Abstract
It has been hypothesized that because public employee unions are politically influential, they have a bargaining advanatage over their private-sector counterparts. Previous studies, however, have not directly measured the political activities of public employee unions and have instead usually used some type of unionization proxy. This paper uses unpublished data from the International City Managers Association to develop a more direct measure of union political activity. Using this measure, it is found that an increase in union political activity leads to higher compensation and employment for public employee union members.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartel, Andrew and David Lewin. “Wages and Unionism in the Public Sector: The Case of Police.”Review of Economics and Statistics 63 (February 1981): 53–59.
Benecki, Stanley. “Municipal Expenditure Levels and Collective Bargaining.”Industrial Relations 17 (May 1978): 216–39.
Bennett, James and William Orzechowski. “The Voting Behavior of Bureaucrats: Some Empirical Evidence.”Public Choice 41 (February 1983): 271–83.
Ehrenberg, Ronald G. “Municipal Government Structure, Unionization, and the Wages of Firefighters.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 27 (October 1973): 36–48.
_____ and Gerald S. Goldstein. “A Model of Public Sector Wage Determination.”Journal of Urban Economics 2 (July 1975): 223–45.
Freeman, Richard B. and Robert C. Valletta. “The Effects of Public Sector Laws on Labor Market Institutions and Outcomes.” InWhen Public Sector Workers Unionize, Edited by Richard B. Freeman and Casey Ichniowski, pp. 81–103. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.
Frey, Bruno and Werner Pommerehne. “How Powerful Are Public Bureaucrats As Voters?”Public Choice 38 (March 1982): 253–62.
Gallagher, Daniel G. “Teacher Bargaining and School District Expenditures.”Industrial Relations 17 (May 1978): 231–37.
Hamilton, Bruce W. “The Flypaper Effect and Other Anomalies.”Journal of Public Economics 22 (October 1983): 347–61.
Hunter, William J. and Carol H. Rankin. “The Compsition of Public Sector Compensation: The Effects of Unionization and Bureaucratic Size.”Journal of Labor Research 9 (Winter 1988): 29–42.
Ichniowski, Casey and Jeffrey Zax. “The Effects of Public Sector Unionism on Pay, Employment, Department Budgets, and Municipal Expenditures.” InWhen Public Sector Workers Unionize, Edited by Richard B. Freeman and Casey Ichniowski, pp. 323–61. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.
Schmenner, Roger. “The Determination of Municipal Employee Wages.”Review of Economics and Statistics 55 (February 1973): 83–90.
Spizman, Lawrence M. “Public Employee Unions.”Journal of Labor Research 1 (Fall 1980): 265–73.
Valletta, Robert G. “The Impact of Unionism on Municipal Expenditures and Revenues.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 42 (April 1989): 430–42.
Wellington, Harvey H. and Ralph K. Winter.The Union and the Cities. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1971.
Zax, Jeffrey S. “Wages, Nonwage Compensation, and Municipal Unions.”Industrial Relations 27 (Fall 1988): 301–317.
_____. “Employment and Local Public Sector Unions.”Industrial Relations 28 (Winter 1989): 21–31.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O’Brien, K.M. Compensation, employment, and the political activity of public employee unions. Journal of Labor Research 13, 189–203 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685477
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685477