Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Atomic quantum zeno effect for ensembles and single systems

  • Part II. Invited Papers Dedicated to Mikio Namiki
  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The so-called quantum Zeno effect is essentially a consequence of the projection postulate for ideal measurements. To test the effect, Itanoet al. have performed an experiment on an ensemble of atoms where rapidly repeated level measurements were realized by means of short laser pulses. Using dynamical considerations, we give an explanation why the projection postulate can be applied in good approximation to such measurements. Corrections to ideal measurements are determined explicitly. This is used to discuss how far the experiment of Itanoet al. can be considered as a test of the quantum Zeno effect. We also analyze a new possible experiment on a single atom where stochastic light and dark periods can be interpreted as manifestation of the quantum Zeno effect. We show that the measurement point of view gives a quick and intuitive understanding of experiments of the above type, although a finer analysis has to take the corrections into account.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. Lüders,Ann. (Leipzig) Phys. 8, 323 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. von Neumann,Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik (Springer, Berlin, 1932); English translation:Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, 1955), Chapter V.1.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Lüders, private communication to G. C. H.

  4. A. Sudbury, private communication.

  5. P. A. M. Dirac,The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 1st edn. (Clarendon, Oxford, 1930), p. 49.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. B. Misra and E. C. G. Sudarshan,J. Math. Phys. 18, 756 (1977). For earlier work see, e.g., W. Yourgrau, inProblems in the Philosophy of Science. Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London 1965, I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, eds. (North-Holland, Amsterdam 1968), p. 178, where the quantum Zeno effect is attributed to Turing. For related work see, e.g., A. Degasperis, L. Fonda, and G. C. Ghirardi,Nuovo Cimento A 21, 471 (1974). B. Misra and K. B. Sinha,Helv. Phys. Acta 50, 99 (1977). C. B. Chui, E. C. G. Sudarshan, and B. Misra,Phys. Rev. D 16, 520 (1977). M. Simonius,Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 890 (1978).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. W. M. Itano, D. J. Heinzen, J. J. Bollinger, and D. J. Wineland,Phys. Rev. A 41, 2295 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Peres and A. Ron,Phys. Rev. A 42, 5720 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. T. Petrosky, S. Tasaki, and I. Prigogine,Phys. Lett. A. 151, 109 (1990).Physica A 170, 306 (1991).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. L. E. Ballentine,Found. Phys. 20, 1329 (1990);Phys. Rev. A 43, 5165 (1991).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. V. Frerichs and A. Schenzle,Phys. Rev. A 44, 1962 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. E. Block and P. R. Berman,Phys. Rev. A 44, 1466 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. D. Home and M. A. B. Whitaker,J. Phys. A 25, 657 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. M. J. Gagen and G. J. Milburn,Phys. Rev. A 47, 1467 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. A. L. Rivera and S. M. Chumakov,J. Mod. Opt. 41, 839 (1994).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Namiki and T. Tajiri,Phys. Lett. A 166, 5 (1992). S. Pascazio, M. Namiki, G. Badurek, and H. Rauch,Phys. Lett. A 179, 155 (1993). S. Pascazio and M. Namiki,Phys. Rev A 50, 4582 (1994). H. Nakazato, M. Namiki, S. Pascazio, and H. Rauch,Phys. Lett. A 199, 27 (1995). H. Nakazato, M. Namiki, and S. Pascazio,Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 10, 247 (1996), and references therein.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. See, e.g., E. Eberle,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 20, 272 (1977); M. Simonius,Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 980 (1978); G. C. Ghirardi, C. Omero, T. Weber, and A. Rimini,Nuovo Cimento A 52. 421 (1979); K. Kraus,Found. Phys. 11, 547 (1981); R. A. Harris and L. Stodolsky,Phys. Lett. B 116, 464 (1982); C. B. Chiu, B. Misra, and E. C. G. Sudarshan,Phys. Lett. B 117, 34 (1982); A. Sudbery,Ann. Phys. 157, 512 (1984); E. Joos,Phys. Rev. D 29, 1626 (1984); D. P. L. Castrigiano and U. Mutze,Phys. Rev. A 30, 2210 (1984); W. C. Schieve, L. P. Horwitz, and J. Levitan,Phys. Lett. A 136, 264 (1989); R. H. Dicke,Found. Phys. 19, 385 (1989); M. Damnjanovic,Phys. Lett. A 149, 333 (1990); A. Peres and A. Ron,Phys. Rev. A 42, 5720 (1990); T. F. Jordan, E. C. G. Sudarshan, and P. Valanju,Phys. Rev. A 44, 3340 (1991); D. I. Fivel,Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 285 (1991); G. Groessing and A. Zeilinger,Physica D 50, 321 (1991); H. Fearn and W. E. Lamb,Phys. Rev. A 46, 1199 (1992); R. Reibold,Physica A 190, 413 (1992); D. Home and M. A. B. Whitaker,J. Phys. A 25, 657 (1992); M. J. Gagen and G. J. Milburn,Phys. Rev. A 47, 1467 (1993); M. J. Gagen, H. M. Wiseman, and G. J. Milburn,Phys. Rev. A 48, 132 (1993); P. Blanchard and A. Jadczyk,Phys. Lett. A 183, 272 (1993); G. S. Agarwal and S. P. Tewari,Phys. Lett. A 185, 139 (1994); T. P. Spiller,Phys. Lett. A 192, 163 (1994); T. P. Altenmüller and A. Schenzle,Phys. Rev. A 49, 2016 (1994); K. Urbanowski,Phys. Rev. A 50, 2847 (1994); J. I. Cirac, A. Schenzle, and P. Zoller,Europhys. Lett. 27, 123 (1994); L. S. Schulman, A. Rafagni, and D. Mugnai,Phys. Scr. 49, 536 (1994); C. P. Sun, X. X. Yi, and X. J. Liu,Prog. Phys. 43, 585 (1995); S. M. Chumakov, K. E. Hellwig, and R. L. Rivera,Phys. Lett. A 197, 73 (1995); A. A. Kulaga,Phys. Lett. A 202, 7 (1995); A. Venugopalan and R. Gosh,Phys. Lett. A 204, 11 (1995); U. Tambini, C. Presilla, and R. Onofrio,Phys. Rev. A 51, 967 (1995); X. G. Wang,Chin. Phys. Lett. 12, 728 (1995); M. B. Plenio, P. L. Knight, and R. C. Thompson,Opt. Commun. 123, 278 (1996); M. Keller and G. Mahler,Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 8, 223 (1996); W. L. Power and P. L. Knight,Phys. Rev. A 53, 1052 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Beige and G. C. Hegerfeldt,Phys. Rev. A 53, 53 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Beige, G. C. Hegerfeldt, and D. G. Sondermann,Quantum Semiclass. Optics 8, 999 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Beige and G. C. Hegerfeldt,J. Mod. Opt. 44, 345 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. R. J. Cook,Phys. Scr. T 21, 49 (1988).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. R. J. Cook,Prog. Opt. 28, 361 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. G. C. Hegerfeldt and T. S. Wilser 1992 in:Classical and Quantum Systems. Proceedings. II. International Wigner Symposium, July 1991, H. D. Doebner, W. Scherer, and F. Schroeck, eds. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992), p. 104.

    Google Scholar 

  24. T. S. Wilser, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Göttingen (1991).

  25. G. C. Hegerfeldt,Phys. Rev. A 47, 449 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. G. C. Hegerfeldt and D. G. Sondermann,Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 8, 121 (1996).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. H. Carmichael,An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics (Lecture Notes in Physics) (Springer, Berlin, 1993).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. J. Dalibard, Y. Castin, and K. Mølmer,Phys. Lett. 68, 580 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. A. Beige and G. C. Hegerfeldt,J. Phys. A 30, 1323 (1997).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. H. G. Dehmelt,Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 20, 60 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  31. See for example C. Cohen-Tannoudji, and J. Dalibard,Europhysics Lett. 1, 441 (1986). G. C. Hegerfeldt and M. B. Plenio,Phys. Rev. A 46, 373 (1992).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Göttingen, Bunsenstrasse 9, D-37073, Göttingen, Germany

    Almut Beige, Gerhard C. Hegerfeldt & Dirk G. Sondermann

Authors
  1. Almut Beige
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gerhard C. Hegerfeldt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dirk G. Sondermann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beige, A., Hegerfeldt, G.C. & Sondermann, D.G. Atomic quantum zeno effect for ensembles and single systems. Found Phys 27, 1671–1688 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02551444

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02551444

Keywords

Search

Navigation