First use of a video to assist the informed consent process in a randomized controlled trial in Japan
- Nobuyuki Hamajima,
- the Chubu Prostate Cancer Neoadjuvant Therapy Group
- … show all 2 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In the United States, visual instruction using videos to describe health care services in general, and for acquiring informed consent in randomized controlled trials, is becoming routine. This paper reports the first use of video in a randomized trial in Japan.
A video designed to describe treatment options to patients for prerandomization in a controlled trial for prostate cancer treatments was produced and distributed. Physicians participating in the trial were surveyed by questionnaire regarding the use of the video.
Of 47 eligible patients with prostate cancer, enrolled in this trial between 1992 and 1994, 20 patients (43%) viewed the video and 27 patients (57%) received all information from the physician. The objective of this study was to determine if viewing the video influenced the patient's desire to express a choice between treatment options. After receiving the information, 11 of 20 patients (55%) who viewed the video, and 22 of 27 patients (81%) who did not view the video, expressed a preference. The difference in expression of a treatment preference between patients in each group was not significant. When the responses of all the patients in the trial are combined, 33 of 47 patients (70%) expressed a treatment preference.
The benefits of providing information regarding treatment options in a video format, compared to other means of explanation, remains to be elucidated. However, videos may be a preferable method for acquiring informed consent from patients participating in randomized control trials.
- The Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences in collaboration with the World Health Organization. International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva, 1993.
- Guidelines on the Practice of Ethics Committees in Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. RCP, London
- Guideline on the Practice of Clinical Trials with Special Emphasis on Phase III Trials. J Jpn Soc Cancer Ther 32: pp. 67-114
- Williams, CJ, Zwitter, M (1994) Informed consent in European multicentre randomised clinical trials-are patients really informed?. Eur J Cancer 30A: pp. 907-910 CrossRef
- Shinoda M, Ohota K, Kobayashi T, Hyodo I, Watanabe T, Eguchi K. Doctors' dilemma of the informed consent in cancer clinical trials: the results of questionnaires for Japanese oncologists. Proc Jpn Cancer Assoc 1994;633.
- Taylor, KM, Shapiro, M, Soskolne, CL, Margolese, RG (1987) Physician response to informed consent regulations for randomized clinical trials. Cancer 60: pp. 1415-1422 CrossRef
- Muss, HB, White, DR, Michielutte, R, Richards, F, Cooper, MR, Williams, S, Stuart, JJ, Spurr, CL (1979) Written informed consent in patients with breast cancer. Cancer 43: pp. 1545-1550 CrossRef
- Cassileth, BR, Zupkins, R, Sutton-Smith, K, March, V (1980) Informed consent—why are its goals imperfectly realized?. New Engl J Med 302: pp. 896-900 CrossRef
- Barbour, GL, Blumenkrentz, JM (1978) Videotape aids informed consent decision. JAMA 240: pp. 2741-2742 CrossRef
- Fisher, WB, Cohen, SJ, Hammond, MK, Turner, S, Loehrer, PJ (1991) Clinical trials in cancer therapy: effects to improve patient enrollment by community oncologists. Med Pediat Oncol 19: pp. 165-168
- Grossman, SA, Piantodosi, S, Covahey, C (1994) Are informed consent forms that describe clinical oncology research protocols readable by most patients and their families?. J Clin Oncol 12: pp. 2211-2215
- Aaronson, NK, Visser-Pol, E, Leenhouts, GHMW, Muller, MJ, Schot, ACM, Dam, FSAM, Kues, RB, Koning, CCE, Huinink, WWB, Dongen, JA, Dubbelman, R (1996) Telephone-based nursing intervention improves the effectiveness of the informed consent process in cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 14: pp. 984-996
- Gunby, P (1992) From cell populations to human populations, cardiovascular research examines possibilities. JAMA 267: pp. 1046-1051 CrossRef
- Rice, B (1992) Educate your patients without taking more time. Med Econ 69: pp. 92-105
- Randall, T (1993) Producers of videodisc programs strive to expand patient's role in medical decision-making process. JAMA 270: pp. 160-162 CrossRef
- Hopper, KD, Zajdel, M, Hulse, SF, Yoanidis, NR, TenHave, TR, Labuski, MR, Houts, PS, Brensinger, CM, Hartman, DS (1994) Interactive method of informing patients of the risks of intravenous contrast media. Radiology 192: pp. 67-71
- General Rules for, Clinical and Pathological Studies on Prostate Cancer. Kanehara, Tokyo
- Oken, MM, Creech, RH, Tormey, DC, Horton, J, Davis, TE, McFadden, ET, Carbone, PP (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5: pp. 649-655
- Zelen, M (1979) A new design for randomized clinical trials. N Engl J Med 300: pp. 1242-1245 CrossRef
- Hamajima, N (1992) Randomized controlled trials on post-marketing drugs for cancer patients and informed consent. J Jpn, Soc Cancer Ther 27: pp. 1701-1706
- Nielsen, E, Sheppard, MA (1988) Television as a patient education tool: a review of its effectiveness. Patient Educ Couns 11: pp. 3-16 CrossRef
- Haimoff, EH, Rudin, DE (1993) Videos enhance patient complicance. Dent Econ 83: pp. 29-30
- Agre, P, Kurtz, RC, Krauss, BJ (1994) A randomized trial using videotape to present consent information for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 40: pp. 271-276 CrossRef
- Ellenberg, SS (1984) Randomization designs in comparative clinical trials. N Engl J Med 310: pp. 1404-1408 CrossRef
- First use of a video to assist the informed consent process in a randomized controlled trial in Japan
International Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume 2, Issue 3 , pp 156-160
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- prostate cancer
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Division of Epidemiology, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, 464, Nagoya, Japan