Skip to main content
Log in

A method of measuring quantitative hepatic function and hemodynamics in cirrhosis: The changes following distal splenorenal shunt

  • Review Article
  • Published:
The Japanese journal of surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quantiative measurement is required to define the severity of chronic liver disease and the effects of therapy on its complications. This paper presents a method of such assessment based on measurement of hepatocyte function, liver volume, functional liver blood flow, portal perfusion and cardiac output. Data are presented on 54 patients evaluated prior to, and one year after DSRS for variceal bleeding. Preoperative testing showed that alcoholics (n=24) had significantly (p<0.05) larger liver and smaller spleen volumes than nonalcoholic cirrhotics (n=22) and patients with portal vein thrombosis (n=8), but that the other parameters were not significantly different by etiologies. At one year after DSRS: all groups showed a significant (p<0.01) reduction of 41 per cent in spleen size: liver volume was significantly (p<0.05) reduced in cirrhotics: there was a significantly (p<0.01) greater loss of portal perfusion in alcoholic cirrhosis: liver blood flow showd a significant (p<0.05) rise in alcoholics when compared to nonalcoholics and portal vein thrombosis patients: cardiac output ros in alcoholic cirrhosis: hepatocyte function was not significantly different in any group. This study shows that in patients all doing well clinically one year after DSRS, there are markedly different hemodynamic responses. Further studies on cirrhosis aimed at improving therapy for its complications should include some objective, quentitative assessment, first to define the study population, and second to measure the effect of the therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zeppa R. (Ed). Progress symposium in portal hypertension. World J Surg 1984; 1: 625–752.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tygstrup N. The galactose elimination capacity in control subjects and in patients with cirrhosis of the liver. Acta Med Scand 1964: 175: 281–289.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Henderson JM, Fales FW. Continuous flow fluorometry of low galactose concentrations in blood and plasma. Clin Chem 1980; 26: 282–284.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Henderson JM, Heymsfield SB, Horowitz J, Kutner MH. Measurement of liver and spleen volume by computed tomography. Radiology 1981; 141: 525–527.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Henderson JM, Kutner MH, Bain RP. First-order clearance of plasma galactose: the effect of liver disease. Gastroenterology 1982; 83: 1090–1096.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Henderson JM, Pearson TC, Millikan WJ, Warren WD. Galactose clearance as a measure of effective liver blood flow. Gastroenterology (Abstr.) 1985; 88: 1664.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Feigenbaum H. Clinical applications of echocardiography. Progr Cardiovas Dis 1972; 14: 531.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Scholz PM, Rerych SK, Moran JF, Newman GE, Douglas JM, Sabiston DC, Jones RH. Quantitative radionuclide angiocardiography. Catheterization and cardiovascular Diagnosis 1980; 6: 265–283.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nordlinger BM, Nordlinger DE, Millikan WJ, Fulenwider JT, Sones PJ, Kutner MH, Steele R, Bain R, Warren WD. Angiography in portal hypertension. Clinical significance in surgery. Am J Surg 1980; 159: 132–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dixon WG, Brwon MB. (Eds.). Biomedical Computer Programs. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Millikan WJ, Warren WD, Henderson JM, Smith RB, Salam AA, Galambos JT, Kutner MH, Keen JH. The emory prospective randomized trial. Selective vs nonselective shunt to control variceal bleeding. Ten year follow-up. Ann Surg 1985; 201: 712–722.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Langer B, Taylor BR, MacKenzie DR, Gilas T, Stone RM, Blendis L. Further report of a prospective randomized trial comparing distal splenorenal shunt with end-to-side portacaval shunt. An analysis of encephalopathy, survival, and quality of life. Gastroentrology 1985; 88: 424–429.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Reichle FA, Fahmy WF, Golsorkhi M. Prospective comparative clinical trial with distal splenorenal and measocaval shunts. Am J Surg 1979; 137: 13–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Conn HO, Resnick RH, Grace ND, et al. Distal splenorenal shunt vs portal-systemic shunt: Current status of a controlled trial. Hepatology 1981; 1: 151–160.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fischer JE, Bower RH, Atamian S, Welling R. Comparison of distal and proximal splenorenal shunts. A randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg 1981; 194: 531–544.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Villamil F, Redeker A, Reynolds T, Yellin A. A controlled trial of distal splenorenal and portacaval shunts. (Abstr.) Hepatology 1981 1: 557.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zeppa R, Hensley GT, Levi JU, et al. The comparative survival of alcoholics versus nonalcoholics after distal splenorenal shunt. Ann Surg 1978; 187: 510–514.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Warren WD, Millikan WJ, Henderson JM et al. Ten years portal hypertensive surgery at Emory. Results and new perspectives. Ann Surg 1982; 195: 530–542.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Henderson JM, Millikan WJ, Wright-Bacon L, Kutner MH, Warren WD. Hemodynamic differences between alcoholic and nonalcoholic cirrhotics following distal splenorenal shunt—effect on survival? Ann Surg 1983; 198: 325–334.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Henderson JM, Gong-Liang J, Galloway J, Millikan WJ, Sones PJ, Warren WD Portal prival collaterals following distal splenorenal shunt. Incidence, magnitude and associated portal perfusion changes. J of Hepatol 1985; 1: 649–661.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Inokuchi K, Beppu K, Koyanagi N, Nagamine K, Hashizume M, Sugimachi K. Exclusion of nonisolated splenic vein in distal splenorenal shunt for prevention of portal malcirculation. Ann Surg 1984. 200: 711–717.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Isomatsu T. Loss of selectivity of Warren shunt in long-term observation. Jpn J Surg 1983; 13: 202–206.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Warren WD, Millikan WJ, Henderson JM, Rasheed ME, Salam AA. Selective variceal decompression after splenectomy or splenic vein thrombosis—with a note on splenopancreatic disconnection. Ann Surg 1984; 199: 694–702.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Conn HO. Endoscopic sclerotherapy. An analysis of variants. Hepatology 1983; 2: 641–644.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Paquet KJ, Fleig WE. Sclerotherapy of esophageal varices. In Papp JP, ed. Endoscopic control of gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Boca Raton: Florida CRC Press, 1981; 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  26. MacDougall BRD, Westaby D, Theodossi A, Dawson JC, Williams R. Increased long term survival in variceal hemorrhage using injection sclerotherapy. Results of a controlled trial. Lancet 1982; i: 124–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Warren WD, Henderson JM, Millikan WJ, Galambos JT, Brooks WS, Riepe SP, Salam AA, Kutner MH. Distal splenorenal shunt versus endoscopic sclerotherapy for long term management of variceal bleeding. Annals Surg 1986: In press.

  28. Millikan WJ, Henderson JM, Potts JR, Warren WD, Galambos J, Brooks WS, Riepe S. Liver function and hemodynamic status 1 year into sclerotherapy for variceal bleeding. Gastroenterology (Abstr.) 1984; 86: 1184.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Henderson, J.M., Warren, W.D. A method of measuring quantitative hepatic function and hemodynamics in cirrhosis: The changes following distal splenorenal shunt. The Japanese Journal of Surgery 16, 157–168 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02471088

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02471088

Key Words

Navigation