Abstract
Historically, scientists in training have learned the rules of ethical conduct by the example of their advisors and other senior scientists and by practice. This paper is intended to serve as a guide for the beginning scientist to some fundamental principles of scientific research ethics. The paper focuses less on issues of outright dishonesty or fraud, and more on the positive aspects of ethical scientific behavior; in other words, what a scientist should do to maintain a high level of ethical conduct in research.
There are a number of fairly specific rules, guidelines, or commonly accepted operating principles that have evolved for the ethical conduct of science. In order to discuss this code of ethics, this paper is divided into sections dealing with specific areas of scientific ethics. These areas are: data collection and storage, ownership of data, confidentiality, communication, authorship, collaboration, the peer review system, and rules of dealing with ethical complaints. Illustrative case histories are presented to provide examples of the type of ethical dispute or problem being discussed. If scientific trainees learn the accepted rules of behavior that govern the conduct of science, ethical problems that arise out of ignorance, misunderstanding, or poor communication can be avoided.
Similar content being viewed by others
Selected references
Macrina, F. and Munro, C.L. (1993) Graduate Teaching in Principles of Scientific IntegrityAcademic Medicine.68: 879–886.
Bulgar, R.E., Heitman, E., and Reiser, S.J. (1993)The Ethical Dimensions of the Biological Sciences. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Porter, R.J., and Malone, T.E. (eds) (1992)Biomedical Research — Collaboration and Conflict of Interest. Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore MD.
Teich, A.H. and Frankel, M.S. (1992)Good Science and Responsible Scientists. AAAS Washington D.C.
Fischbach, R.L. and Peterson, L.M. (1992)The Harvard Program in the Practice of Scientific Investigation. Harvard Medical School.
Chubin, D.E. and Hackett, E.J. (1990)Peerless Science: Peer Review and US Science Policy. State Univ NY Press. Albany NY.
Foltz, R. and Penn, T. (1990)Protecting Scientific Ideas and Inventions, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Committee on the Conduct of Science, (1989)On Being a Scientist. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Kohn, A. (1988)False Prophets. Basil Blackwell Ltd., Oxford, UK.
Watson, S. (1987) Co-Author-Responsibility, Issue Under Study.Scientist, Jan. 12, 1.
Max, B. (1984) Ethics, Ambiguity and Authorship.Trends in Pharm. Sci., May, 180
Executive Council Association of American Medical Colleges. (1982) Maintenance of High Ethical Standards in the Conduct of Research.J. Med. Educ. 57: 896.
Broad, W.J. (1982) NIH Grapples with Misconduct.Science 217: 227.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Garte, S.J. Guidelines for training in the ethical conduct of scientific research. Sci Eng Ethics 1, 59–70 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02628698
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02628698