Skip to main content
Log in

A half-century of suffrage: New data and a comparative analysis

  • Research Forum
  • Published:
Studies in Comparative International Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Even though theories of democracy place emphasis on universal suffrage, little attempt has been made to measure the degree of suffrage in a broad range of countries. This article uses qualitative descriptions of suffrage to develop quantitative measures of suffrage for most countries of the world. We present annual suffrage measures from 1950 to 2000, provide basic descriptive statistics, and document trends in suffrage across the world. We also compare our measure of suffrage to two other measures available for 1968 and 1985.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvarez, Mike, Jose Antonio Cheibub, Fernando Limongi and Adam Przeworski. 1996. “Classifying Political Regimes.”Studies in Comparative International Development 31 (Summer): 3–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arat, Zehra F. 1991.Democracy and Human Rights in Developing Countries. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reiner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle, James L. 1995.AMOS 3.5. Chicago: Small Waters.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1996. “Full Information Estimation in the Presence of Incomplete Data.” Pp. 243–277 inAdvanced Structure Equation Modeling Issues and Techniques eds. George A. Marcoulides and Randall E. Schumacker. Mahway, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Harold K. and Donna L. Becker, eds. 1986.Handbook of the World’s Police. Metuchen, NJ: The Scarecrow Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, Kenneth A. 1980. “Issues in the Comparative Measurement of Political Democracy.”American Sociological Review 45: 370–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1998. “Cross-National Indicators of Liberal Democracy, 1950 to 1990.” Codebook. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, Kenneth A., Robert W. Jackman and Hyojoung Kim. 1997. “A Comparative Analysis of Suffrage, Registration, and Turnout.” University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Intelligence Agency. 1992–2000.The World Factbook. Washington, D.C.

  • Coppedge, Michael and Wolfgang Reinecke. 1988. “A Scale of Polyarchy.” Pp. 102–125 inFreedom in the World: Political Rights and Civil Liberties, 1987–1988, ed. Raymond D. Gastil. New York: Freedom House.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1990. “Measuring Polyarchy.”Studies in Comparative International Development 25, 1: 51–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutright, Phillips and James A. Wiley. 1969. “Modernization and Political Representation: 1927–1966.”Studies in Comparative International Development 5, 2: 24–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert A. 1971.Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1989.Democracy and its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L., J.J. Linz, and S.M. Lipset, eds. 1990.Politics in Developing Countries: Comparing Experiences with Democracy. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Europa World Yearbook 2000, vols. I and II. 2000. London: Europa Publications Limited.

  • Freedom House Survey Team. 1999.Freedom in the World: The Annual Survey of Political Rights and Civil Liberties, 1998–1999. New York: Freedom House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, Ted Robert. 1993.Minorities at Risk: A Global View of Ethnopolitical Conflicts. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadenius, Axel. 1992.Democracy and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, Donald Clark. 1999.The Literate Communist: 150 Years of the Communist Manifesto. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • The International Institute for Strategic Studies. 1990–1999.The Military Balance. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inter-Parliamentary Union. 1985–1999.Chronicle of Parliamentary Elections, Vols. 20–33. Geneva, Switzerland.

  • Jackman, Robert W. 1987. “Political Institutions and Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies.”American Political Science Review 81: 405–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keesing’s Contemporary Archives. Various years. London, England: Keesings Publications Ltd.

  • Lipset, Seymour M. 1959. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy.”American Political Science Review 53: 69–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metz, Helen Chapin, ed. 1992.Nigeria: A Country Study. Washington: Federal Research Division, Library of Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munck, Gerardo and Jay Verkuilen. 2002. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: Evaluating Alternative Indices.”Comparative Political Studies 35: 5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Harold D., ed. 1951–1975.The Stateman’s Yearbook. New York: St. Martins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Harold D. ed. 1981.South Africa, A Country Study. Washington, D.C.: American University, Foreign Area Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okin, Susan M. 1979.Women in Western Political Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Political Handbook of the World. Various years. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Przeworski, Adam, Michael E. Alvarez, Jose Antonio Cheibub, and Fernando Limongi. 2000.Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph. 1952.Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles L. and David A. Jodice. 1983.The World Handbook of Political and Social Indicators III: 1948–1977. Computer file.

  • UNESCO. 1990, 1999.Statistical Yearbook. Paris, France: UNESCO and Bernan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Various years.Demographic Yearbook. New York.

  • United Nations. 1993.Sex and Age Distribution of the World Populations: 1950–2025, The 1992 Revision. Computer file.

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Pamela Paxton is assistant professor of sociology at The Ohio State University. She has intersecting interests in political sociology, stratification, and methodology. Current projects include an investigation into the political consequences of prejudice against immigrants and research on the ideological determinants of women’s national legislative participation. Some of her recent articles have appeared in theAmerican Sociological Review, theAmerican Journal of Sociology, andStructural Equation Modeling.

Kenneth A. Bollen is director of the Odum Institute for Research in Social Science and Immerwahr Distinguished Professor of Sociology at the University of North Carolina (Chapel Hill). He has won the Lazarsfeld Award for Methodological Contributions. Bollen is the author ofStructural Equation Models with Latent Variables (John Wiley) and coeditor (with J. S. Long) ofTesting Structural Equation Models (Sage). Recent articles have appeared inSociological Methods & Research, Annual Review of Sociology, Annual Review of Psychology, Population Studies, andStructural Equation Modeling.

Deborah M. Lee is a Ph.D. student in the Department of Sociology at The Ohio State University. Her research interests include quantitative research methods and religion.

HyoJoung Kim is assistant professor of sociology at the University of Washington, Seattle. His current work focuses on modeling ideational diffusion in the context of resistance and theorizing the rational-emotional dynamics in social movements. Other work examines suicides as a form of collective action, exit and voice dynamics in East Germany and North Korea, and the democracy effects of economic development using time-series analysis.

We gratefully acknowledge the support of the Mershon Center at The Ohio State University, the National Science Foundation (SES-8908361 & SES-9121564), and the University of North Carolina Arts and Science Foundation. Please address all correspondence to Pamela Paxton, Department of Sociology, 300 Bricker Hall, 190 North Oval Mall, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210-1353 or email her at paxton.36@osu.edu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paxton, P., Bollen, K.A., Lee, D.M. et al. A half-century of suffrage: New data and a comparative analysis. St Comp Int Dev 38, 93–122 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686324

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686324

Keywords

Navigation