Summary
A useful non-parametric class of priors is formed as those probability measures which lie between an upper and a lower measure and it is called a Wand of probability measures Lavine (1991), Moreno and Pericchi (1991), Wasserman and Kadane (1992). This class allows considerable freedom in tail behaviour as long as the upper and lower measures have different tails. This property is inherited from the class of Interval of measures DeRobertis and Hartigan (1981), from which the Band of probability measures class is obtained by restricting attention to those measures that integrate to one, Although the analysis of this restricted class is somewhat more involved, the restriction is quite natural and may lead to robustness in situations in which the larger class is not robust. In fact, it is a generalization of the class implicitly considered by Edwards, Lindman and Savage (1963) in “Precise Measurement Theory”. An empirical analysis is performed with the two classes above. That is, we choose within a class of priors that measure which maximizes the probability of the actual data Good (1983). This “optimal” measure is used in this robust Bayesian context to assess the band of probability measures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berger, J. (1984). The robust Bayesian viewpoint.Robustness of Bayesian Analysis (J. Kadane, ed.). Amsterdam: North-Holland, 63–144, (with discussion).
Berger, J. (1985).Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Berger, J. (1989). Robust Bayesian Analysis: Sensitivity to the Prior.J. Statist. Planning and Inference 25, 303–328.
Berger, J. and Berliner, M. L. (1986). Robust Bayes and Empirical Bayes Analysis with ε-contaminated priors.Ann. Statist. 14, 461–486.
DeRobertis, L. and Hartigan, J. A. (1981). Bayesian Inference using intervals of measures.Ann. Statist. 9, 235–244.
Edwards, W., Lindman, H. and Savage, L. J. (1963). Bayesian Statistical Inference for Psychological Research.Psychological Review 10, 3, 450–501.
Good, I. J. (1983).Good Thinking: The Foundations of Probability and its Applications. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Lavine, M. (1991). Sensitivity in Bayesian statistics: the prior and the likelihood.J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 86, 400–403.
Lavine, M., Wasserman, L. and Wolpert, R. (1994). Linearization of Bayesian Robustness problems.J. Statist. Planning and Inference (to appear).
Moreno, E. and Cano, J. A. (1991). Robust Bayesian Analysis with ε-contaminations partially known.J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 53, 143–155.
Moreno, E. and González, A. (1990). Empirical Bayes Analysis for ε-contaminated priors with shape and quantile constraints.Brazilian Journal of Probability and Statistics 4, 177–200.
Moreno, E. and Pericchi, L. R. (1990). Sensitivity of the Bayesian analysis to the priors: Structural contaminations with specified quantiles of parametric families.Actas III Congreso Latinoamericano en Probabilidad y Estadística Matemática, 143–158.
Moreno, E. and Pericchi, L. R. (1992). Bands of probability measures: A Robust Bayesian Analysis.Bayesian Statistics 4 (J. M. Bernardo, J. O. Berger, A. P. Dawid and A. F. M. Smith, eds.). Oxford: University Press, 707–715.
Moreno, E., Pericchi, L. R. and Kadane, J. B. (1993). Precise bounds for precise measurement. In preparation.
Pericchi, L. R. and Walley, P. (1991). Robust Bayesian credible intervals and prior ignorance.Internat. Statist. Rev. 59, 1–23.
Sivaganesan, S. and Berger, J. (1989). Ranges of posterior measures for priors with unimodal contaminations.Ann. Statist. 17, 868–889.
Wasserman, L. and Kadane, J. B. (1992). Computing bounds on Expectations.J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 87, 516–523.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moreno, E., Pericchi, L.R. Prior assessments for bands of probability measures: Empirical bayes analysis. Test 2, 101–110 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02562670
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02562670