Skip to main content
Log in

Introductory article

The mind-society problem

  • Articles
  • Published:
Mind & Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mind-society problem deals with the relations between mental and social phenomena. The problem is crucial in the main methodologies of social sciences. The thesis of hermeneutics is that we can only understand but not explain the relationship between beliefs and social action because mental and social events are not natural events. The thesis of social holism is that social phenomena are emergent and irreducible to mental phenomena. The thesis of rational choice theory is that social phenomena are reducible to mental phenomena and this reduction is explained by unrealistic a priori principles of rationality. These theses depend on their different solutions to the following fundamental philosophical issues: the mind-body identity; the causal nature of social explanation; the realistic goal of science. A positive answer to these issues implies support of a different solution to the mind-society problem: social phenomena are conventional concepts and they can be reduced and explained in terms of realistic concepts describing the causal mechanisms of individual reasoning and decision-making. Cognitive psychology seems to supply us some initial tentative models to explain social action, but research into neuropsychology might be able to generate the proper causal representations of the relation between mind and action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Anderson, J.A. & Rosenfeld, E. (1988)Neurocomputing: Foundations of Research (Cambridge, MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudon, R. (1994)The Art of Self Persuasion (London, Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, P.W. & Holyoak, K.J. (1985) Pragmatic Reasoning Schemas,Cognitive Psychology, 17, pp. 391–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, P.W. & Holyoak, K.J. (1989) On the natural selection of reasoning theories,Cognition, 33. pp. 285–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P.M. (1979)Scientific realism and the plasticity of mind (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P.M. (1995)The Engine of Reason, The Seat of the Soul: A Philosophical Journey into the Brain (Cambridge, MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P.M. (1998) The neural Representation of the Social World, in P.A. Danielson (Ed.)Modelling Rationality, Morality and Evolution (Oxford, Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P.S. & Sejnowski, T. (1992)The Computational Brain (Cambridge, MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (1978)Brainstorms (Montgomery, Bradford Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. (1977) Logic meaning and conceptual role,Journal of Philosophy, 74, pp. 379–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. (1975)The language of thought (New York, Cromwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. (1990)A theory of content and other essays (Cambridge, MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1971)The interpretations of cultures (New York, Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.K. (1983) New Work for a Theory of Universals,Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 61, pp. 109–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I.L. (1982)Groupthink (Boston, Houghton Mifflin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, R. (1992) Political implications of loss aversion,Political Psychology, 13, pp. 187–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson Laird, P. (1983)Mental Models (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson Laird, P. (1988)The computer and the mind (London, William Collins Sons & Co.). Italian Translation, Il Mulino, Bologna, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson Laird, P. & Byrne, R.M.J. (1990)Deduction (Hillsdale, Erlbaum).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanheman, D., Slovic, P. & Tversky, A. (Eds.) (1982)Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. (1998)Mind in a Physical World (Cambridge, MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. (1990)Unified theory of cognition (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. & Simon, H. (1972)Human Problem solving. (Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R.E. & Ross, L. (1980)Human Inference: strategies and shortcomings of social judgement (Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkin, S. (1979)The Rational Peasant (Berkeley, University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Psillos, S. (Forthcoming) What Comes First, Explanation or Causation?,Lascomes Series

  • Quattrone, C. & Tversky, A. (1988) Contrasting rational and psychological analysis of political choice,American Political Science Review, 82, pp. 719–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. (1966),Arms and Influence. (New Haven, Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1985)Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers 2. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. & Kanheman, D. (1986) Rational choice and the framing of decision,Journal of Business, 59, pp. S51-S278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viale, R. (1992) Cognitive Constraints of Economic Rationality, in H. Simon, M. Egidi, R. Marris & R. Viale (Eds.)Economics, Bounded Rationality and the Cognitive Revolution. (Aldershot, Edward Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Viale, R., (1994) Dans la Boîte noire: les mécanismes cognitifs de la décision scientifique, in R. Boudon and M. Clavelin (Eds.)Le rélativisme est-il résistible? (Paris, Presses Universitaires de France).

    Google Scholar 

  • Viale, R., (1997) From neoclassical to cognitive economics: the epistemological constraints of feasibility and realism, in R. Viale (Ed.),Cognitive Economics, Lascomes Series I.

  • Viale, R. (1999) Causal Cognition and Causal Realism,International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 13, pp. 147–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1949)The Methodology of the Social Sciences (Glencoe, Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, A. (1978) Gods, Ghosts and Ancestors, in A. Wolf (Ed.)Studies in Chinese Society (Stanford, Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Viale, R. Introductory article. Mind & Society 1, 3–24 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02512226

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02512226

Keywords

Navigation