Skip to main content
Log in

Privatizing public housing in Canada, A public policy agenda

  • Published:
Netherlands journal of housing and the built environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The new Progressive Conservative (PC) government in Ontario is planning to sell the 84,500 units (using the UK model) of public housing that it owns. This paper presents an evaluation of the programs to sell off public housing in the United Kingdom, the United States, and Canada. After a comparative evaluation, the author makes several recommendations for the Ontario government. The author argues that Canadian public-housing tenant characteristics are different from those in the UK. Ontario's public-housing tenants are too poor to purchase these units. They would be unable to maintain the unit and carry the costs (property tax, insurance, and utilities) even if the units were given to them free.

The author concurs that the sale of public housing units in the USA and the UK may have generated some revenue and saved some costs. However, he points out that in the long run, the modest financial gains will be offset by higher operating costs. The sale of the best units and those that are easy to maintain, along with the loss of higher-income tenants, will no doubt result in higher average operating costs for the remaining Units. Such unintended consequences of the sale should be avoided by the Ontario government. The author recommends that the province develop a comprehensive and multi-purpose plan covering an array of programs (including the sale of some units) rather than concentrate exclusively on the sale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achtenberg, E.P. (1989) “Subsidized Housing at Risk: The Social Costs of Private Ownership”, in Rosenberry S., and C. Hartman,Housing Issues of the 1990s, Philadelphia: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adrianow S. (1995) “Social Management and the Applicability of British and French Experiences to the Netherlands,”Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment (10), no. 1, pp. 27–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autry, C.J. (1994) “‘HOPE’ for Home Ownership”,Journal of Housing, September/October, pp. 36–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boelhouwer, P.J., and J. Van Weesep (1988) “The Sale of Public Housing and the Social Structure of Neighbourhoods”,Built Environment (14), no. 3/4, pp. 145–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgos, S. (1986) “Low-Income Home-ownership and the ACORN Squatters Campaign”, in Bratt R.G., C. Hartman, and A. Meyerson (eds.),Critical Perspective on Housing, Temple University Press.

  • Bratt, R.G. (1986) “Public Housing, the Controversy and Contribution,” in Bratt, G., C. Hartman, and A. Meyerson,Critical Perspective on Housing, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratt, R.G. (1989)Rebuilding a Low-Income Housing Policy, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratt, R.G. (1991) “Public Housing Authorities: Determining an Appropriate Role in a National Preservation Strategy”,Housing Policy Debate (2), no. 2, pp. 535–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprara, D. and B. Alexander (1989)Empowering Residents of Public Housing, Washington, D.C., National Center for Neighborhood Enterprise.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clay, W.L. (1990) “Don't Sell Public Housing!”,Journal of Housing, July/August, pp. 189–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • CMHC (1990)Public Housing Program, Program Evaluation Report.

  • CMHC (1991)Research & Development Highlights, Issue 12.

  • Cole, I., and R. Furbey (1994)The Eclipse of Council Housing, London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connerly, C.E. (1986) “What Should be Done with the Public Housing Program?”,Journal of the American Planning Association (52), no. 2, pp. 142–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, J. (1988a) “Bootstrap Home Owners”,Times (132), no. 19, November 7, p. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, J. (1988b) “Turning Public Housing Over to Resident Owners”,Times (132), no. 24, December 12, p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreier, P. and J. Atlas (1995) “US Housing Problems, Politics, and Policies in the 1990s”,Housing Studies (10), no. 2, pp. 245–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Emms, P. (1990).Social Housing, A European Dilemma?, Bristol: School for Advanced Urban Studies (SAUS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, R., D. Gordon, and A. Murie (1996) “The Position of Former Council Homes in the Housing Market”,Urban Studies (33), no. 1, pp. 125–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasheen, M., and C. Horing (1993) “Public Housing Authorities and HOPE 1: May HUD Give Away What It Doesn't Own?”,The Urban Lawyer (25), no. 1, pp. 69–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goering, J.M. (1993) “Towards the Comparative Exploration of Public Housing Segregation in England and the United States”,Housing Studies (8), no. 4, pp. 256–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. (1994)The Common Sense Revolution, Ontario, Canada.

  • Harloe, M. (1994) “Social Housing-Past, Present and Future”,Housing Studies (9), no. 3, pp. 407–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Housing Costs & Other Characteristics of Canadian Households (1993), Statistics Canada, Ottawa, p. 8.

  • Howenstine, E.J. (1983)Converting Public Housing to Individual and Cooperative Ownership: Lessons from Foreign Experiences, Washington, D.C.: HUD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandell, M.J. (1995) “Public Housing: The Ostrich Strategy”,Planning, June, pp. 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linneman, P.D. and I.F. Megbolugbe (1994) “Privatisation and Housing Policy”,Urban Studies (31), no. 4/5, pp. 635–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malpass, P. (1993) “Housing Management—By the People for the People”,Housing Review (42), no. 4, pp. 58–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAHRO (1977), Housing Assistance Program,Journal of Housing (11), no. 77.

  • MTHA (1995), Tenant Income Data, District 6, August.

  • Ontario Housing Corporation (1995), Comprehensive Asset Management Program, Ontario, Canada.

  • Rapp, L. (1994) “Tory Leader Rules out New Public Housing,”The Toronto Star, January 11.

  • Reid, B. (1995) “Inter-organizational networks and the delivery of Local Housing services”,Housing Studies (10), no. 2, pp. 133–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinvention: From Blueprint to Action (1995)HUD, March.

  • Rohe, W.M., and M.A. Stegman (1990)Public Home-ownership Demonstration Assessment, Washington, D.C.: HUD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohe, W.M., and M.A. Stegman (1992) “Public Housing Home ownership, Will it Work and for Whom?”,Journal of the American Planning Association (58), no. 2, pp. 144–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohe, W.M., and M.A. Stegman (1994) “The Effect of Home Ownership on the Self-Esteem, Perceived Control and Life Satisfaction”,Journal of American Planning Association, pp. 173–184.

  • Sayegh, K.S. (1987)Housing, A Canadian Perspective, Academy Book, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schill, M.H. (1990) “Privatizing Federal Low Income Housing Assistance: The Case of Public Housing”,Cornell Law Review (69), no. 2, pp. 878–948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schill, M.H. (1993) “Distressed Public Housing, Where Do We Go From Here”,The University of Chicago Law Review (60) no. 2, p. 512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D.C., R.C. Ferlanto, and D.N. Hoffman (1988)A New Housing Policy for America, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, H., J. McDonald, and R.J. Ortiz (1985) “Selling Public Housing: the Methods and Motivations”,Journal of Housing, November/December, pp. 213–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, H. (1990) “Privatization, Self-Help, and Public Housing Home ownership in the United states”, W. van Vliet and J. van Weesep,Government and Housing, Developments in Seven Countries, Sage Publications.

  • Strathcona heights, A Community Renewed (1994) City of Ottawa Non-profit Housing Company, Ottawa, September.

  • Streich, P. (1976a)Home ownership for Low-Income Canadians, CMHC.

  • Streich, P. (1976b)Tenant Purchase Program: Ontario 1971–1976, CMHC.

  • Struyk, R.J. (1977)Should Government Encourage Home ownership?, Urban Institute.

  • Symon, P. (1988) “Home-Owning Dreams that End in Nightmare: For a Growing Minority of Householders the Drain of their Mortgage is Leading to Financial Disaster,”Daily Telegraph, London, 31 October pp. 1–3.

  • Vakili-Zad, C. (1993) “Tenant Participation and Control in Public Housing in Canada”,Habitat International (17), no. 2, pp. 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, C.M.E. (1993) “Privatizing Housing: An Assessment of U.K. Experience”,Housing Policy Debate (4), Issue 1, Fannie Mae, pp 101–139.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Cyrus Vakili-Zad is an urban sociologist with more than ten years of research and teaching experience in Iran, the USA, and Canada. He has worked for the social housing sector in different capacities since 1988 in Boston, Massachusetts and currently in Toronto, Ontario. He is currently a research fellow at the Centre for Applied Social Research, University of Toronto and a member of a steering commitee on a major research project studying the housing experiences of refugees and immigrants in Metropolitan Toronto. The project is called Housing Experience of New Canadians.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vakili-Zad, C. Privatizing public housing in Canada, A public policy agenda. Neth J of Housing and the Built Environment 11, 47–68 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02496477

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02496477

Keywords

Navigation