Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating clinical teaching in the medicine clerkship:

Relationship of instructor experience and training setting to ratings of teaching effectiveness

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A clinical teaching assessment form was used to evaluate the teaching by faculty and residents in the required third-year medicine clerkship over a two-year period. Data from 1,627 forms were analyzed for differences between groups of teachers at different experience levels and for comparison of teaching programs at different training sites. The level of involvement of instructor with student correlated with ratings by the students. Among groups of instructors, chief medical residents received the highest overall ratings. Faculty were rated higher than first-, second-, and third-year residents when degree of involvement of instructor with student was high. Ratings among faculty of different academic ranks were not significantly different. Analysis of data from different clinical settings showed that the teaching efforts by clinical faculty members in the ambulatory setting received the highest ratings from students. Although increased involvement of instructors with students or other factors may have led to the higher ratings in the ambulatory setting, the results are encouraging for the use of ambulatory teaching sites for the basic medicine clerkship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mattern WD, Weinholtz D, Friedman CP. The attending physician as teacher. N Engl J Med 1983;308:1129–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stritter FT, Hain JD, Grimes DA. Clinical teaching reexamined. J Med Educ 1975;50:155–8

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eichna LW. Medical-school education, 1975–1979: a student’s perspective. N Engl J Med 1980;303:727–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Skeff KM. Evaluation of a method for improving the teaching performance of attending physicians. Am J Med 1983;75:465–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Irby D. Evaluating instruction in medical education. J Med Educ 1983;58:844–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Irby DM. Clinical teacher effectiveness in medicine. J Med Educ 1978;53:808–15.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramsey PG, Shannon NF, Fleming L, Wenrich M, Peckham PD, Dale DC. The use of objective examinations in medicine clerkships: a ten year experience. Am J Med 1986;81:669–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Irby D, Rakestraw P. Evaluating clinical teaching in medicine. J Med Educ 1981;56:181–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Downie NW. Student evaluation of faculty. J Higher Educ 1952;23:495–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kiker M. Characteristics of the effective teacher. Nurs Outlook 1973;21:721–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schroeder SA, Showstack JA, Gerbert B. Residency training in internal medicine: time for a change? Ann Intern Med 1986;104:554–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kantor SM, Griner PF. Educational needs in general internal medicine as perceived by prior residents. J Med Educ 1981;56:748–56.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received from the Department of Medicine (Division of General Internal Medicine) and the Division of Research in Medical Education, University of Washington School of Medicine, and the Educational Assessment Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramsey, P.G., Gillmore, G.M. & Irby, D.M. Evaluating clinical teaching in the medicine clerkship:. J Gen Intern Med 3, 351–355 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02595793

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02595793

Key words

Navigation