Skip to main content
Log in

Guidelines for training in the ethical conduct of scientific research

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Historically, scientists in training have learned the rules of ethical conduct by the example of their advisors and other senior scientists and by practice. This paper is intended to serve as a guide for the beginning scientist to some fundamental principles of scientific research ethics. The paper focuses less on issues of outright dishonesty or fraud, and more on the positive aspects of ethical scientific behavior; in other words, what a scientist should do to maintain a high level of ethical conduct in research.

There are a number of fairly specific rules, guidelines, or commonly accepted operating principles that have evolved for the ethical conduct of science. In order to discuss this code of ethics, this paper is divided into sections dealing with specific areas of scientific ethics. These areas are: data collection and storage, ownership of data, confidentiality, communication, authorship, collaboration, the peer review system, and rules of dealing with ethical complaints. Illustrative case histories are presented to provide examples of the type of ethical dispute or problem being discussed. If scientific trainees learn the accepted rules of behavior that govern the conduct of science, ethical problems that arise out of ignorance, misunderstanding, or poor communication can be avoided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Selected references

  1. Macrina, F. and Munro, C.L. (1993) Graduate Teaching in Principles of Scientific IntegrityAcademic Medicine.68: 879–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bulgar, R.E., Heitman, E., and Reiser, S.J. (1993)The Ethical Dimensions of the Biological Sciences. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Porter, R.J., and Malone, T.E. (eds) (1992)Biomedical Research — Collaboration and Conflict of Interest. Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore MD.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Teich, A.H. and Frankel, M.S. (1992)Good Science and Responsible Scientists. AAAS Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fischbach, R.L. and Peterson, L.M. (1992)The Harvard Program in the Practice of Scientific Investigation. Harvard Medical School.

  6. Chubin, D.E. and Hackett, E.J. (1990)Peerless Science: Peer Review and US Science Policy. State Univ NY Press. Albany NY.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Foltz, R. and Penn, T. (1990)Protecting Scientific Ideas and Inventions, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Committee on the Conduct of Science, (1989)On Being a Scientist. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kohn, A. (1988)False Prophets. Basil Blackwell Ltd., Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Watson, S. (1987) Co-Author-Responsibility, Issue Under Study.Scientist, Jan. 12, 1.

  11. Max, B. (1984) Ethics, Ambiguity and Authorship.Trends in Pharm. Sci., May, 180

  12. Executive Council Association of American Medical Colleges. (1982) Maintenance of High Ethical Standards in the Conduct of Research.J. Med. Educ. 57: 896.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Broad, W.J. (1982) NIH Grapples with Misconduct.Science 217: 227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garte, S.J. Guidelines for training in the ethical conduct of scientific research. Sci Eng Ethics 1, 59–70 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02628698

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02628698

Keywords

Navigation