Abstract
The National Forest Management Act (1976) specifies that multiresource inventories be conducted to provide baseline data for development and, later, monitoring of national forest management plans. This mandate entails the most ambitious and complex resource planning effort ever attempted. In this paper we evaluate the structure and use of current inventory-monitoring programs and recommend a framework for gathering data to improve national forest planning. Current national guidelines are general and provide only basic directions to forest-level planners. Forest inventories have traditionally concentrated on timber. Although these inventories are often well designed, the questions we are now asking about forest resources have outgrown these methods. Forest management is impeded by general confusion over definitions of resources and the interactions among them. We outline a simple classification scheme that centers on identification of basic ecosystem elements that can be readily measured. Furthermore, spatial and temporal scales must be considered in the design of inventory-monitoring programs. The concept of ecological indicators is reviewed, and caution is advised in their use. Inventory-monitoring programs should be goal-directed and based on as rigorous a statistical design as possible. We also review fundamental issues of variable selection, validation, and sampling bias. We conclude by developing a flexible inventory-monitoring program that is designed to provide information on individual characteristics of the environment, rather than being based on fixed definitions of resources.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Block, W. M., K. A. With, and M. L. Morrison. 1987. On measuring bird habitat: Influence of observer variability and sample size.Condor 89:241–251.
Brennan, L. A., and M. L. Morrison. 1990. Influence of sample size on interpretations of foraging patterns by chestnut-backed chickadees.Studies in Avian Biology 13:187–192.
Carey, H. H., and N. Dennis. 1984. Analysis and display of multiresource interactions in the RPA assessment. USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, California. Unpublished report, 36 pp.
EMAP (Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program). 1990. Environmental monitoring and assessment program: 1990 project descriptors. June 1990. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC EPA/600/9-90/028.
Forest Service. 1989. Draft 1990 RPA program. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC.
Forest Service. 1990. Resource inventory handbook. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC. FSH 1909.14. Amendment No. 1, 3/29/90.
Fretwell, S. D. 1972. Populations in a seasonal environment. Monograph in population biology No. 5. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Garcia, M. W. 1989. Forest service experience with interdisciplinary teams developing integrated resource management plans.Environmental Management 13:583–592.
Gotfryd, A., and R. I. C. Hansell. 1985. The impact of observer bias on multivariate analysis of vegetation structure.Oikos 45:223–234.
Green, R. H. 1979. Sampling design and statistical methods for environmental biologists. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 257 pp.
Hansen, A. J., T. A. Spies, F. J. Swanson, and J. L. Ohmann. 1991. Conserving biodiversity in managed forests: lessons from natural forests.BioScience 41:382–392.
Heady, H. F. 1975. Rangeland management. McGraw-Hill, New York, 460 pp.
Hunsaker, C. T., and D. E. Carpenter (eds.), 1990. Ecological indicators for the Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. EPA 600/3-90/060.
Kelly, J. R., and M. A. Harwell. 1990. Indicators of ecosystem recovery.Environmental Management 14:527–545.
Kepler, C. B., and J. M. Scott. 1981. Reducing bird count variability by training observers.Studies in Avian Biology 6:366–371.
LaBau, V. J., and T. Cunia. 1990. State-of-the-art methodology of forest inventory: A symposium proceedings, 30 July–5 August 1989, Syracuse, New York. Workshop 2: Integrating multiple-value forest surveys into timber survey. USDA Forest Service, Portland, Oregon. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-263, pp. 467–543.
Landres, P. B., J. Verner, and J. W. Thomas. 1988. Ecological uses of vertebrate indicator species: A critique.Conservation Biology 2:316–328.
Lund, H. G. 1984. Workshop background. Pages 1–7in H. G. Lund (ed.), Preparing for the 21st century. Proceedings of the forest land inventory workshop, Denver, Colorado, 26–30 March 1984. USDA Forest Service, Timber Management, Washington, DC.
Lund, H. G. 1986. A primer on integrating resource inventories. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report WO-49. 64 pp.
Lund, H. G., and C. E. Thomas. 1989. A primer on stand and forest inventory designs. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report WO-54. 96 pp.
Marcot, B. G., R. S. Holthausen, J. Teply, and W. D. Carrier. 1991. Old growth inventories in the Pacific Northwest: definitions, status, and visions for the future. Pages 47–70in L. F. Ruggiero, K. B. Aubry, A. B. Carey, and M. H. Huff, (technical coordinators), Wildlife and vegetation of unmanaged Douglas-fir forests. USDA Forest Service, Portland, Oregon. General Technical Report PNW-285.
McClure, J. P., N. D. Cost, and H. A. Knight. 1979. Multiresource inventories—a newconcept for forest survey. USDA Forest Service, Research Paper SE-191. 68 pp.
Morrison, M. L. 1983. Assessing changes and trends in wildlife habitat in a forest management context. Pages 101–103in J. F. Bell and T. Atterbury (eds.), Renewable resource inventories for monitoring changes and trends. SAF 83-14. Oregon State University, Corvallis.
Morrison, M. L. 1986. Bird populations as indicators of environmental change. Pages 429–451in R. F. Johnston, (ed.), Current ornithology, Volume 3. Plenum Press, New York.
Morrison, M. L., I. C. Timossi, K. A. With, and P. N. Manley. 1985. Use of tree species by forest birds during winter and summer. Journal of Wildlife Management 49:1098–1102.
Morrison, M. L., I. C. Timossi, and K. A. With. 1987. Development and testing of linear regression models predicting bird-habitat relationships.Journal of Wildlife Management 51:247–253.
Morrison, M. L., C. J. Ralph, and J. Verner (eds.). 1990. Avian foraging: Theory, methodology, and applications.Studies in Avian Biology 13:1–515.
Munn, R. E. 1988. The design of integrated monitoring systems to provide early indications of environmental/ecological changes.Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 11:203–217.
Noss, R. F. 1990. Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: A hierarchical approach.Conservation Biology 4:355–364.
OTA (Office of Technology Assessment, US Congress). 1987. Technologies to maintain biological diversity. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. OTA-F-330. 334 pp.
OTA (Office of Technology Assessment, US Congress). 1992. Forest Service planning: Accommodting uses, producing outputs, and sustaining ecosystems. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. OTA-F-SOS. 206 pp.
Ohmann, J. L. 1989. Status and trends of coniferous forest habitats in the western United States. Pages 38–50in B. G. Pendleton (ed.), Proceedings of the western raptor management symposium and workshop, 26–28 October 1987, Boise, Indiana. Science and Technology Series No. 12. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, DC.
Ohmann, J. L. 1990. Multiresource inventories in the Pacific Coast states—progress and future direction. Pages 529–537in V. J. LaBau, and T. Cunia (technical coordinators), State-of-the-art methodology of forest inventory: A symposium proceedings, 30 July–5 August 1989, Syracuse, New York. USDA Forest Service, Portland, Oregon, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-263.
Ohmann, J. L., and W. B. Cohen. 1994. Inventories of stand structure: an ecosystem perspective.In Proceedings, stand inventory technologies: An international, multiple resource conference, 13–18 September 1992, Portland OR. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (in press).
Ohmann, J. L., and K. E. Mayer. 1987. Wildlife habitats of California's hardwood forests—linking extensive inventory data with habitat models. Pages 174–182in T. R. Plumb and N. H. Pillsbury (technical coordinators), Proceedings of the symposium on multiple-use management of California's hardwood resources, 12–14 November 1986, San Luis Obispo, California. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, California. General Technical Report PSW-100.
Patton, D. R. 1987. Is the use of “management indicator species” feasible?Western Journal of Applied Forestry 2: 33–34.
Ralph, C. J., and J. M. Scott (eds.). 1981. Estimating numbers of terrestrial brids.Studies in Avian Biology No 6. 630 pp.
Roughgarden, J. 1989. The United States needs an ecological survey.BioSciences 39(1):5.
Schreuder, H. T., T. G. Gregoire, and G. B. Wood. 1993. Sampling methodsfor multiresource forest inventory. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 446 pp.
Szaro, R. C., and H. D. Salwasser. 1990. Conserving the heritage: The USDA Forest Service on biological diversity. Pages 12–14in Forestry on the Frontier. Proceedings of the 1989 Society of American Foresters National Convention. Society of American Foresters, Bethesda, Maryland.
Verner, J., and K. A. Milne. 1990. Analyst and observer variability in density estimates from spot mapping.Condor 92:313–325.
Williams, B. L., and B. G. Marcot. 1991. Use of biodiversity indicators for analyzing and managing forest landscapes. North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 56:613–627.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morrison, M.L., Marcot, B.G. An evaluation of resource inventory and monitoring program used in national forest planning. Environmental Management 19, 147–156 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02472011
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02472011