Skip to main content
Log in

Bayesian transformed models for small area estimation

  • Published:
Test Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sample surveys are usually designed and analyzed to produce estimates for larger areas. However, sample sizes are often not large enough to give adequate precision for small area estimates of interest. To overcome such difficulties,borrowing strength from related small areas via modeling becomes an appropriate approach. In line with this, we propose hierarchical models with power transformations for improving the precision of small area predictions. The proposed methods are applied to satellite data in conjunction with survey data to estimate mean acreage under a specified crop for counties in Iowa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson, A.C. and R.D. Cook (1997). Design for a response transformation parameter.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B,59, 111–124.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G.E., R.M. Harter and W.A. Fuller (1988). An error components model for prediction of county crop areas using survey and satellite data.Journal of the American Statistical Association,83, 28–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best, N.G., M.K. Cowles and K. Vines (1995). CODA: Convergence Diagnosis and Output Analysis Software for Gibbs sampling output, Version 0.30. Technical Report, MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge.

  • Box, G.E.P. and D.R. Cox (1964). An analysis of transformations.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B,26, 211–252.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Brackstone, G.J. (1987). Small area data: policy issues and technical challenges. InSmall Area Statistics, 3–20 (R. Platck, J.N.K. Rao, C.E. Sarndal and M.P. Singh, eds.). John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagne, G.A. (2001). Bayesian modeling of spatially correlated latent variables in small area estimation.Far East Journal of Theoretical Statistics,5, 67–79.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dagne, G.A. and S.J. Press (1997). Bayesian prediction for small areas using SUR models.Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods,26, 1355–1379.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, A.M., L. Tian and L.J. Wei (2001). Estimation for the Box-Cox transformation model without assuming parametric error distribution.Journal of the American Statistical Association,96, 1097–1101.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, W.A. and R.M. Harter (1987). The multivariate components of variance model for small area estimation. InSmall Area Statistics, 103–123 (R. Platck, J.N.K. Rao, C.E. Sarndal and M.P. Singh, eds.), John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, A.E., D.K. Dey and H. Chang (1992). Model determination using predictive distributions with implementations via sampling-based methods. InBayesian Statistics 4, pp. 147–167 (J.M. Bernardo, J.O. Berger, A.P. Dawid and A.F.M. Smith, eds.) Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, A.E. and Smith, A.M. (1990). Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities.Journal of the American Statistical Association 85, 398–409.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Geman, S. and D. Geman (1984). Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distribution, and the Bayesian restoration of images.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,6, 721–741.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, M., K. Natarajan, T.W.F. Stroud and B.P. Carlin (1998). Generalized linear models for small area estimation.Journal of the American Statistical Association,93, 273–282.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, M. and J.N.K. Rao (1994). Small area estimation: an appraisal.Statistical Science,9, 55–93.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hoaglin, D.C., F. Mosteller and J.W. Tukey (1983).Understanding Robust and Exploratory Data Analysis, John Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kackar, R.N. and D.A. Harville (1984). Approximations for standard errors of estimators of fixed and random effects in mixed linear models.Journal of the American Statistical Association,79, 853–861.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Keene, O.N. (1995). The log-transformation is special.Statistics in Medicine,14, 811–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logothetis, N. (1990). Box-Cox transformations and Taguchi method.Applied Statistics,39, 31–48.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C.N. (1988). Determining the accuracy of Bayes, empirical Bayes estimates in the familiar exponential families. InStatistical Decision Theory and Related Topics IV,1, 251–263 (S.S. Gupta and J.O. Berger, eds.) Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pericchi, L.R. (1981). A Bayesian approach to transformations to normality.Biometrika,68, 35–43.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sakia, R.M. (1992). The Box-Cox transformation technique: A review.The Statistician,41, 169–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.F.M. and G.O. Roberts (1993). Bayesian computation via the Gibbs sampler and related Markov chain Monte Carlo methods (with discussion).Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B,55, 3–23.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, P.J. (1985). Transformations for components of variance and covariance.Biometrika,72, 233–239.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J.M.G. (1985). Measures of location of skew distributions obtained through Box-Cox transformations.Journal of the American Statistical Association,80, 427–432.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Getachew A. Dagne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dagne, G.A. Bayesian transformed models for small area estimation. Test 10, 375–391 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02595703

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02595703

Key Words

AMS subject classification

Navigation