Skip to main content
Log in

Health care allocation, public consultation and the concept of ‘Health’

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Health Care Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By comparing models of market-based allocation with state-controlled national health care systems, it will be suggested that the way in which different communicaties deal with the allocation of health care is central to their expression of what might be called a moral self-understanding. That is to say that the provision of health care may be expected to be a focus of communal debate, not simply about morally acceptable and unacceptable actions, but also about the community’s understanding of what it is that makes for a worthwhile and morally defensible human life. This moral self-understanding is seen to be entwined with the different concepts of ‘health’ that are implicit in different systems of allocation. In conclusion, it will be suggested that decisions concerning health care allocation must be made in response to a continuing, public and open debate about that health and health care mean to a particular community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fleck, L.M. (1994). Just caring: health reform and health care rationing.The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19, 435–443.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nozick, R. (1974).Anarchy, State and Utopia, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Moffit, R.E. (1994). Personal freedom and responsibility: the ethical foundations of a market-based health care reform.The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19, 471–481.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fleck, L.M. (1990). Justice, HMOs, and the invisible rationing of health care resources.Bioethics 4, 97–120.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Seedhouse, D. (1986).Health: The Foundations for Achievement, John Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Spicker, S.F. (1995). Going off the dole: a prudential and ethical critique of the ‘healthfare’ state. In,Reforming Health Care: The Philosophy and Practice of International Health Care Reform, ed. by D. Seedhouse, John Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Daniels, N. (1985).Just Health Care, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Strosberg, M.A.et al. (1992).Rationing America’s Medical Care: The Oregon Plan and Beyond, Brookings Institution, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gallie, W.B. (1956). Essntially contested concepts.Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56, 167–198.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Habermas, J. (1990). Discourse ethics: notes on a program of philosophical justification. In,Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, Polity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Edgar, A. Health care allocation, public consultation and the concept of ‘Health’. Health Care Anal 6, 193–198 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02678104

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02678104

Keywords

Navigation