Skip to main content
Log in

An inpatient trial of the safety and efficacy of losartan compared with placebo and enalapril in patients with essential hypertension

  • Renin, ACE Inhibitors and AII Receptor Blockades
  • Published:
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The antihypertensive activity and safety of losartan, a specific and selective antogonist of angiotensin II (subtype 1) receptors, was evaluated in 100 inpatients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. After a 2-week, single-blind, out patient placebo lead-in period, the last 2 days of which included inpatient monitoring of baseline blood pressure, the patients were assigned randomly to receive once-daily doses of either placebo; 50, 100, or 150 mg losartan; or 10 mg enalapril. Patients were treated double blind for 5 days, followed by a day for the study of drug withdrawal. Beginning with the first dose, the three doses of losartan and enalapril significantly decreased peak and trough systolic and diastolic blood pressures compared with placebo (p<-0.05). The area under the blood pressure curve was analyzed as an assessment of total blood pressure change throughout the day. On day 1, total blood pressure reduction with losartan (50–150 mg) was slightly less than with enalapril. By day 5 of double-blind treatment, the reduction in blood pressure in these groups was similar, suggesting that losartan has a slower onset of action than enalapril. No rebound hypertension was observed after study-drug discontinuation. Losartan was well tolerated in this trial, with an adverse event profile similar to placebo and enalapril.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. GarrisonJC, PeachMJ. Renin and angiotensin. In GilmanAG, RallTW, NiesAS, TaylorP, eds.Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1990:749–763.

    Google Scholar 

  2. EhiersMRW, RiordanJF. Angiotensin-converting enzyme: Biochemistry and molecular biology. In LaraghJH, BrennerBM, eds.Hypertension, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Management. New York: Raven Press, 1990:1217–1231.

    Google Scholar 

  3. KarlbergBE. Cough and inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system.J Hypertens 1993;11(Suppl 3):S49-S52.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. LacourciereY, LeFebvreJ, NakhleG, FaisonEP, SnavelyDB, NelsonEB. Association between cough and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors vs. angiotensin II antagonists: The design of a prospective, controlled study.J Hypertens 1994;12(Suppl 2):S49-S53.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. SieglPKS. Discovery of losartan, the first specific nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist.J Hypertens 1993;11(Suppl 3):S19-S22.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. SmithRD, ChiuAT, WongPC, HerblinWF, TimmermansPBMWM. Pharmacology of nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists.Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 1992;32: 135–165.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. TimmermansPBMWM, BenfieldP, ChiuAT, HerblinWF, WongPC, SmithRD. Angiotensin II receptors and functional correlates.Am J Hypertens 1992;5:221S-235S.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. WongPC, PriceWJ, ChiuAT, et al. In vivo pharmacology of DuP 753.Am J Hypertens 1991;44:228S-298S.

    Google Scholar 

  9. CockcroftJR, SciberrasDG, GoldbergMR, RitterJM. Comparison of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition with angiotensin II receptor antagonism in the human forearm.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1993;22:579–584.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. ChristenY, WaeberB, NussbergerJ, et al. Oral administration of DuP 753, a specific angiotensin II receptor antagonist, to normal male volunteers. Inhibition of pressor response to exogenous angiotensin I and II.Circulation 1991; 83:1333–1342.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. ChristenY, WaeberB, NussbergerJ, LeeRJ, TimmermansPBMWM, BrunnerHR. Dose-response relationship following oral administration of DuP 753 to normal humans.Am J Hypertens 1991;4:350S-353S.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. MunafoA, ChristenY, NussbergerJ, et al. Drug concentration response relationships in normal volunteers after oral administration of losartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist.Clin Pharmacol 1992;51:513–521.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. BrunnerDB, DespondsG, BiollazJ, et al. Effect of a new angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor MK 421 and its lysine analogue on the components of the renin system in healthy subjects.Br J Clin Pharmacol 1981;11:461–467.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. GavrasH, BiollazJ, WaeberB, BrunnerHR, GavrasI, DaviesRO. Antihypertensive effect of the new oral angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor MK-421.Lancet 1981;2: 543–547.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. GradmanAH, ArcuriK, GoldbergAI, IkedaLS, NelsonEB, SnavelyDB, SweetCS. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind parallel study of various doses of losartan potassium compared to enalapril maleate in patients with essential hypertension.Hypertension 1995;25: 1339–1344.

    Google Scholar 

  16. KeimHJ, DrayerJI, CaseDB, et al. A role for renin in rebound hypertension and encephalopathy after infusion of saralasin acetate (Sar1Ala8-angiotensin II).N Engl J Med 1976;295:1175–1177.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. GoldbergAI, DunlayMC, SweetCS. The safety and tolerability of losartan potassium, and angiotensin II receptor antagonist in comparison to hydrochlorothiazide, atenolol, felodipine ER and ACE inhibitors for the treatment of systemic hypertension.Am J Cardiol 1995;75:793–795.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Byyny, R.L., Merrill, D.D., Bradstreet, T.E. et al. An inpatient trial of the safety and efficacy of losartan compared with placebo and enalapril in patients with essential hypertension. Cardiovasc Drug Ther 10, 313–319 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02627955

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02627955

Key Words

Navigation