Summary
This study reports the results of a critical comparison of five statistical methods for estimating the density of viable cells in a limiting dilution assay (LDA). Artificial data were generated using Monte Carlo simulation. The performance of each statistical method was examined with respect to the accuracy of its estimator and, most importantly, the accuracy of its associated estimated standard error (SE). The regression method was found to perform at a level that is unacceptable for scientific research, due primarily to gross underestimation of the SE. The maximum likelihood method exhibited the best overall performance. A corrected version of Taswell's weighted-mean method, which provides the best performance among all noniterative methods examined, is also presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berkson, J. Maximum likelihood and minimum chi-square estimates of the logistic function. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 50:130–162; 1955.
Berkson, J. Minimum chi-square, not maximum likelihood! Ann. Stat. 8:457–487; 1980.
Fazekas de St. Groth, S. The evaluation of limiting dilution assays. J. Immunol. Methods 49:R11-R23; 1982.
Goldstein, A. Biostatistics, an introductory text. New York: The Macmillan Company; 1964.
Hoel, P. G. Introduction to mathematical statistics, 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1962:224.
Kynast, G.; Weber, E. Analysis of a limiting dilution assay by using the single-hit Poisson model—an APL computer program. EDV Med. Biol. 14:53–57; 1983.
Lefkovits, I.; Waldman, H. Statistical tests, limitations and reproducibility. In: Limiting dilution analysis of cells in the immune system. England: Cambridge University Press; 1979:93–113.
Schmehl, M. S.; Cobb, L.; Bank, H. L. Power analysis of statistical methods for comparing treatment differences from limiting dilution assays. In Vitro 25:69–75; 1989.
Smith, V. K. Monte Carlo methods: their role for economics. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books; 1972.
Taswell, C. Limiting dilution assays for the determination of immunocompetent cell frequencies. I: Data analysis. J. Immunol. 126:1614–1619; 1981.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cobb, L., Cyr, L., Schmehl, M.K. et al. Comparison of statistical methods for the analysis of limiting dilution assays. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 25, 76–81 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02624414
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02624414