 726.CrossRef
Perutz, M. F. (1980)Proc. R. Soc. (London),B208, 135.
Phillips, D. C. (1967)Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,57, 484.CrossRef
Quiocho, F. A. and Lipscomb, W. N. (1971)Adv. Protein Chem.,25, 1.PubMed
Remington, S., Weigand, G. and Huber, R. (1982)J. Mol. Biol.,158, 11.CrossRef
Ribeiro, A. A., King, R. and Jardetzky, O. (1982) inConformation in Biology (eds R. Srinivasan and R. H. Sarma) (New York: Adenine Press), p. 39.
Rossmann, M. G., Liljas, A., Branden, C. I. and Banaszak, L. J. (1975) inThe Enzymes, ed. P. D. Boyer, 3rd edition, Vol. 11, p. 61.
Rossmann, M. G., Moras, D. and Olsen, K. W. (1974)Nature (London),205, 194.CrossRef
Sachsenheimer, W. and Schulz, G. E. (1977)J. Mol. Biol.,144, 23.CrossRef
Salunke, D. M., Veerapandian, B. and Vijayan, M. (1984)Curr. Sci.,53, 231.
Schulz, G. E., Elzinga, M, Marx, F. and Schirmer, R. H. (1974)Nature (London),250, 120.CrossRef
Stubbs, G., Warren, S. and Holmes, K. (1977)Nature (London),267, 216.CrossRef
Wetlaufer, D. B. (1973)Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA),70, 697.CrossRef
Wuthrich, K. and Wagner, G. (1979)Trends Biochem. Sci.,3, 227.CrossRef
- Structural mobility and transformations in globular proteins
Journal of Biosciences
Volume 6, Issue 4 , pp 357-377
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer India
- Additional Links
- Globular proteins
- conformational mobility
- structural transformations
- protein crystallography