Skip to main content
Log in

The history of models. Does it matter?

  • Articles
  • Published:
Mind & Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the justification of the concept of a balance of nature in population ecology as a case of model based reasoning. The ecologist A.J. Nicholson understood balance as an outcome of intraspecific competition in populations. His models implied density dependent growth of populations oscillating around an equilibrium state. Today the assumption of density dependence is tested statistically by using models that represent certain data dynamics. This however, does not test for density dependence in the sense suggested by Nicholson. From a suggested mechanism in nature equilibrium has become a property of a data set. I call this a change of reference of the term “equilibrium”. The new equilibrium is a necessary but not sufficient condition for the old equilibrium. However, some ecologists suggest using the new definition instead of the old one. I argue that the new definition of equilibrium points to a change in justification of the assumption of a balance in nature. This change has to be seen in relation to modeling strategies pursued by the scientific community. I argue that there is an interdependence between models, data, values, and evidence. Model based reasoning, though abstract and idealizing, has to be considered in a historical, philosophical, and social context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Andrewartha, H.G. & Birch, L.C. (1954)The distribution and abundance of animals (Chicago, The University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, V.A. (1931) The interaction between hosts and parasites,Quart Jour Math, 2, pp. 68–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellows, T.S.J. (1981) The descriptive properties of some models for density dependence,J Anim Ecol., 50, pp. 139–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, M.G. (1975) The statistical analysis of density dependence,Biometrics, 31, pp. 901–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N. (1983)How the laws of physics lie (Oxford, Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Boer, P.J. & Reddingius, J. (1996)Regulation and stabilization paradigms in population ecology (London, Chapman & Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, B. & Taper, M.L. (1994) Density dependence in time series observations of natural populations: Estimation and testing,Ecol Monogr, 64, pp. 205–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, R.M. (1966) The regulation of density in a natural population of the pond snail,Lymnea elodes. Ecology, 57, pp. 889–906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R.N. (1999)Science without laws (Chicago-London The University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M.D. & Price, P.W. (1998) Cycles in insect populations: delayed density dependence or exogenous driving variables?Ecol Entomol, 23, pp. 216–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsland, S. (1995)Modeling nature (Chicago, The University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotka, A.J. (1925)Elements of physical biology (Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maelzer, D.A. (1970) The regression of LOG Nn+1 on LOGNn as a test of density dependence: An exercise with computer constructed density-independent populations,Ecology, 51, 5, pp. 810–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, R.F. (1959) Single-factor analysis in population dynamics,Ecology, 40, 4, pp. 580–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, A.J. (1933) The balance of animal populations,J Anim Ecol, 2, pp. 132–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, A.J. & Bailey, V.A. (1935) The balance of animal populations, Part I, in L. Real, A. & J. Brown (Eds),Foundations of ecology (Chicago, The University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pankratz, A. (1983)Forecasting with univariate Box-Jenkins Models (New York, John Wiley & Sons).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielou, E.C. (1974)Population and community ecology (New York, Gordon and Breach, Science Publishers Inc.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, E., Lakhani, K.H. et al. (1987) The detection of density dependence from a series of annual censuses,Ecology, 68, 6, pp. 2046–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royama, T. (1992)Analytical population dynamics (London, Chapman and Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppe, F. (1989)The Semantic conception of theories and scientific realism (Urbana, University of Illinois Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turchin, P. (1995) Population regulation: Old arguments and a new synthesis, in N. Cappuccino & P.W. Price (Eds),Population dynamics: New approaches and synthesis (San Diego, Academic Press), pp. 19–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turchin, P. (1999) Population regulation: A synthetic view,Oikos, 84, 1, pp. 153–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Fraassen, B.C. (1980)The scientific image (Oxford, Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartofsky, M.W. (1979)Models (Dordrecht, Reidel Publishing Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigend, A.S. (1994) Paradigm change in prediction,Philos Trans R Soc Lond, A 348, pp. 405–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolda, H. & Dennis, B. (1993) Density dependence tests, are they?Oecologia, 95, pp. 581–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yule, U.G. (1927) On a method of investigation periodicities in disturbed series with special reference to Wofer's sunspot numbers,Philos Trans R Soc Lond, A 226, pp. 267–98.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haak, C. The history of models. Does it matter?. Mind & Society 3, 33–41 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02511864

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02511864

Keywords

Navigation