Abstract
This paper investigates the justification of the concept of a balance of nature in population ecology as a case of model based reasoning. The ecologist A.J. Nicholson understood balance as an outcome of intraspecific competition in populations. His models implied density dependent growth of populations oscillating around an equilibrium state. Today the assumption of density dependence is tested statistically by using models that represent certain data dynamics. This however, does not test for density dependence in the sense suggested by Nicholson. From a suggested mechanism in nature equilibrium has become a property of a data set. I call this a change of reference of the term “equilibrium”. The new equilibrium is a necessary but not sufficient condition for the old equilibrium. However, some ecologists suggest using the new definition instead of the old one. I argue that the new definition of equilibrium points to a change in justification of the assumption of a balance in nature. This change has to be seen in relation to modeling strategies pursued by the scientific community. I argue that there is an interdependence between models, data, values, and evidence. Model based reasoning, though abstract and idealizing, has to be considered in a historical, philosophical, and social context.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Andrewartha, H.G. & Birch, L.C. (1954)The distribution and abundance of animals (Chicago, The University of Chicago Press).
Bailey, V.A. (1931) The interaction between hosts and parasites,Quart Jour Math, 2, pp. 68–77.
Bellows, T.S.J. (1981) The descriptive properties of some models for density dependence,J Anim Ecol., 50, pp. 139–56.
Bulmer, M.G. (1975) The statistical analysis of density dependence,Biometrics, 31, pp. 901–11.
Cartwright, N. (1983)How the laws of physics lie (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
Den Boer, P.J. & Reddingius, J. (1996)Regulation and stabilization paradigms in population ecology (London, Chapman & Hall).
Dennis, B. & Taper, M.L. (1994) Density dependence in time series observations of natural populations: Estimation and testing,Ecol Monogr, 64, pp. 205–24.
Eisenberg, R.M. (1966) The regulation of density in a natural population of the pond snail,Lymnea elodes. Ecology, 57, pp. 889–906.
Giere, R.N. (1999)Science without laws (Chicago-London The University of Chicago Press).
Hunter, M.D. & Price, P.W. (1998) Cycles in insect populations: delayed density dependence or exogenous driving variables?Ecol Entomol, 23, pp. 216–22.
Kingsland, S. (1995)Modeling nature (Chicago, The University of Chicago Press).
Lotka, A.J. (1925)Elements of physical biology (Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins Company).
Maelzer, D.A. (1970) The regression of LOG Nn+1 on LOGNn as a test of density dependence: An exercise with computer constructed density-independent populations,Ecology, 51, 5, pp. 810–22.
Morris, R.F. (1959) Single-factor analysis in population dynamics,Ecology, 40, 4, pp. 580–8.
Nicholson, A.J. (1933) The balance of animal populations,J Anim Ecol, 2, pp. 132–78.
Nicholson, A.J. & Bailey, V.A. (1935) The balance of animal populations, Part I, in L. Real, A. & J. Brown (Eds),Foundations of ecology (Chicago, The University of Chicago Press).
Pankratz, A. (1983)Forecasting with univariate Box-Jenkins Models (New York, John Wiley & Sons).
Pielou, E.C. (1974)Population and community ecology (New York, Gordon and Breach, Science Publishers Inc.)
Pollard, E., Lakhani, K.H. et al. (1987) The detection of density dependence from a series of annual censuses,Ecology, 68, 6, pp. 2046–55.
Royama, T. (1992)Analytical population dynamics (London, Chapman and Hall).
Suppe, F. (1989)The Semantic conception of theories and scientific realism (Urbana, University of Illinois Press).
Turchin, P. (1995) Population regulation: Old arguments and a new synthesis, in N. Cappuccino & P.W. Price (Eds),Population dynamics: New approaches and synthesis (San Diego, Academic Press), pp. 19–40.
Turchin, P. (1999) Population regulation: A synthetic view,Oikos, 84, 1, pp. 153–9.
Van Fraassen, B.C. (1980)The scientific image (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
Wartofsky, M.W. (1979)Models (Dordrecht, Reidel Publishing Company).
Weigend, A.S. (1994) Paradigm change in prediction,Philos Trans R Soc Lond, A 348, pp. 405–20.
Wolda, H. & Dennis, B. (1993) Density dependence tests, are they?Oecologia, 95, pp. 581–91.
Yule, U.G. (1927) On a method of investigation periodicities in disturbed series with special reference to Wofer's sunspot numbers,Philos Trans R Soc Lond, A 226, pp. 267–98.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haak, C. The history of models. Does it matter?. Mind & Society 3, 33–41 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02511864
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02511864