Abstract
It is shown informally that Cohn’s theory of Optimal Forms can be construed as a comparative theory, and that when this is done the celebrated theory of transformations of D’Arcy Thompson follows as a consequence. The implications of this type of theoretical foundation for the Thompson theory with regard to problems of comparative morphology are discussed, and some suggestions for the further implementation of the theory are described.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature
Cohn, D. L. 1954. “Optimal Systems I: The Vascular System.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,16, 59–74.
Clark, W. E., and P. B. Medawar, (editors). 1945.Essays on Growth and Form. Oxford: The University Press.
Rashevsky, N. 1941. “A Note on the Nature of Correlations Between Different Characteristics of Organisms.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,3, 93–95.
—. 1960.Mathematical Biophysics, 3rd Ed., Vol. II. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.
— 1959. “Abstract Mathematical Molecular Biology.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,23, 237–260
Rosen, R. 1959. “A Relational Theory of Biological Systems II.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,21, 109–128.
Schiffer, M. 1954. “Variations of Domain Functionals.”Bull. Am. Math. Soc.,60, 303–328.
Thompson, D’Arcy W. 1917.On Growth and Form. Cambridge: The University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by the United States Air Force through the Air Force Office of Scientific Research of the Air Research and Development Command, under Contract No. AF 49(638)-917.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rosen, R. The derivation of D’Arcy Thompson’s theory of transformations from the theory of optimal design. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 24, 279–290 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02477959
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02477959